Cited by 79Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingArt Therapy and Mental Health

Satisfaction with Daily Occupations: A Tool for Client Evaluation in Mental Health Care

Eklund, Mona·2004·Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/11038120410020700

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eklund, M.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Eklund, Mona
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2004-04
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
136-142
ISSN
  • 1103-8128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2014
OpenAlex
W1992711441
Cited by
79
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
psychometric properties, persistent mental illness, work values, quality of life, internal consistency, discriminant validity, daily occupations, client assessment, occupational therapy assessment, psychiatric outpatients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review