Cited by 199Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Axis I Dissociative Disorder Comorbidity in Borderline Personality Disorder and Reports of Childhood Trauma

Sar, Vedat, Akyuz, Gamze, Kugu, Nesim, Ozturk, Erdinc, Ertem-Vehid, Hayriye·2006·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the dissociative disorder comorbidity of borderline personality disorder and its relation to childhood trauma reports in a nonclinical population. Method In April 2003, 1301 college students were screened for borderline personality disorder using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and Steinberg's dissociation questionnaires were also administered. During May and June 2003, 80 students with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and 111 nonborderline students were evaluated using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders by an interviewer blind to the diagnosis and scores obtained during the first phase. Results The prevalence of borderline personality disorder was 8.5%. A significant majority (72.5%; 58/80) of the borderline personality disorder group had a dissociative disorder, whereas this rate was only 18.0% (20/111) for the comparison group (p Conclusion A significant proportion of subjects with borderline personality disorder have a comorbid dissociative disorder. Lack of interaction between dissociative disorder and borderline personality disorder diagnoses for any type of childhood trauma contradicts the opinion that both disorders together might be a single disorder. Recognizing highly prevalent but usually neglected Axis I dissociative disorder comorbidity in patients with borderline personality disorder may contrib…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v67n1014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sar, V., Akyuz, G., Kugu, N., Ozturk, E., & Ertem-Vehid, H.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2006-10-15
Volume
67
Issue
10
Pages
1583-1590
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073230377
Cited by
199
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, dissociative disorders, comorbidities, childhood trauma, childhood emotional abuse, child sexual abuse, physical neglect, emotional neglect, university students, non-clinical population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review