Cited by 332Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutritional Studies and Diet

Snacking frequency in relation to energy intake and food choices in obese men and women compared to a reference population

Bertéus Forslund, H, Torgerson, J S, Sjöström, L, Lindroos, A K·2005·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective To investigate snacking frequency in relation to energy intake and food choices, taking physical activity into account, in obese vs reference men and women.Design Cross-sectional, descriptive study.Subjects In total, 4259 obese, middle-aged subjects (1891 men and 2368 women) from the baseline examination of the XENDOS study and 1092 subjects (505 men and 587 women) from the SOS reference study were included.Measurements A meal pattern questionnaire describing habitual intake occasions (main meals, light meals/breakfast, snacks, drink-only), a dietary questionnaire describing habitual energy and macronutrient intake and a questionnaire assessing physical activity at work and during leisure time were used.Results The obese group consumed snacks more frequently compared to the reference group (P<0.001) and women more frequently than men (P<0.001). Energy intake increased with increasing snacking frequency, irrespective of physical activity. Statistically significant differences in trends were found for cakes/cookies, candies/chocolate and desserts for the relation between energy intake and snacking frequency, where energy intake increased more by snacking frequency in obese subjects than in reference subjects.Conclusion Obese subjects were more frequent snackers than reference subjects and women were more frequent snackers than men. Snacks were positively related to energy intake, irrespective of physical activity. Sweet, fatty food groups were associated with snacking and contributed considerably to energy intake. Snacking needs to be considered in obesity treatment, prevention and general dietary recommendations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802950

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The classification of temporal distribution of meals is usually based on cultural norms.

    “The classification of temporal distribution of meals is usually based on cultural norms (67,68) .”
  • A recent review of dietary therapies and innovative time-associated dietary approaches concluded that regular meal eating habits might facilitate maintaining weight while unplanned snacking as well as consuming the major part of the energy intake at the end of the day seem to be unfavourable.

    “A recent review of dietary therapies and innovative time-associated dietary approaches concluded that regular meal eating habits might facilitate maintaining weight while unplanned snacking as well as consuming the major part of the energy intake at the end of the day seem to be unfavourable (67) .”
  • The participant-identified definition avoids the imposition of a complex criterion to classify eating occasions as meals or snacks.

    “While this definition avoids the imposition of a complex criterion to classify EO as meals or snacks( 45 – 47 )”
  • Eleven studies applied no additional criteria, whereas other studies delineated eating occasions using 15-min, 30-min, 45-min plus 50 kcal, or 59-min intervals.

    “For example, eleven studies( 23 , 45 – 47 , 52 , 66 , 69 , 75 , 78 , 80 , 82 ) applied no additional criteria, whereas in other studies, EO were delineated using 15-min time intervals( 57 , 70 , 77 ), a 30-min interval( 53 ), a 45-min interval plus a 50 kcal (210 kJ) energy criterion( 15 ) and a 59-min interval (applied to meals only)( 48 ).”
  • Meal patterns were mostly participant-identified, although these studies varied in the additional criteria used to determine an individual eating occasion, meal and/or snack, and their treatment of beverages.

    “Meal patterns were mostly participant-identified( 15 , 23 , 45 – 48 , 52 , 53 , 57 , 66 , 69 , 70 , 75 , 77 , 78 , 82 ), although these studies varied in the additional criteria used to determine an individual EO, meal and/or snack, and their treatment of beverages.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertéus Forslund, H., Torgerson, J. S., Sjöström, L., & Lindroos, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Lindroos, A K
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2005-04-05
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
711-719
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2098658447
Cited by
332
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
snacking frequency, energy intake, obesity, food choice, meal patterns, physical activity, sex differences, desserts
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Choice Behavior, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Sex Factors, Sweden, Exercise, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review