CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Predictors of perceived coercion in patients admitted for psychiatric hospitalization and the stability of these perceptions over time

Anestis, Angela, Daffern, Michael, Thomas, Stuart D.M., Podubinski, Tegan, Hollander, Yitzchak, Lee, Stuart, Foley, Fiona, de Castella, Anthony +1 more·2013·Psychiatry Psychology and Law
DOI 10.1080/13218719.2012.712833
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The origins of patients’ perceptions of coercion during short-term psychiatric hospitalization are varied. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the characteristics of patients that are associated with higher levels of perceived coercion and to determine whether these perceptions remain stable one year after admission. One hundred and twenty-five patients were recruited within three days of admission to the acute units at the Alfred Hospital Inpatient Psychiatry Department, Melbourne, Australia. In the initial recruitment phase, patients’ perceptions of coercion, psychiatric symptoms and interpersonal style were assessed using the Macarthur Admission Experience Scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-18 and the Impact Message Inventory–Circumplex. Admission status (voluntary versus involuntary) and demographic characteristics were also assessed. Follow-up assessments were conducted approximately one year later. Results suggest that a significant but small positive correlation existed between perceived coercion and a Hostile–Dominant interpersonal style at initial recruitment. Females reported significantly higher perceptions of coercion than males, but admission status and severity of psychiatric symptoms were unrelated to perceived coercion. Despite perceptions of coercion appearing to lessen over time, there is a need for specific interventions for these patients during their admission to hospital. There was a statistically significant decrease in perceived coercion over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13218719.2012.712833

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Anestis, A., Daffern, M., Thomas, S. D. M., Podubinski, T., Hollander, Y., Lee, S., Foley, F., de Castella, A., & Kulkarni, J.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Anestis, Angela
ORCID
Venue
Psychiatry Psychology and Law
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-08
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
492-503
ISSN
  • 1321-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-1687
DOI
10.1080/13218719.2012.712833
OpenAlex
W2066067249
Cited by
20
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Psychology and Law (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, psychiatric hospitalization, psychiatric inpatient care, interpersonal style, gender differences, psychiatric symptom severity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review