Cited by 17Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Investigating the role of psychopathic personality traits, gender and ethnicity in rape myth acceptance

Open access
Willmott, Dominic, Rafique, Aklima, Widanaralalage, B. Kennath, Agneswaran, Amuda·2025·Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Abstract

Research has found widespread endorsement of rape mythology, with several psychosocial variables underpinning beliefs in rape myths, including psychopathic personality traits. However, findings on the relationship between psychopathy and rape myths are often contradictory. The current study examined the role of four psychopathic personality traits (Affective Responsiveness, Cognitive Responsiveness, Interpersonal Manipulation and Egocentricity) on Rape Myth Acceptance (RMA) scores, controlling for the effects of gender and ethnicity while making use of subtle, contemporary measurement tools never previously employed. A cross-sectional community sample (N = 228) were recruited online to complete the psychosocial survey. Results revealed that deficits in Affective and Cognitive Responsiveness were associated with increased rape myth beliefs. Gender and ethnicity were also significant predictors of RMA. Cognitive Responsiveness, though not Affective Responsiveness, continued to be a significant predictor of RMA after controlling for gender and ethnicity. The role of empathy traits in the aetiology of sexually aggressive attitudes are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13218719.2024.2314000

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional gender values are well-documented as shaping victim-blaming attitudes and rape myths for both female and male survivors.

    “Traditional gender values are well-documented as shaping victim-blaming attitudes and rape myths for both female and male survivors [60, 61].”

    From ‘We don’t talk about that around here’: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of South Asian male survivors’ experiences of childhood sexual abuse in the UK (2025) · cites this paper as [61]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that adherence to traditional gender-role stereotypes explains variance in rape myth acceptance. The Introduction (page unavailable) describes myths that blame female survivors and deny that ‘real men’ can be raped. The paper does not establish that traditional gender values shape victim-blaming attitudes and rape myths for both female and male survivors. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Boduszek, D., Debowska, A., Dhingra, K., & DeLisi, M. (2016). Introduction and validation of Psychopathic Personality Trait Scale (PPTS) in a large prison sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 9– 17. 10.1016/j/jcrimjus.2016.02.004 · DOI
  2. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (International) (6th ed.). Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willmott, D., Rafique, A., Widanaralalage, B. K., & Agneswaran, A.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Willmott, Dominic
Venue
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
Published
2024-04-07
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
388-400
ISSN
  • 1321-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-1687
OpenAlex
W4395485159
Cited by
17
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Psychology and Law (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
rape myth acceptance, psychopathic traits, emotional responsiveness, interpersonal manipulation, self-centeredness, gender differences, ethnicity, sexual aggression, empathy, rape myths

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review