Cited by 84Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Enhanced expectancies improve movement efficiency in runners

Stoate, Isabelle, Wulf, Gabriele, Lewthwaite, Rebecca·2012·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

We followed up on recent findings demonstrating that enhancing performers' expectancies can improve their performance. Specifically, we examined whether providing experienced runners with positive feedback regarding their movement efficiency would increase running efficiency. Two groups of experienced runners ran on a treadmill at 75% of their maximum oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) for 10 min. One group (enhanced expectancy) was provided with (fabricated) feedback about the efficiency of their running style every 2 min. A control group was not given feedback. Oxygen consumption decreased in the enhanced expectancy group across measurement times (every 2 min for 10 min), but remained the same in the control group. In addition, performance perceptions changed only in the enhanced expectancy group, indicating a perception of greater ease of running and reduced fatigue when assessed after compared with before running. Finally, positive affect increased from a pre- to a post-test in the enhanced expectancy group, in contrast to the control group. Our findings show that enhanced expectancies can have a positive effect on movement efficiency and running experience. They add to the accumulating evidence for the social-cognitive-affective-motor nature of motor performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2012.671533

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoate, I., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Wulf, Gabriele
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2012-03-23
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
815-823
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2000464833
Cited by
84
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
expectancy, positive feedback, running efficiency, movement efficiency, oxygen consumption, subjective fatigue, positive affect, motor performance, treadmill running
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Test, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Perception, Running, Muscle Fatigue, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review