Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 57 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Electrosprayed minocycline hydrochloride-loaded microsphere/SAIB hybrid depot for periodontitis treatment

Open access
Zhang, Ting, Qiu, Yingqian, Song, Jinlin, Zhou, Pengfei, Liao, Hang, Cheng, Yuting, Wu, Xiaohong·2021·Drug Delivery

Abstract

Minocycline hydrochloride (MINO) has been one of the most frequently used antibiotics in the treatment of periodontitis due to its antibacterial activity and osteogenesis effects; however, high levels of MINO administered during the treatment halt the formation of new bone. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to prepare a MINO-microsphere/sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB) hybrid depot to reduce the burst release of MINO and ensure antibacterial and osteogenesis effects of MINO in the treatment of periodontitis. Uniform microspheres, approximately 5 µm size, with a slightly rough surface and different MINO loading (10, 12, and 14%) were prepared, and the microspheres were added into SAIB, after which the burst release significantly decreased from 66.18 to 2.92%, from 71.82 to 3.82%, and from 73.35 to 4.45%, respectively, and the release from all the MINO-microspheres/SAIB hybrid depots lasted for 77 days. In addition, cytotoxicity test showed that the MINO-microsphere with 12% drug loading promoted the proliferation of osteoblasts the most and was subsequently used in vivo experiments. Moreover, in the model of ligatured-induced periodontitis in SD rats, the MINO-microsphere/SAIB hybrid depot not only significantly increased the alveolar bone height and bone volume but also reduced the inflammation of the periodontal tissue. Additionally, it also inhibited the expression of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) and promoted the expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG).. These results indicated that the MINO-microsphere/SAIB hybrid depot might be promising in the treatment of periodontitis.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

A minocycline hydrochloride (MINO)-loaded PLGA/PEG microsphere/sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB) hybrid depot was developed to reduce MINO burst release while retaining antibacterial and osteogenic effects for periodontitis. In ligature-induced periodontitis in SD rats, the depot improved alveolar bone outcomes and reduced periodontal inflammation compared with ligation controls.

Key findings

  • Adding MINO-microspheres to SAIB markedly reduced first-day burst release: from 66.18 to 2.92%, from 71.82 to 3.82%, and from 73.35 to 4.45% (abstract; the results section reports the third pair as 73.75 to 4.45%), with release lasting 77 days.
  • The 12% MINO-microsphere group promoted osteoblast proliferation the most in CCK-8 assays and was selected for in vivo testing.
  • In SD rats with ligature-induced periodontitis, the MINO-microsphere/SAIB depot significantly increased alveolar bone height and bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) and reduced periodontal tissue inflammation versus ligation and ligation + M-SAIB groups.
  • The depot inhibited RANKL expression and promoted OPG expression at 3 and 6 weeks.

Methods

  • MINO-loaded PLGA/PEG microspheres (0%, 10%, 12%, and 14% w/w MINO relative to PLGA) were prepared by electrospraying, characterized by SEM, UV-Vis, contact angle, confocal microscopy, DSC, and FTIR, then dispersed into SAIB/ethanol to form hybrid depots.
  • In vitro release, degradation, and porosity were measured over time; osteoblast cytotoxicity/proliferation was assessed by CCK-8 using rat calvarial osteoblasts.
  • In vivo, 7-week-old female SD rats were assigned to five groups (n = 5): control, ligation, ligation + M-SAIB, ligation + MINO-M-SAIB, and ligation + Periocline®; outcomes included periodontal parameters, micro-CT, H&E histology, and immunohistochemistry for OPG/RANKL, analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Student–Newman–Keuls test.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the study is preclinical only, using in vitro assays and a rat ligature-induced periodontitis model, with n = 5 per group and endpoints at 3 and 6 weeks; no human clinical, long-term safety, or systemic exposure data are reported.
  • The abstract and results section report slightly different burst-release values for the third microsphere group (73.35% vs 73.75%), which the text does not reconcile.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10717544.2021.1902020

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1. (A) SEM images of microspheres at 800 times (a, c, e, g) and 7000 times (b, d, f, h), including M (a, b), M1 (c, d), M2 (e, f), and M3(g, h). (B) Diameter distribution images of M (a), M1 (b), M2 (c), and M3 (d) (n = 100).
Figure 1. (A) SEM images of microspheres at 800 times (a, c, e, g) and 7000 times (b, d, f, h), including M (a, b), M1 (c, d), M2 (e, f), and M3(g, h). (B) Diameter distribution images of M (a), M1 (b), M2 (c), and M3 (d) (n = 100).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. (A) Contact angle of microspheres of M (a), M1 (b), M2 (c), M3 (d). (B) Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of M1 (a), M2 (b), M3 (c). Composite picture, bright field picture and fluorescent picture from left to right, respectively (scale bar= 25 μm). (C) DSC thermograms of PEG, PLGA, MINO, MINO-microspheres. (D) FTIR spectra of PEG, PLGA, SAIB, MINO, MINO-microspheres, MINO-M-SAIB.
Figure 2. (A) Contact angle of microspheres of M (a), M1 (b), M2 (c), M3 (d). (B) Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of M1 (a), M2 (b), M3 (c). Composite picture, bright field picture and fluorescent picture from left to right, respectively (scale bar= 25 μm). (C) DSC thermograms of PEG, PLGA, MINO, MINO-microspheres. (D) FTIR spectra of PEG, PLGA, SAIB, MINO, MINO-microspheres, MINO-M-SAIB.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. (A) In vitro release from MINO-microspheres. (B) In vitro release from depots. (C) In vitro degradation of MINO-microspheres. (D) The porosity of depots. The results represent the average ± SD (n = 3 for release, degradation and porosity).
Figure 3. (A) In vitro release from MINO-microspheres. (B) In vitro release from depots. (C) In vitro degradation of MINO-microspheres. (D) The porosity of depots. The results represent the average ± SD (n = 3 for release, degradation and porosity).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. CCK-8 assays of cells cultured with the extracts of MINO-microspheres and the depots. The data represented the mean ± SD, n = 3, *p < .05.
Figure 4. CCK-8 assays of cells cultured with the extracts of MINO-microspheres and the depots. The data represented the mean ± SD, n = 3, *p < .05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. (A) Three-dimensional micro-CT images (buccal and palatal view) of the maxilla first molars alveolar bone level in different groups at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. (B) Bi-dimensional(2D) images of the maxilla first molars alveolar bone level in different groups at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. (C) Analysis of micro-CT volumetric parameters: bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. (D) Analysis of micro-ct linear bone loss: alveolar bone loss (ABL) at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. The data represented the mean ± SD, n = 5, *p < .05.
Figure 5. (A) Three-dimensional micro-CT images (buccal and palatal view) of the maxilla first molars alveolar bone level in different groups at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. (B) Bi-dimensional(2D) images of the maxilla first molars alveolar bone level in different groups at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. (C) Analysis of micro-CT volumetric parameters: bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. (D) Analysis of micro-ct linear bone loss: alveolar bone loss (ABL) at 3 weeks and 6 weeks. The data represented the mean ± SD, n = 5, *p < .05.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6. (A) The photographs of periodontal tissue in different groups at 0, 2, 4, 6 weeks. (B) The values of PD for the maxillary first molar in different groups. (C) The values of GI for the maxillary first molar in different groups. The data represented the mean ± SD, n = 5.
Figure 6. (A) The photographs of periodontal tissue in different groups at 0, 2, 4, 6 weeks. (B) The values of PD for the maxillary first molar in different groups. (C) The values of GI for the maxillary first molar in different groups. The data represented the mean ± SD, n = 5.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7. Histological observation (H&E stain) of maxillary periodontal tissue after 3 and 6 weeks (40 × magnification, bar= 500 μm). ABC: Alveolar bone crest; PL: Periodontal ligament; D: Dentin.
Figure 7. Histological observation (H&E stain) of maxillary periodontal tissue after 3 and 6 weeks (40 × magnification, bar= 500 μm). ABC: Alveolar bone crest; PL: Periodontal ligament; D: Dentin.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8. IHC staining and the corresponding quantitative analysis of OPG and RANKL after 3 and 6 weeks (400 × magnification, bar = 20 μm). The results represent the mean ± SD, n = 3, *p < .05.
Figure 8. IHC staining and the corresponding quantitative analysis of OPG and RANKL after 3 and 6 weeks (400 × magnification, bar = 20 μm). The results represent the mean ± SD, n = 3, *p < .05.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 39 Not checked · 93 Own results and interpretations

70 more claims

Create a free account to see all 132 claims and to verify the 28 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 49
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 11

Create a free account to see these claims.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

5 of 6 · the rest aren’t loaded

1 more finding

Create a free account to see every finding of this check.

See all findings — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1080/10717544.2019.1568620 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, T., Qiu, Y., Song, J., Zhou, P., Liao, H., Cheng, Y., & Wu, X.
Affiliations
  • Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
  • Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
Corresponding author
Wu, Xiaohong
Venue
Drug Delivery
Published
2021-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
620-633
ISSN
  • 1071-7544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0464
OpenAlex
W3147019705
Cited by
36
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Delivery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81970914)
  • Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
minocycline hydrochloride, periodontitis, electrospraying, microspheres, sucrose acetate isobutyrate, sustained drug release, burst release, bone formation, osteoblast proliferation, alveolar bone regeneration, RANKL, osteoprotegerin, ligature-induced periodontitis, periodontal inflammation
MeSH terms
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Implants, Microspheres, Minocycline, Osteoblasts, Osteogenesis, Periodontitis, Sucrose, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Osteoprotegerin, Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B, Drug Liberation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrosprayed minocycline hydrochloride-loaded microsphere/SAIB hybrid depot for periodontitis treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10717544.2021.1902020
The paper
Zhang, T., Qiu, Y., Song, J., Zhou, P., Liao, H., Cheng, Y., & Wu, X. (2021). Electrosprayed minocycline hydrochloride-loaded microsphere/SAIB hybrid depot for periodontitis treatment. Drug Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1902020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.