CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 147Visual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision

Noe, Alva, Pessoa, Luiz, Thompson, Evan·2000·Visual Cognition
DOI 10.1080/135062800394702
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Experiments on scene perception and change blindness suggest that the visual system does not construct detailed internal models of a scene. These experiments therefore call into doubt the traditional view that vision is a process in which detailed representations of the environment must be constructed. The non-existence of such detailed representations, however, does not entail that we do not perceive the detailed environment. The “grand illusion hypothesis” that our visual world is an illusion rests on (1) a problematic “reconstructionist” conception of vision, and (2) a misconception about the character of perceptual experience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/135062800394702

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ballard D. H., 1996, Perception, 111
  2. Currie C., 1995, Maintaining visual stability across saccades: Role of the saccade target object
  3. Grimes J., 1996, Perception, 89
  4. Marr D., 1982, Vision
  5. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.329 · DOI
  6. Noë A., Canadian Journal of Philosophy
  7. O'Regan J. K., 1996, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual. Science, 37, S213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 147

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Noe, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E.
ORCID
Venue
Visual Cognition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-01
Volume
7
Issue
1-3
Pages
93-106
ISSN
  • 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0716
DOI
10.1080/135062800394702
OpenAlex
W2117633840
Cited by
147
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Visual Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
change blindness, scene perception, visual representation, reconstructionism, perceptual experience, visual system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review