Cited by 243Impact of Technology on AdolescentsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsStudent Stress and Coping

Communication Competence, Social Support, and Depression Among College Students: A Model of Facebook and Face-to-Face Support Network Influence

Wright, Kevin B., Rosenberg, Jenny, Egbert, Nicole, Ploeger, Nicole A., Bernard, Daniel R., King, Shawn·2013·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

This study examined the influence of the social networking site Facebook and face-to-face support networks on depression among (N = 361) college students. The authors used the Relational Health Communication Competence Model as a framework for examining the influence of communication competence on social support network satisfaction and depression. Moreover, they examined the influence of interpersonal and social integrative motives as exogenous variables. On the basis of previous work, the authors propose and test a theoretical model using structural equation modeling. The results indicated empirical support for the model, with interpersonal motives predicting increased face-to-face and computer-mediated competence, increased social support satisfaction with face-to-face and Facebook support, and lower depression scores. The implications of the findings for theory, key limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2012.688250

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, K. B., Rosenberg, J., Egbert, N., Ploeger, N. A., Bernard, D. R., & King, S.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Kent State University (US)
  • University of Arkansas at Little Rock (US)
  • Christopher Newport University (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Kevin B.
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2012-10-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
41-57
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2024646599
Cited by
242
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
35.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
communication competence, social support, depression, university students, Facebook, social networking sites, interpersonal motives, computer-mediated communication, social support satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Communication, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Social Support, Students, Universities, Southwestern United States, Young Adult, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review