Cited by 404Psychometric Methodologies and TestingOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace

Schwarzer, Ralf, Mueller, John, Greenglass, Esther·1999·Anxiety, Stress & Coping

Abstract

General perceived self-efficacy pertains to optimistic beliefs about being able to cope with a large variety of stressors. It is measured with a ten-item scale that has proven useful in cross-cultural research. Previous findings suggest that the construct is universal and that it applies to the majority of cultures worldwide. The present investigation adds a new facet to it: can perceived self-efficacy be measured as part of an interactive computer session while surfing the Internet? A total of 1,437 computer users responded to a survey on the web, half of them young men and women below the age of 26. These data were compared to 290 Canadian university students, 274 teachers in Germany, and 3,077 high school students in Germany. It turned out that all psychometric characteristics were satisfactory. Some evidence for validity emerged. It is suggested that innovative methods of data collection be considered when developing a psychometric scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615809908248327

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Venue
Anxiety, Stress & Coping
Published
1999-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
145-161
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2122740186
Cited by
404
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 22
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
self-efficacy scale, online data collection, online assessment, psychometric validation, scale development, cross-cultural measurement, young adults, university students, teachers, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review