Cited by 135Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational and Psychological AssessmentsEducational Assessment and Improvement

Integrating data-based decision making, Assessment for Learning and diagnostic testing in formative assessment

Open access
Van der Kleij, Fabienne M., Vermeulen, Jorine A., Schildkamp, Kim, Eggen, Theo J.H.M.·2015·Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice

Abstract

Recent research has highlighted the lack of a uniform definition of formative assessment, although its effectiveness is widely acknowledged. This paper addresses the theoretical differences and similarities amongst three approaches to formative assessment that are currently most frequently discussed in educational research literature: data-based decision making (DBDM), Assessment for Learning (AfL) and diagnostic testing (DT). Furthermore, the differences and similarities in the implementation of each approach were explored. This analysis shows that although differences exist amongst the theoretical underpinnings of DBDM, AfL and DT, the combination of these approaches can create more informed learning environments. The thoughtful integration of the three assessment approaches should lead to more valid formative decisions, if a range of evidence about student learning is used to continuously optimise student learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0969594x.2014.999024

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M.
Affiliations
  • ,
  • Cito (Netherlands) (NL)
  • University of Twente (NL)
Venue
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
Published
2015-01-22
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
324-343
ISSN
  • 0969-594X (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-329X
OpenAlex
W1969930081
Cited by
135
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
38.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cito, Institute for Educational Measurement
  • University of Twente
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
formative assessment, data-driven decision making, assessment for learning, diagnostic testing, student learning, assessment validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review