The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges
Abstract
Glucose measurement is a critical investigation in metabolic disease management, especially in diabetes and inherited disorders. However, both laboratory-based and handheld point-of-care (HPOC) (glucometers) glucose testing face significant preanalytical and analytical challenges. In central laboratories, glycolysis in uncentrifuged samples leads to glucose consumption, which may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Although sodium fluoride (NaF) is commonly used as a glycolysis inhibitor, it has a delayed effect, requiring several hours to stabilize glucose concentrations. Recently, citrate-buffered NaF-EDTA (FCE) tubes have been introduced to inhibit glycolysis more effectively, yet they remain underused. Preanalytical variables, including sample collection, transport, and processing delays, further impact glucose stability and the diagnosis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). HPOC devices provide an alternative by delivering rapid results and minimizing preanalytical errors, but glucose meters are prone to physiological and analytical interferences, such as hematocrit variations, environmental conditions, presence of redox-active drugs, and enzymatic specificity issues. These interferences may lead to inaccurate glucose readings, impairing clinical decision-making, especially in intensive care and emergency settings. Moreover, discrepancies between capillary and venous glucose concentrations can contribute to misdiagnosis and inappropriate glycemic management. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of glucose measurement methodologies, their limitations, and potential improvements, emphasizing the need for preanalytical harmonization in laboratory testing and a better understanding of interferences in HPOC testing. Standardization of blood sample handling and adoption of optimized collection tubes could enhance glucose measurement reliability, ultimately improving diabetes diagnosis and patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011300 · Cited by 9,977
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
(2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810625 · Cited by 5,119
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B. A., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0028 · Cited by 4,237
2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Bannuru, R. R., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Ekhlaspour, L., Gaglia, J. L., Hilliard, M. E., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2024) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc24-s002 · Cited by 2,086 · cited 1×
“…of Laboratory Medicine (EFLM ) strongly recommend using venous plasma promptly separated within 30 min of collection, or collected into fluoride-citrate tubes when immediate centrifugation is not feasible, to ensure reliable glucose values and avoid spurious hypoglycemia due to glycolysis [22].”
Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose
Clarke, W. L., Cox, D., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Carter, W., & Pohl, S. L. (1987) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.10.5.622 · Cited by 1,435
Cryer, P. E., Axelrod, L., Grossman, A. B., Heller, S. R., Montori, V. M., Seaquist, E. R., & Service, F. J. (2009) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1410 · Cited by 1,277 · cited 2×
“If left untreated, it can lead to severe complications, including infections, neurological impairment, coma, and death [1].”
Glucose Biosensors: An Overview of Use in Clinical Practice
Yoo, E.-H., & Lee, S.-Y. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100504558 · Cited by 1,137
American Diabetes Association (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s106 · Cited by 988
Hydrocortisone, Vitamin C, and Thiamine for the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Marik, P. E., Khangoora, V., Rivera, R., Hooper, M. H., & Catravas, J. (2017) · Chest · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.11.036 · Cited by 887
Parkes, J. L., Slatin, S. L., Pardo, S., & Ginsberg, B. H. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143 · Cited by 620
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1043/1543-2165(2005)129<454b:PWMIM>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2005)129
- NICE, Guideline. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. Diabetes Pregnancy. 2020.
- Figure 3. Parks error grid plot. The x-axis represents blood glucose…. [cited 2025 Jun 19]. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Parks-Error-Grid-Plot-The-x-axis-represents-blood-glucose-concentrations-derived-from_fig2_356925783
Metadata
- Authors
- Grzych, G., Defauwes, I., de Tullio, P., Pekar, J. D., Brousseau, T., Lippi, G., & Cavalier, E.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2025-07-26
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 613-630
- ISSN
- 1040-8363
- 1549-781X
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 104
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855
- The paper
- Grzych, G., Defauwes, I., de Tullio, P., Pekar, J. D., Brousseau, T., Lippi, G., & Cavalier, E. (2025). Blood glucose measurement inside and outside the laboratory: both preanalytical and analytical challenges. Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2533855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.