Cited by 5Augmented Reality ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Technology in Learning

Triadic fusion: investigating the educational impact of AI, AR, and NLP integration in creating immersive and conversational learning environments

Samala, Agariadne Dwinggo, Rawas, Soha·2026·Interactive Learning Environments

Abstract

This study introduces Triadic Fusion—a novel framework that integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI), Augmented Reality (AR), and Natural Language Processing (NLP) to create immersive and conversational learning environments. Unlike existing multimodal or cross-technology models, Triadic Fusion is grounded in constructivist, socio-cultural, and cognitive load theories, aligning technological orchestration with pedagogical intent across cognitive, contextual, and communicative domains. Using a mixed-methods approach, we studied 120 students and 10 educators through pre- and post-assessments, surveys, classroom observations, and interviews. The framework was applied across diverse disciplines and educational levels. Results demonstrated that Triadic Fusion significantly enhanced student engagement, content comprehension, and collaborative learning outcomes. Educators reported improvements in personalization and interactive teaching. This research contributes both theoretically and practically by differentiating Triadic Fusion from prior models and demonstrating its empirical benefits. It offers actionable insights for educators, technologists, and policymakers developing the next generation of immersive educational technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2025.2554987

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samala, A. D., & Rawas, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
  • Beirut Arab University (LB)
Corresponding author
Samala, Agariadne Dwinggo
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2025-09-06
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
2794-2809
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
OpenAlex
W4414035926
Cited by
5
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, augmented reality, natural language processing, immersive learning environments, conversational learning, constructivism, sociocultural theory, cognitive load theory, student engagement, cooperative learning, personalized learning, educational technology integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review