Cited by 142Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice

Open access
Vyth, Ellis L, Steenhuis, Ingrid HM, Vlot, Jessica A, Wulp, Anouk, Hogenes, Meefa G, Looije, Danielle H, Brug, Johannes, Seidell, Jacob C·2010·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: A front-of-pack nutrition logo on products with relatively favourable product compositions might help consumers to make more healthful choices. Studies investigating actual nutrition label use in point-of-purchase settings are scarce. The present study investigates the use of the ‘Choices’ nutrition logo in Dutch supermarkets. Design: Adults were asked to complete a validated questionnaire about motivation for food choice and their purchased products were scored for the Choices logo after they had done their shopping. Setting: Nine supermarkets in The Netherlands. Subjects: A total of 404 respondents participated. Results: Of the respondents, 62 % reported familiarity with the logo. The motivations for food choice that were positively associated with actually purchasing products with the logo were attention to ‘weight control’ and ‘product information’. The food choice motive ‘hedonism’ was negatively associated with purchasing products with the logo. Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate actual use of the Choices logo. In order to stimulate consumers to purchase more products with a favourable product composition, extra attention should be paid to hedonistic aspects such as the tastefulness and the image of healthy products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1368980010000637

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stockley L (2007) Review of 'Front of Pack' Nutrition Schemes. Brussels: European Heart Network.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vyth, E. L., Steenhuis, I. H., Vlot, J. A., Wulp, A., Hogenes, M. G., Looije, D. H., Brug, J., & Seidell, J. C.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
Corresponding author
Vyth, Ellis L
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
1882-1889
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2157509024
Cited by
142
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
front-of-pack nutrition labels, food choice motives, label use, hedonism
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Female, Food Labeling, Food Preferences, Food Supply, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Nutrition Policy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review