The DOI matches its Crossref record; 140 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach
Abstract
The persuasion literature has examined several mechanisms that have contributed to understanding the effectiveness of credible, attractive, similar, and powerful sources. These traditionally studied processes focus on how persuasive sources can affect attitudes by serving as peripheral cues or by influencing the direction or the amount of thoughts generated. After describing these processes that operate at the primary level of cognition, we review research on self-validation that demonstrates how and when source factors can affect a secondary cognition—thought confidence. Thought confidence refers to a metacognitive form of cognition. This recently discovered mechanism can account for some already established persuasion outcomes (e.g., more persuasion with high- than low-credibility or similar sources), but by a completely different process than postulated previously. Moreover, under some circumstances we have also been able to obtain findings opposite to those typically observed (e.g., more persuasion with low- than high-credible or similar sources). Our research reveals that a consideration of self-validation processes provides an integrative mechanism for understanding many other unexplored source variables, such as oneself as a source, source matching and mimicry, and threatening sources.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“based on a well-established body of literature in persuasion demonstrating that aspects of a message’s source can influence the persuasiveness of the message (Briñol & Petty, 2009; Kumkale et al., 2010; Pornpitakpan, 2004; Wilson & Sherrell, 1993), the source of a fear appeal communication should be an important moderator for fear appeal effectiveness.”
From Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories (2015) · cites this paper as Briñol & Petty, 2009
In the citing paper
“Decades of research has found that, whether recipients are motivated to think carefully or not 142 , sources perceived as credible are more persuasive 143 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [143]
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Aronson E., 1969, Advances in experimental social psychology, 4, 1
- Briñol P., 2008, The origin of thoughts in persuasion
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
- Chaiken S., 1989, Unintended thought, 212
- DeMarree K. G., 2008, Assimilation and contrast of facial expressions: A self-validation approach
- Horcajo J., 2008, Minority influence: A new look from the self-validation perspective
- Kruglanski A. W., 2005, Advances in experimental social psychology, 37, 346
- Moscovici S., 1980, Advances in experimental social psychology, 13, 209
- Newcomb T. M., 1968, Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook, 28
- Petty R. E., 2009, Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures, 119
- Petty R. E., 2008, Watchdog: A new look from the implicit ambivalence perspective
- Petty R. E., 1995, Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences
- Wegener D. T., 1997, Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 141
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–243 of 243
O marketing das notícias : consumo de informações online, persuasão e confiança
Ribeiro, G. S. (2016) · RIUnB Institutional Repository (University of Brasília) · doi:10.26512/2016.03.d.21329
The Persuasive Characteristics of Teachers on Conceptual Change across Health Classrooms
Gray, D. L. (2009) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Παπαστάμου, Σ., & Prodromitis, G. (2019) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.40
Jurković, E., & Ivanec, D. (2019) · Psihologijske teme · doi:10.31820/pt.28.2.6
Adams, Z. (2018) · Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London)
Determinants of influence in electronic word of mouth communication within Facebook
Stone, R. J. (2020) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham)
Çam, M. S. (2021) · Medya ve Din Araştırmaları Dergisi · doi:10.47951/mediad.1021794
Teoria do Comportamento Planejado como Preditora do Isolamento Social por Sars-CoV-2
Natividade, J. C., Londero‐Santos, A., Novaes, F. C., de Carvalho, N. M., Bastos, R. V. S., & Marot, T. A. (2022) · Revista Psicologia e Saúde · doi:10.20435/pssa.v13i4.1369
Madsen, J. K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22145-4_4
Exploring links between social learning and persuasion: The role of credibilityPreprint
Kasran, S., Hughes, S., & Houwer, J. D. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/v596x
The intentions of information sources can affect what information people think qualifies as truePreprint
Handley-Miner, I. J., Pope, M., Atkins, R. K., Jones-Jang, S. M., McKaughan, D. J., Phillips, J., & Young, L. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wf87u
A Network Approach to Investigate the Dynamics of Individual and Collective BeliefsPreprint
Vlasceanu, M., Dyckovsky, A. M., & Coman, A. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9npq6
Communicating About Healthy Eating
Catellani, P., & Carfora, V. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35070-2_7
Morality as the Enduring Basis of Public Opinion
Bloom, P. B. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541296.013.17 · Cited by 1
Demus, A., Holynska, K., & Marcinek, K. (2023) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rra2032-1 · Cited by 1
Efficacious methods of restraining COVID-19 through behavioral public policy
Управителев, А. А. (2023) · Journal of the New Economic Association · doi:10.31737/22212264_2023_4_203-222
Rational Belief Updating in the Face of Misinformation: The Role of Source ReliabilityPreprint
Sanna, G. A., & Lagnado, D. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4907730
Seeds of Change: Exploring Digital Storytelling in Sustainable Cotton YouTube Videos
Gustin, H., Rinehart, K., & Fischer, L. (2025) · Journal of Agricultural Education · doi:10.5032/jae.v66i4.3234
Social perceptions of misinformation sources and memory
Shao, Y. (2025) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01793-y
The Role of Harm, Misinformer Age, and Information Scrutiny on Adolescents’ Trust in Misinformation
Farooq, A., Rutland, A., & McGuire, L. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.11106
Påverkan av auktoritet : Berömmelse ingen faktor som övertygar
Illi, P. (2013) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library)
The Influence of Justification Content and Argument Source on Perceived Argument Quality
Herne, K., Sipinen, J., Söderlund, P. J., & Kestilä‐Kekkonen, E. (2026) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-026-09694-3
Brief and Effective: Media Literacy Tips Improve Fake News Discernment
Lorko, M., Čavojová, V., & Šrol, J. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf067
Information Provision and Vaccination Behaviour
Martorellet, J. A., Saccardo, S., & Chapman, G. (2025) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781529674743.n30
Spearing, E. R., Jankauskas, J. G., Newman, E. J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2026) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-026-00725-x
Butler, L. H., & Swire‐Thompson, B. (2026) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.70143
Tamisier, D. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/65fad24dza108z4390zb780z550f1aecd5b9 · Cited by 1
Quiamzade, A., Lalot, F., & Abrams, D. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104927
GURU POFESIONAL DALAM PANDANGAN ISLAM
Misnan, M., Hanafiah, M., & Hadi, A. (2026) · BIOTIK: Scientific Journal of Biology Technology and Education (Indonesian Institute of Sciences) · doi:10.22373/4h769p38
Mattavelli, S. (2026) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2026.2694208
Investigating social cues and pre-assessment criteria for reusing social science data
Xiang, Y., Ma, X., Qin, C., Liu, D., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515261458171
Chen, C., Ren, N., & Guo, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1877483
The Persuasive Cost of Mental Health Message Fatigue
Ji, A., Paltaratskaya, V., & Wise, K. R. (2026) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2026.2712999
Virtanen, O. J., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2026) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976261467299
Can Human Values Predict Engagement with Conspiratorial and False Content on Social Media?
Christodoulou, V., Papapolydorou, N., Vos, M. D., & Iordanou, K. (2026) · European Journal of Psychology Open · doi:10.1024/2673-8627/a000111
Nah, H. S., Feng, Y., & Song, Y. G. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7615114
Metadata
- Authors
- Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Briñol, Pablo
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-96
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2012300024
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
- Keywords
- source credibility, persuasion, self-validation, metacognition, source similarity, source attractiveness, source power, source matching, mimicry, attitude change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review