Cited by 149Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutritional Studies and Diet

Snacking Definitions: Impact on Interpretation of the Literature and Dietary Recommendations

Johnson, Guy H., Anderson, G. Harvey·2010·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Snacking is a ubiquitous practice that has increased in recent years. However, the impact of snacking on the diet is difficult to assess because a variety of approaches have been used to define snacking (and snack foods) in the literature. This lack of a universally accepted definition complicates interpretation of the literature and limits the development of science-based recommendations for consumers. The purpose of this review is to illustrate this problem by showing that the conclusions derived from the literature are heavily dependent on the definition used or implied by the authors. It is suggested that the a universally accepted definition for snacking be developed by a coalition of stakeholders to provide a template for future research, guidance for the food industry and to enable the development of well-substantiated dietary recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408390903572479

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date there has been no comprehensive review of studies investigating associations between meal patterns and diet quality.

    “Moreover, to date there has been no comprehensive review of studies investigating associations between meal patterns and diet quality; previous reviews have focused on dietary contributions in relation to eating frequency or snacking( 8 , 9 ).”
  • Previous reviews of the impact of different definitions on the interpretation of meal pattern studies have examined snacking only.

    “However, previous reviews of the impact of different definitions on the interpretation of meal pattern studies have examined snacking only( 7 , 8 ).”
  • Although it is widely acknowledged that different definitions used to define meals and snacks are likely to hamper interpretation of findings across studies, research explicitly examining the impact of these different definitions is rare.

    “Although it is widely acknowledged that different definitions used to define meals/snacks are likely to hamper interpretation of findings across studies( 8 , 44 ), research explicitly examining the impact of these different definitions is rare( 55 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, G. H., & Anderson, G. H.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2010-09-30
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
848-871
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W2097526613
Cited by
149
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
snacking, snacks, dietary recommendations, food consumption patterns, stakeholder consensus
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutritional Requirements, Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review