Cited by 150Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in attachment representations during psychological therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This review systematically examines research that investigates changes in adult attachment representations during psychological therapy. METHOD: Studies from two adult attachment approaches are reviewed (interview and self-report) with the aim of concluding whether psychotherapy can improve attachment representations. To guide the interpretation of findings, the methodological quality of studies is assessed. RESULTS: The results suggest that attachment security increases following therapy, whereas attachment anxiety decreases following therapy. Findings are unclear with regard to attachment avoidance. Improvements are observed across different methodologies, patient groups, therapeutic approaches, and therapy settings. Findings also appear to be consistent across different levels of study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, research supports the suggestion that attachment styles may alter during the course of psychotherapy, but further controlled trials are required to confirm this conclusion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2014.886791

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037//0022-0006X.64.2.264 · DOI
  3. 10.1037//0022-0006X.64.2.264 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.826 · DOI
  5. Dozier M., 1990, Development and Psychotherapy, 2, 47
  6. 10.1037//0022-0006X.64.2.264 · DOI
  7. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence, 2009, National Clinical Practice Guideline Number 78
  8. Shaver P. R., 2011, The handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic intervention, 17
  9. Weinfield N. S., 1999, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical application, 68

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 150

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, P., Rietzschel, J., Danquah, A., & Berry, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Peter
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2014-02-21
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
222-238
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2019674006
Cited by
150
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment representations, adult attachment, psychotherapy outcome, attachment security, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, attachment styles, therapeutic change
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Object Attachment, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review