The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of Pedagogical Beliefs and Perceived Trust on Teachers’ Acceptance of Educational Artificial Intelligence Tools
Abstract
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have stimulated the development of educational AI tools (EAIT). EAITs intelligently assist teachers in formulating better pedagogical decisions or actions for their students. However, teachers are hardly integrating EAITs, and little is known about their perceptions of EAITs. This study seeks to identify human factors that encourage or restrict teachers’ acceptance of EAITs. We propose a revised technology acceptance model incorporating teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust in EAITs. Survey data were collected from 215 teachers in South Korea and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results indicate that teachers with constructivist beliefs are more likely to integrate EAITs than teachers with transmissive orientations. Furthermore, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived trust in EAITs are determinants to be considered when explaining teachers’ acceptance of EAITs. Among them, the most influential determinant of predicting their acceptance was found to be how easily the EAIT is constructed. Significant implications for researchers and stakeholders regarding the development and integration of EAITs are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the results of a study with teachers from South Korea indicate that teachers with constructivist beliefs are more likely to integrate educational AI-based tools than teachers with transmissive orientations [33].”
From ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021) · Classroom Companion: Business · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7 · Cited by 10,343
Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct
Pajares, M. F. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062003307 · Cited by 9,007
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · cited 1×
“These TAM-measuring items were adopted from Venkatesh and Bala (2008), which were based on Davis (1989).”
MethodReporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338 · Cited by 6,937 · cited 1×
“Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the measurement model and to assess convergent validity, reliability, and discriminant validity (Hair et al., 2010; Schreiber et al., 2006).”
MethodTeacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001 · Cited by 2,107
Shin, D. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 · Cited by 1,548
Explainable AI: From black box to glass box
Rai, A. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00710-5 · Cited by 1,317
Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549 · Cited by 1,266
Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education
Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3 · Cited by 1,229
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 · Cited by 1,146
Teacher beliefs and technology integration
Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C.-J., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2012) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005 · Cited by 940
Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., & Bellamy, R. K. E. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372852 · Cited by 895
Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians
Asan, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Choudhury, A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/15154 · Cited by 825
Kaldellis, A. (1999) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004452862_022 · Cited by 674
Sohn, K., & Kwon, O. (2020) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324 · Cited by 646
Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning
Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.002 · Cited by 640
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7 · Cited by 574
Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103732 · Cited by 546
Understanding the Effect of Accuracy on Trust in Machine Learning Models
Yin, M., Wortman Vaughan, J., & Wallach, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300509 · Cited by 527 · cited 1×
“In addition, Yin et al. (2019) demonstrated that users tend to trust AI more when they are informed about its performance.”
BackgroundUser acceptance of virtual reality: An extended technology acceptance model
Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Valléry, G. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612 · Cited by 493
Abbitt, J. T. (2011) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670 · Cited by 472
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Gordillo, J. J. T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057 · Cited by 458
Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives
Jeon, J. (2024) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.2021241 · Cited by 433
Education Policy Analysis Archives
(2014) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaav22n1.2014 · Cited by 427
Hwang, Y., & Kim, D. J. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.12.008 · Cited by 415
Juan, C. M., & Sallán, J. G. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x · Cited by 393
The adoption of software measures: A technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective
Wallace, L. G., & Sheetz, S. D. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.12.003 · Cited by 392
Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005 · Cited by 388
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.006 · Cited by 382
Petko, D. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013 · Cited by 357
Estriégana, R., Medina, J., & Barchino, R. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.010 · Cited by 357
Kim, J., Merrill, K., Xu, K., & Sellnow, D. D. (2020) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227 · Cited by 288
Understanding and predicting students' intention to use mobile cloud storage services
Arpacı, İ. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.067 · Cited by 281
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
(2013) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/10857.1573-1820 · Cited by 267
AI and education: the importance of teacher and student relations
Guilherme, A. A. (2017) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0693-8 · Cited by 254
Student Learning Benefits of a Mixed-Reality Teacher Awareness Tool in AI-Enhanced Classrooms
Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12 · Cited by 235
University Students’ Perception of Video-Based Learning in Times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF Perspective
Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164 · Cited by 223
Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant
du Boulay, B. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2016.93 · Cited by 213 · cited 1×
“In addition, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), which are among the most common forms of EAIT, provide personalized and automated feedbacks (Du Boulay, 2016; Holstein et al., 2018).”
BackgroundUnderstanding User Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Systems: Evidence from China
Qin, F., Li, K., & Yan, J. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12994 · Cited by 204
Chatbot-assisted dynamic assessment (CA-DA) for L2 vocabulary learning and diagnosis
Jeon, J. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1987272 · Cited by 202
Song, P., & Wang, X. (2020) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-020-09640-2 · Cited by 190
Liu, H., Lin, C., & Zhang, D. (2017) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572 · Cited by 181
Massive LMS log data analysis for the early prediction of course-agnostic student performance
Riestra-González, M., Ruiz, M. P. P., & Ortín, F. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104108 · Cited by 178
Pawar, U., O’Shea, D., Rea, S., & O’Reilly, R. (2020) · International Conference on Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (CyberSA) · doi:10.1109/cybersa49311.2020.9139655 · Cited by 175
Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety
Chiu, T. K. F., & Churchill, D. (2015) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709 · Cited by 174
Sánchez‐Prieto, J. C., Huang, F., Migueláñéz, S. O., García‐Peñalvo, F. J., & Teo, T. P. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12822 · Cited by 138
Training with ICT for ICT from the trainee’s perspective. A local ICT teacher training experience
Kalogiannakis, M. (2008) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9079-3 · Cited by 115
Sánchez‐Prieto, J. C., Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., & Peñalvo, F. J. G. (2020) · International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.9781/ijimai.2020.11.009 · Cited by 106
Perceived trust in artificial intelligence technologies: A preliminary study
Bitkina, O. V., Jeong, H., Lee, B. C., Park, J., Park, J., & Kim, H. K. (2020) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20839 · Cited by 86
Self-citationDoes it matter being innovative: Teachers’ technology acceptance
Akar, S. G. M. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies : Official Journal of the IFIP technical committee on Education · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09933-z · Cited by 81
Alexandrakis, D., Chorianopoulos, K., & Tselios, N. K. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1768673 · Cited by 70
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Virvou, M. K. (2019) · Intelligent systems reference library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4_2 · Cited by 45
THE EXPLORATION OF A MACHINE LEARNING APPROACH FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING STYLES CHANGES
Wei, Y., Yang, Q., Chen, J., & Hu, J. (2018) · Control and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.2316/journal.201.2018.3.201-2979 · Cited by 34
Johal, W., Castellano, G., Tanaka, F., & Okita, S. Y. (2018) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-018-0481-8 · Cited by 34
Between living and nonliving: Young children’s animacy judgments and reasoning about humanoid robots
Kim, M.-K., Yi, S.-H., & Lee, D. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216869 · Cited by 31
Barriers to ITS Adoption: A Systematic Mapping Study
Nye, B. D. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_74 · Cited by 20
Tracing College Students’ Acceptance of Online Health Services
Mou, J., Shin, D., & Cohen, J. F. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2016.1244941 · Cited by 18
Truth, Lies, and Videotapes: Embracing the Contraries of Mathematics Teaching
Crespo, S. M. (2016) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/687807 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.14507/epaa.v8n51.2000 · DOI
- 10.1080/10447318.2021.1970430 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5 · DOI
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Pearson.
- Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2015). Deep knowledge tracing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015-Janua, 505–513.
- 10.1145/3362789.3362918 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3313831.3376416 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5er8f · Cited by 7,552
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326
“Important steps to responsibly mitigate such an issue can be the following: • Asking the authors of the original documents trans-parently (i.e., purpose and policy of data usage) for permission to use their content for training the model”
BackgroundCelik, I. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468 · Cited by 1,012
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1 · Cited by 696
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Hyeoncheol
- Venue
- International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-04-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 910-922
- ISSN
- 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7590
- OpenAlex
- W4224229986
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 10
- FWCI
- 54.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Keywords
- teacher acceptance, pedagogical beliefs, perceived trust, constructivist beliefs, technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, teacher perceptions, AI integration in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
