CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Nutritional Studies and DietPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomarkers of Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Human Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review

Baldrick, Francina R., Woodside, Jayne V., Elborn, J. Stuart, Young, Ian S., McKinley, Michelle C.·2011·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
DOI 10.1080/10408398.2010.482217
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Observational evidence consistently shows that consumption of a diet rich in fruit and vegetables may offer protection against diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Assessment of dietary intake is complex and prone to many sources of error. More objective biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake are therefore of interest. The aim of this review is to examine the usefulness of the main biomarkers of fruit and vegetable intake to act as objective indicators of compliance in dietary intervention studies. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using six databases. Suitable papers were selected and relevant data extracted. The papers were categorized into 3 sub-groups: whole diet interventions; mixed fruit and vegetable interventions; and studies involving individual varieties of fruits or vegetables. Ninety-six studies were included in the review. Overall, the most commonly measured, and most consistently responsive, biomarkers were the carotenoids and vitamin C. Based on the results of this systematic review, it remains prudent to measure a panel of biomarkers in fruit and vegetable intervention studies. The only possible exception to this is "fruit only" intervention studies where assessment of vitamin C alone may suffice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2010.482217

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 150 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Campbell D. R., 1994, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 3, 493
  2. Franciose J. L., 2006, Curr. Topic Nutraceut. Res., 4, 69
  3. Hussein L., 1990, Int. J. Vit. Nutr. Res., 60, 229
  4. Lee R. D., 2003, Nutritional Assessments
  5. Le Marchand L., 1994, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 3, 245
  6. Lin Y-J., 2007, Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr., 16, 616
  7. Marniemi J., 2000, Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis., 10, 331
  8. Martini M. C., 1995, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 4, 491
  9. 2002, The Composition of Foods, 6th Summary Edition
  10. Moller P., 2003, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 12, 1016
  11. Nielsen S. E., 2002, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 11, 459
  12. Rock C. L., 1997, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 6, 617
  13. Smith-Warner S. A., 2000, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 9, 307

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 109

Related

Metadata

Authors
Baldrick, F. R., Woodside, J. V., Elborn, J. S., Young, I. S., & McKinley, M. C.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-10
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
795-815
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
DOI
10.1080/10408398.2010.482217
OpenAlex
W2041984497
Cited by
109
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007438/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, biomarkers, dietary assessment, dietary intervention studies, compliance monitoring, carotenoids, vitamin C
MeSH terms
Ascorbic Acid, Beverages, Energy Intake, Carotenoids, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Fruit, Humans, Vegetables, Lutein, Biomarkers, Xanthophylls, Zeaxanthins, Cryptoxanthins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review