Cited by 36Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesCriminal Justice and PenologyIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Lessons from London: a contemporary examination of the factors affecting attrition among rape complaints

Open access
Murphy, Anthony, Hine, Ben, Yesberg, Julia A., Wunsch, Daniela, Charleton, Barry·2022·Psychology, Crime & Law

Abstract

Severe levels of attrition in rape cases within the criminal justice system are widely recognised. Previous reviews (e.g. Hohl & Stanko, 2015 Hohl, K., & Stanko, E. A. (2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815571949[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 324–341) have provided information on the general profile of cases, their outcomes, and the relationship between the two, in attempts to understand these patterns. However, recent changes to the landscape of rape investigation (e.g. the impact of technology) justify a more contemporary assessment. The present study coded 446 cases of rape reported in London in April 2016, on a variety of victim, suspect, offence, and procedural characteristics, as well as case outcomes. We conducted descriptive analyses of case profiles and inferential examinations of the relationship between case characteristics and outcomes. Findings suggest the profile of victims, suspects, and the context of offences has remained mostly similar, with some noticeable changes (e.g. a larger array of victim vulnerabilities). Moreover, several existing, exacerbated, as well as novel procedural challenges present (e.g. delay due to workload, third party materials). Additionally, many rape-myth related case factors no longer predict case outcomes and officers instead may now engage in greater ‘downstream’ orientation, and anticipation of case uptake, when evaluating cases. Recommendations for policy and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1068316x.2021.1880584

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, A., Hine, B., Yesberg, J. A., Wunsch, D., & Charleton, B.
Affiliations
  • University of West London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Evidence & Insight, London Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime
  • Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (GB)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Anthony
Venue
Psychology, Crime & Law
Published
2021-02-03
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
82-114
ISSN
  • 1068-316X (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2744
OpenAlex
W3126683412
Cited by
36
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology Crime and Law (publishedVersion)
  • UWL Repository (University of West London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Victoria University of Wellington
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
case attrition, rape investigation, criminal justice system, case outcomes, victim characteristics, suspect characteristics, rape myths, London

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review