Cited by 124Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer Packaging Perceptions and TrendsGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the International Choices Programme

Open access
Roodenburg, A J C, Popkin, B M, Seidell, J C·2011·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A global push to reduce the amount of saturated and trans-fatty acids, added salt and sugar in processed food, and to enhance fruit, vegetable and whole grain intake, while limiting energy intake, exists for most populations. OBJECTIVES: To redesign the International Choices Program (note: this is unrelated to the US Smart Choices Program), initially Netherlands focused, by an international board of scientists to create a generic, global front-of-pack nutrition logo system that helps consumers make healthier food choices and stimulates product reformulation. METHODS: The Programme is a product-group-specific-nutrient-profiling approach with a distinction between basic and discretionary foods. The basic product groups are main contributors of essential and beneficial nutrients, and are based on food-based dietary guidelines from more than 20 countries across the globe. Generic criteria are derived from international nutrient recommendations for trans-fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, sodium, added sugar, fibre and energy, and evaluated against food composition data from 12 countries across Europe and market reality (actual foods on the market). Selected debates such as the source of fibre are also presented. RESULTS: Generic criteria and a decision framework were developed to further define food categories, so as to meet the unique country- and region-specific dietary needs. The result is a complete set of criteria that is evaluated on a regular basis to ensure its alignment with international dietary patterns, new scientific insights and current developments within the food market. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines are currently used in a number of countries across the globe, and are being evaluated for effectiveness. Completed studies have demonstrated an increase in consumer awareness, a positive effect on product innovation and a potential impact on nutrient intakes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ejcn.2011.101

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Food Standards Agency 2005 Effects of reducing salt in processed food on the population's salt intake—the salt modelAvailable at: http://www.food.gov.uk/healthiereating/salt/ saltmodel (last accessed October 2009).
  2. National Food and Nutrition Institute (IZZ) 2005 Polish Food Composition Data Base Tables of Nutritional Value of Food Products and Dishes3rd edition extended and updated. IZZ: Warsaw
  3. Wartella EAL Lichtenstein AH Boon CS 2010 Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase 1 ReportCommittee on Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Ratings Systems and Symbols; Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press: Washington, DC 24983042

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roodenburg, A. J. C., Popkin, B. M., & Seidell, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Seidell, J C
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2011-06-22
Volume
65
Issue
11
Pages
1190-1200
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2113575066
Cited by
124
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • FrieslandCampina
  • Choices International Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06)
  • Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen B.V.
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD-050924)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
front-of-pack labeling, discretionary foods, trans fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, sodium, added sugars, dietary fiber, energy intake, food reformulation, consumer awareness, product innovation
MeSH terms
Food Labeling, Health Promotion, Humans, International Cooperation, Netherlands, Patient Education as Topic, Guidelines as Topic, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review