Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 427

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War

Open access
Sambanis, Nicholas·2002·Defence and Peace Economics
DOI 10.1080/10242690210976
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reviews the booming literature on civil war. It presents the major theoretical perspectives and key empirical results on the determinants of civil war. The paper identifies controversies in the field and suggests ways to improve and organize our research. The conclusion outlines possible future directions for research on civil wars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10242690210976

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 427

Metadata

Authors
Sambanis, N.
Venue
Defence and Peace Economics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
215-243
ISSN
  • 1024-2694 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8267
DOI
10.1080/10242690210976
OpenAlex
W2061008130
Cited by
427
References
4
FWCI
101.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10242690210976
The paper
Sambanis, N. (2002). A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War. Defence and Peace Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690210976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.