Cited by 16Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Perceived coercion in persons with mental disorder in India: A cross-sectional study

Open access
Raveesh, BN, Pathare, S, Lepping, P, Noorthoorn, EO, Gowda, GS, Bunders-Aelen, J G F·2016·Indian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how patients in India perceive coercion in psychiatric care. AIMS: To assess perceived coercion in persons with mental disorder admitted involuntarily and correlate with sociodemographic factors and illness variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered the short MacArthur Admission Experience Interview Questionnaire to all consecutive involuntary psychiatric patients admitted in 2014 in Mysore, India. Multivariate linear regression was used. RESULTS: Three hundred and one patients participated. "Perceived coercion" subscale scores increased with female gender, nuclear family status, Muslim and Christian religion, lower income, and depressive disorder. It decreased with former coercion, forensic history, and longer illness duration. Drug use increased total scores; the extended family item decreased them. "Negative pressure" increased with male gender, extended family, lower income, forensic history, and longer illness duration. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows perceived coercion is a reality in India. Levels of perceived coercion and the populations affected are similar to high-income countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/0019-5545.196846

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Beauchamp TL Childress J Principles of Biomedical Ethics 2001 1st, 5th ed New York Oxford University Press 1979
  2. [33]Röttgers HR Lepping P Sectioning and treatment of the psychiatrically ill in the UK and Germany Psychiatr Prax 1999 26 139 42 10412711

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raveesh, B., Pathare, S., Lepping, P., Noorthoorn, E., Gowda, G., & Bunders-Aelen, J. G. F.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Venue
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
210
ISSN
0019-5545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560876018
Cited by
16
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, involuntary psychiatric admission, involuntary psychiatric patients, psychiatric nursing, sociodemographic factors, depressive disorders, forensic history, disease duration, income, family structure, India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review