Cited by 1,529Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath

Blair, R·1995·Cognition

Abstract

Various social animal species have been noted to inhibit aggressive attacks when a conspecific displays submission cues. Blair (1993) has suggested that humans possess a functionally similar mechanism which mediates the suppression of aggression in the context of distress cues. He has suggested that this mechanism is a prerequisite for the development of the moral/conventional distinction; the consistently observed distinction in subject's judgments between moral and conventional transgressions. Psychopaths may lack this violence inhibitor. A causal model is developed showing how the lack of this mechanism would explain the core behavioural symptoms associated with the psychopathic disorder. A prediction of such a causal model would be that psychopaths should fail to make the moral/conventional distinction. This prediction was confirmed. The implication of this finding for other theories of morality is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00676-p

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blair, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Blair, R
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-10
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068477427
Cited by
1,529
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 66
FWCI
29.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Experimental Psychology Society
  • University College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
psychopathy, moral judgment, aggression inhibition
MeSH terms
Adult, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Morals, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review