The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Pedagogical Beliefs and Perceived Trust on Teachers’ Acceptance of Educational Artificial Intelligence Tools
Abstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have stimulated the development of educational AI tools (EAIT). EAITs intelligently assist teachers in formulating better pedagogical decisions or actions for their students. However, teachers are hardly integrating EAITs, and little is known about their perceptions of EAITs. This study seeks to identify human factors that encourage or restrict teachers’ acceptance of EAITs. We propose a revised technology acceptance model incorporating teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust in EAITs. Survey data were collected from 215 teachers in South Korea and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results indicate that teachers with constructivist beliefs are more likely to integrate EAITs than teachers with transmissive orientations. Furthermore, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived trust in EAITs are determinants to be considered when explaining teachers’ acceptance of EAITs. Among them, the most influential determinant of predicting their acceptance was found to be how easily the EAIT is constructed. Significant implications for researchers and stakeholders regarding the development and integration of EAITs are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the results of a study with teachers from South Korea indicate that teachers with constructivist beliefs are more likely to integrate educational AI-based tools than teachers with transmissive orientations [33].”
From ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021) · Classroom Companion: Business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 · Cited by 10,343
Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct
Pajares, M. F. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062003307 · Cited by 9,007
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · cited 1×
“These TAM-measuring items were adopted from Venkatesh and Bala (2008), which were based on Davis (1989).”
MethodReporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338 · Cited by 6,937 · cited 1×
“Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the measurement model and to assess convergent validity, reliability, and discriminant validity (Hair et al., 2010; Schreiber et al., 2006).”
MethodTeacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,107
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n51.2000 · DOI
- 10.1080/10447318.2021.1970430 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5 · DOI
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Pearson.
- Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2015). Deep knowledge tracing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015-Janua, 505–513.
- 10.1145/3362789.3362918 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3313831.3376416 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5er8f · Cited by 7,552
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326
“Important steps to responsibly mitigate such an issue can be the following: • Asking the authors of the original documents trans-parently (i.e., purpose and policy of data usage) for permission to use their content for training the model”
BackgroundCelik, I. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468 · Cited by 1,012
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1 · Cited by 696
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413
A Comprehensive Review on Generative AI for Education
Mittal, U., Sai, S., Chamola, V., & Sangwan, D. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3468368 · Cited by 383
Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Hajjej, F., Thabit, S., El-Qirem, F. A., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Mulhem, A. A. A., Alkhdour, T., et al. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11223662 · Cited by 255
Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104898 · Cited by 309
Mughairi, H. A., & Bhaskar, P. (2024) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0129 · Cited by 257
Grájeda, A., Burgos, J., Olivera, P. C., & Sanjinés, A. (2023) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2023.2287917 · Cited by 266
What Explains Teachers’ Trust in AI in Education Across Six Countries?
Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x · Cited by 179
Jagatheesaperumal, S. K., Ahmad, K., Al‐Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3358859 · Cited by 229
Students' adoption of AI-based teacher-bots (T-bots) for learning in higher education
Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Metri, B., & Kaushik, N. (2024) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-02-2021-0152 · Cited by 176
Galindo‐Domínguez, H., Delgado, N., Campo, L., & Iglesias, D. L. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102381 · Cited by 268
Hazzan-Bishara, A., Kol, O., & Levy, S. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z · Cited by 225
Jang, Y., Choi, S., & Kim, H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11086-5 · Cited by 135
Self-citationAdoption of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Al-Momani, A. M., & Ramayah, T. (2024) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61463-7_7 · Cited by 151
Practical early prediction of students’ performance using machine learning and eXplainable AI
Jang, Y., Choi, S., Jung, H., & Kim, H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11120-6 · Cited by 114
Self-citationAcceptance of artificial intelligence: key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies
Rane, N., Choudhary, S. P., & Rane, J. (2024) · Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48185/jaai.v5i2.1017 · Cited by 152
Mustofa, R. H., Kuncoro, T. G., Atmono, D., Hermawan, H. D., & Sukirman, S. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100379 · Cited by 187
Nazaretsky, T., Mejia‐Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Frej, J., & Käser, T. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100368 · Cited by 164
The Role of Perceived Trust in Embracing Artificial Intelligence Technologies: Insights from SMEs
Alzboon, M. S., Al-Shorman, H. M., Alka’awneh, S. M. N., Saatchi, S. G., Alqaraleh, M. K. S., Samara, E. I. M., Wahed, M. K. Y. A., Mohammad, S. I., Al-Momani, A. M., & Haija, A. A. A. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74220-0_1 · Cited by 98
Artificial intelligence for higher education: benefits and challenges for pre-service teachers
Kalniņa, D., Nīmante, D., & Baranova, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1501819 · Cited by 162
Yim, I. H. Y., & Wegerif, R. (2024) · Future in Educational Research · doi:10.1002/fer3.65 · Cited by 130
Unveiling trust in AI: the interplay of antecedents, consequences, and cultural dynamics
Dang, Q., & Li, G. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02477-6 · Cited by 135
Runge, I., Hebibi, F., & Lazarides, R. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15020167 · Cited by 85
ChatGPT: The brightest student in the class
Cano, E. V., Ramírez‐Hurtado, J. M., López, J. M. S., & Menéses, E. L. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101380 · Cited by 105
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Wu, W., Kamran, F., & Wang, X. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7 · Cited by 102
Balaskas, S., Tsiantos, V., Chatzifotiou, S., & Rigou, M. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16020082 · Cited by 81
Bhat, M. A., Tiwari, C. K., Bhaskar, P., & Khan, S. T. (2024) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-03-2024-0033 · Cited by 97
Beyond the hype: exploring faculty perceptions and acceptability of AI in teaching practices
Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4 · Cited by 79
Feldman-Maggor, Y., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Alexandron, G. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00486-6 · Cited by 97
The Effects of Explanations in Automated Essay Scoring Systems on Student Trust and Motivation
Conijn, R., Kahr, P. K., & Snijders, C. C. P. (2023) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2023.7801 · Cited by 114
Ali, I., Warraich, N. F., & Butt, K. (2024) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669241257206 · Cited by 94
Yu-peng, L., & Yu, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2359222 · Cited by 84
Almenara, J. C., Palacios‐Rodríguez, A., Aguirre, M. I. L., & Abarca, P. S. A. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1497705 · Cited by 74
Gen-AI integration in higher education: Predicting intentions using SEM-ANN approach
Jain, K., & Raghuram, J. N. V. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12506-4 · Cited by 89
Almenara, J. C., Palacios‐Rodríguez, A., Aguirre, M. I. L., & de Rivas-Manzano, M. D. R. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14070740 · Cited by 126
Wang, F., Li, N., Cheung, A. C. K., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00547-9 · Cited by 69
The interplay between teachers’ trust in artificial intelligence and digital competence
Lucas, M., Zhang, Y., Bem‐Haja, P., & Vicente, P. N. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12772-2 · Cited by 141
Factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence systems: a systematic literature review
Khanfar, A. A. A., Mavi, R. K., Iranmanesh, M., & Gengatharen, D. E. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2023-0838 · Cited by 73
Wang, D., Bian, C., & Chen, G. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13466 · Cited by 77
Metaverse for Education: Developments, Challenges, and Future Direction
Chamola, V., Peelam, M. S., Mittal, U., Hassija, V., Singh, A., Pareek, R., Mangal, P., Sangwan, D., de Albuquerque, V. H. C., Mahmud, M., et al. (2025) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.70018 · Cited by 87
Lan, G., Feng, X., Du, S., Song, F., & Xiao, Q. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13427-6 · Cited by 82
Xu, S., Chen, P., & Zhang, G. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241290013 · Cited by 73
A Social Perspective on AI in the Higher Education System: A Semisystematic Literature Review
Alshahrani, B. T., Pileggi, S. F., & Karimi, F. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13081572 · Cited by 82
AI in STEM education: The relationship between teacher perceptions and ChatGPT use
Beege, M., Hug, C., & Nerb, J. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100494 · Cited by 50
Adelana, O. P., Ayanwale, M. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2310976 · Cited by 78
Bhaskar, P., Misra, P., & Chopra, G. (2024) · International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-11-2023-0220 · Cited by 60
Shi, L., Ding, A.-C. E., & Choi, I. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14111187 · Cited by 77
Development and validation of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale for Teachers (AILST)
Ning, Y., Zhang, W., Yao, D., Fang, B., Xu, B., & Wijaya, T. T. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13347-5 · Cited by 71
Cabellos, B., de Aldama, C., & Pozo, J. I. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468900 · Cited by 69
Zhao, X., You, W., Zheng, Z., Shi, S., Lu, Y., & Sun, L. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15030337 · Cited by 47
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12725-9 · Cited by 49
Sharma, S., & Singh, G. (2024) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-024-02558-7 · Cited by 53
Oved, O., & Alt, D. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13371-5 · Cited by 37
Adopting AI in education: optimizing human resource management considering teacher perceptions
Gârdan, I. P., Manu, M. B., Gârdan, D. A., Negoiţă, L., Paștiu, C. A., Ghiță, E., & Zaharia, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1488147 · Cited by 59
Velli, K., & Zafiropoulos, K. (2024) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe14090169 · Cited by 36
Guo, S., Shi, L., & Zhai, X. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13338-6 · Cited by 35
Wang, M., Chen, Z., Liu, Q., Peng, X., Long, T., & Shi, Y. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2365345 · Cited by 41
Factors influencing educators' AI adoption: A grounded meta-analysis review
Taheri, R., Nazemi, N., Pennington, S. E., Clark, J. A., & Dadgostari, F. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100464 · Cited by 63
Usage Motivations and User Categorizations of Metaverse: Their Impacts on Offline Activities
Hong, D., & Cho, C.-H. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2233133 · Cited by 32
Yuwono, E. I., Tjondronegoro, D., Riverola, C., & Loy, J. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100272 · Cited by 39
Augmented reality smart glasses use and acceptance: Α literature review
Koutromanos, G., & Kazakou, G. (2023) · Computers & Education X Reality · doi:10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100028 · Cited by 40
Lelescu, A., Sava, S., Grosseck, G., & Maliţa, L. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06253-1 · Cited by 43
Masry-Herzallah, A., & Makaldy, R. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100377 · Cited by 42
Technology Acceptance Model in Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Meta-Analysis
Xue, L., Mahat, J., & Ghazali, N. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251409441 · Cited by 61
Zuo, Z., Luo, Y., Yan, S., & Jiang, L. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13080664 · Cited by 29
The Perception of ChatGPT among Educators: Preliminary Findings
Oğurlu, Ü., & Mossholder, J. (2023) · Research in Social Sciences and Technology · doi:10.46303/ressat.2023.39 · Cited by 35
Wu, D., Zhang, X., Wang, K., Wu, L., & Yang, W. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10419-0 · Cited by 28
Elbaz, A. M., Salem, I. E., Darwish, A., Alkathiri, N. A., Mathew, V., & Al-Kaaf, H. A. (2024) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100324 · Cited by 41
Artificial intelligence in education: Next-gen teacher perspectives
National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, U. C. P., Samarescu, N., Bumbac, R., Bucharest University of Economic Studies, B., Zamfiroiu, A., Bucharest University of Economic Studies, B., Iorgulescu, M.-C., & Bucharest University of Economic Studies, B. (2024) · Amfiteatru Economic · doi:10.24818/ea/2024/65/145 · Cited by 28
Scrutinizing Indonesian pre-service teachers’ technological knowledge in utilizing AI-powered tools
Hastomo, T., Mandasari, B., & Widiati, U. (2024) · Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) · doi:10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21644 · Cited by 27
Unveiling the Drivers of AI Integration Among Language Teachers: Integrating UTAUT and AI-TPACK
Tram, N. H. M. (2024) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2024.2441155 · Cited by 39
Persist or Abandon? Exploring Chinese Users’ Continuance Intentions Toward AI Painting Tools
Xu, J., Ren, X., Huang, Y., Wu, R., & Pan, Y. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3424946 · Cited by 30
Zhang, H., & Cao, J. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25372-7 · Cited by 46
College Teachers’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Teaching Systems
Zhang, W., & Hou, Z. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3445909 · Cited by 33
Prikshat, V., Kumar, S., Patel, P., & Varma, A. (2024) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-04-2023-0303 · Cited by 40
Zulianti, H., Hastuti, H., Nurchurifiani, E., Hastomo, T., Maximilian, A., & Ajeng, G. D. (2024) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n3p117 · Cited by 57
Saklaki, A., & Gardikiotis, A. (2024) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc14120248 · Cited by 23
Ghimire, S. N., Bhattarai, U., & Baral, R. K. (2024) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2024.2366323 · Cited by 23
AI in the language classroom: Insights from pre-service English teachers
Yetkin, R., & Altınkaya, Z. Ö. (2024) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/20427530241267011 · Cited by 28
He, S., & Ren, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1571279 · Cited by 31
Aquilino, L., Dio, C. D., Manzi, F., Massaro, D., Bisconti, P., & Marchetti, A. (2025) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics12030070 · Cited by 33
Psychological safety and trust as drivers of teachers’ continued use of AI tools in classrooms
Shen, L., Qiu, N., & Wang, Z. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-13789-4 · Cited by 33
Mohammed, A. S. (2023) · American Journal of Education and Technology · doi:10.54536/ajet.v2i4.2201 · Cited by 38
Fernandez-Nieto, G. M., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Echeverria, V., Kitto, K., Gašević, D., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the 14th Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636930 · Cited by 22
Bridging expectations and reality: Addressing the price-value paradox in teachers' AI integration
Elyakim, N. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13466-z · Cited by 20
Song, X., Mak, J., & Chen, H. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251334545 · Cited by 20
The Effects of AI on Street-Level Bureaucracy: A Scoping Review
Gillingham, C., Morley, J., & Floridi, L. (2025) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-025-00178-7 · Cited by 24
Alhur, A. (2023) · Indonesian Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.24002/ijis.v5i2.6833 · Cited by 25
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11656-1 · Cited by 19
Lee, J.-C., & Xiong, L. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11884-5 · Cited by 21
Artificial Intelligence Versus Arab Universities: An Enquiry into the Saudi Context
Alenezi, F. Z. (2023) · Scientific Journal of King Faisal University Humanities and Management Sciences · doi:10.37575/h/edu/220038 · Cited by 18
Exploring the Acceptance of ChatGPT as a Learning Tool among Academicians: A Qualitative Study
Mukred, M., Mokhtar, U. A., & Hawash, B. (2023) · Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication · doi:10.17576/jkmjc-2023-3904-16 · Cited by 17
Kotsis, K. Τ. (2024) · EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods · doi:10.59652/jetm.v2i2.158 · Cited by 24
Çelik, İ., Muukkonen, H., & Siklander, P. (2025) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/14782103251348551 · Cited by 16
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2194927 · Cited by 16
Self-citationLi, D., Osman, S. B., Alhassora, N. S. A., Kumar, J. A., & Husain, S. K. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3585784 · Cited by 22
Enhancing or impairing? Exploring Indian EFL learners’ academic writing narratives with ChatGPT
Khan, R., Qamar, M. T., Ansari, M. S., & Yasmeen, J. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2514329 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Hyeoncheol
- Venue
- International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-04-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 910-922
- ISSN
- 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7590
- OpenAlex
- W4224229986
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 10
- FWCI
- 54.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Keywords
- teacher acceptance, pedagogical beliefs, perceived trust, constructivist beliefs, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, teacher perceptions, AI integration in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review