Cited by 73Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Meditation in a Deep South Prison: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Vipassana

Perelman, Abigayl M., Miller, Sarah L., Clements, Carl B., Rodriguez, Amy, Allen, Kathryn, Cavanaugh, Ron·2012·Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Abstract

In an era marked by pronounced overcrowding, including an increasing number of offenders serving long-term sentences, correctional systems continue to search for innovative and effective treatments. Few jurisdictions have attempted non-Western approaches such as meditative practice to reduce stress, conflict, and rule infractions. The current study examined the psychological and behavioral effects of intensive ten-day Vipassana Meditation (VM) retreats in a maximum security prison. VM goals and practice are consistent with evidence-based methods such as cognitive behavioral treatment and Risk-Need-Responsivity principles, as well as newer conceptions such as the Good Lives Model. Long-term offenders were followed over a one-year period. These included three retreat cohorts (n = 60) as well as an alternative treatment comparison group (n = 67). Pretreatment measures assessed mindfulness, anger, emotional intelligence, and mood states. Baseline rates of prison infractions, segregation time, and health visits were also recorded. VM participants achieved enhanced levels of mindfulness and emotional intelligence and had decreased mood disturbance relative to a comparison group. Both groups' rates of behavioral infractions were reduced at one-year follow-up. Clinically, VM holds promise for addressing self-regulation and impulse control, among other barriers to prisoner adjustment and community reentry. Additional study of VM across diverse offender groups is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10509674.2011.632814

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prison-based mindfulness studies have typically used intensive retreats with prisoners physically separated from the general population.

    “Prison-based studies of mindfulness have typically been intensive retreats during which participating prisoners are physically separated from the general population (Bowen et al., 2006, Perelman et al., 2012).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention in a Jail Drug Treatment Program. (2019) · cites this paper as Perelman et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perelman, A. M., Miller, S. L., Clements, C. B., Rodriguez, A., Allen, K., & Cavanaugh, R.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Perelman, Abigayl M.
Venue
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
Published
2012-04
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
176-198
ISSN
  • 0364-3093 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-9674
  • 1540-8558
OpenAlex
W2041796856
Cited by
73
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
Vipassana meditation, offender rehabilitation, mindfulness, emotional intelligence, anger, mood disturbance, segregation, self-regulation, impulse control, maximum security prisons, reentry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review