Cited by 30Personality Disorders and PsychopathologySuicide and Self-Harm StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

What changes when? The course of improvement during a stage-based treatment for suicidal and self-injuring women with borderline personality disorder and PTSD

Open access
Harned, Melanie S., Gallop, Robert J., Valenstein-Mah, Helen R.·2018·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) with the DBT Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE) protocol is an integrated treatment for suicidal and self-injuring individuals with PTSD and borderline personality disorder (BPD) that occurs in three stages: Stage 1 targets behavioral dyscontrol, Stage 2 targets posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) via the DBT PE protocol, and Stage 3 addresses remaining problems. We evaluated the course of change in multiple outcomes across these three stages and compared them to changes found in DBT alone. METHOD: Participants were 38 women with BPD, PTSD and recent suicidal and/or non-suicidal self-injury. Data were collected weekly or bi-weekly to assess PTSD, BPD, global well-being, state dissociation, and urges to engage in problem behaviors. RESULTS: In DBT + DBT PE, there was a significant improvement in PTSD in Stage 2 and in PTSD, BPD, and state dissociation in Stage 3. Compared to DBT, DBT + DBT PE led to significantly higher global well-being and moderately, but non-significantly, lower PTSD and BPD in Stages 2 and/or 3. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD does not improve until it is directly targeted and changes in other comorbid problems occur after PTSD is treated. Adding the DBT PE protocol to DBT was associated with improvement rather than worsening of outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2016.1252865

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DBT + DBT PE was associated with improvement in social adjustment, health-related quality of life, and overall functioning-but only after PTSD symptoms and related cognitions were reduced.

    “DBT + DBT PE also was associated with improvement in social adjustment, health-related quality of life, and overall functioning—but only after PTSD symptoms and related cognitions were reduced [62, 64].”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results (Hypothesis 1 and 2; page unavailable) report PTSD symptom reductions during Stage 2 and higher global well-being with DBT + DBT PE in Stages 2 and 3. The paper does not report improvements in social adjustment, health-related quality of life, or overall functioning, and it does not establish that those outcomes improved only after PTSD-related cognitions were reduced. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adding PTSD trauma memory processing to DBT had some benefits, but most women receiving that intervention either dropped out or had limited improvement in PTSD or BPD symptoms.

    “Thus, adding PTSD trauma memory processing to DBT had some benefits, but most women receiving that intervention either dropped out or had limited improvement in PTSD or BPD symptoms.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results report significant PTSD improvement in Stage 2 and significant PTSD and BPD improvement in Stage 3, supporting the claim that adding trauma processing had benefits. But Methods > Subject Flow and Retention reports that only 1 of 18 women who started DBT PE dropped out and 13 completed it; the paper does not establish that most recipients had limited PTSD or BPD improvement. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The three most extensively tested approaches to PTSD psychotherapy (EX, CT, and EMDR) have been systematically integrated with DBT.

    “Thus, the three most extensively tested approaches to PTSD psychotherapy (EX, CT, and EMDR) have been systematically integrated with DBT.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Methods (Treatment Groups; page not supplied) describe a systematic integration of prolonged exposure (EX) with DBT. The passages do not establish that cognitive therapy (CT) or EMDR were integrated with DBT, or that these three approaches are the most extensively tested PTSD psychotherapies. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PTSD was found to improve only when trauma memory processing was initiated.

    “PTSD was found to improve only when trauma memory processing was initiated.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

  • DBT + DBT PE was not associated with significantly greater reductions than DBT alone in PTSD, BPD, or dissociation symptoms or urges to commit suicide or self-harm.

    “Although DBT + DBT PE was associated with higher levels of general well-being than DBT alone, DBT + DBT PE was not associated with significantly greater reductions than DBT alone in PTSD, BPD, or dissociation symptoms or urges to commit suicide or self-harm.”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW 1995 Structured clinical interview for axis I DSM-IV disorders - patient edition (SCID-I/P) New York Biometrics Research Department, NY State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harned, M. S., Gallop, R. J., & Valenstein-Mah, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • West Chester University (US)
Corresponding author
Harned, Melanie S.
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2016-11-03
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
761-775
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W2546519430
Cited by
30
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH082143)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidal behavior, non-suicidal self-injury, women, treatment phases, state dissociation, global well-being, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Suicide, Attempted, Self-Injurious Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review