Cited by 37Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Male rape myths: Examining the role of victim empathy and socio-demographics in a cross-sectional sample of UK adults

Open access
Willmott, Dominic, Widanaralalage, B. Kennath·2024·International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice

Abstract

Whilst much is known about the psychosocial correlates of rape myth beliefs regarding female victims, much less research has investigated factors that underlie male rape myth beliefs. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the role of victim empathy and socio-demographics upon male rape myth beliefs. 303 UK adults aged 18 to 74 (M Age = 31.48) completed the Male Rape Myth Scale (MRMS) and the None-in-Three Victim Responsiveness Assessment (NI3: VRA), alongside assessing socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, education). Results reveal gender and ethnicity differences in affective victim-empathy sub-scales and overall male rape myth beliefs. Regression analyses determined that age, gender, ethnicity, and affective victim-empathy were significant predictors of male rape myth attitudes. The results have important implications for understanding those who are likely to believe falsehoods pertaining to male survivors of sexual victimisation and highlight the need for targeted educational intervention programmes among the UK public, including in their role as jurors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2023.100645

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [Ioannides, A., Willmott, D., 2023. Do psychopathic traits, sexual victimisation experiences and emotional intelligence predict attitudes towards rape? Examining the Psychosocial Correlates of Rape Myth Beliefs Among a Cross-Sectional Community Sample Polish Psychological Bulletin [Ahead of print].](http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1756-0616(23)00071-X/sref34)
  2. Leverick, F., 2020. What do we know about rape myths and juror decision making?. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof , 24 (3), 255 -279. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1756-0616(2300071-X/sref43)
  3. Lieberman, J.D., Krauss, D.A., 2016. J ury Psychology: Social Aspects of Trial Processes , ume I. Ashgate, Surrey. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1756-0616(2300071-X/sref44)
  4. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., Ullman, J.B., 2013. Using Multivariate Statistics, vol. 6. pearson, Boston, MA, pp. 497 -516. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1756-0616(2300071-X/sref68)
  5. Willmott, D., Hudspith, L., 2023. Jury trials and rape myth bias: examining the research evidence, stakeholder perspectives and effective solutions. In: Monaghan, N. (Ed.), Challenges in the Jury System: UK Juries in Comparative Perspective. Routledge, London. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S1756-0616(2300071-X/sref82)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willmott, D., & Widanaralalage, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Willmott, Dominic
Venue
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
76
Pages
100645
ISSN
  • 0194-6595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-0616
OpenAlex
W4389512194
Cited by
37
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-12-01)
Open access
Locations
  • International journal of law, crime and justice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
victim empathy, affective empathy, sociodemographic factors, gender differences, ethnicity, age differences, juror education, public attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review