Cited by 167Visual perception and processing mechanismsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming

Open access
Theeuwes, Jan, Reimann, Brit, Mortier, Karen·2006·Visual Cognition

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of top-down knowledge on search for a feature singleton (a “pop-out target”). In a singleton detection task, advance cueing of the dimension of upcoming singleton resulted in cueing costs and benefits (Experiment 1). When the search for the singleton stayed the same but only the response requirements were changed, advance cueing failed to have an effect (Experiments 2 and 3). In singleton search only bottom-up priming plays a role (Experiments 4 and 5). We conclude that expectancy-based, top-down knowledge cannot guide the search for a featural singleton. Bottom-up priming that does facilitate search for a featural singleton cannot be influenced by top-down control. The study demonstrates that effects often attributed to early top-down guidance may represent effects that occur later in processing or represent bottom-up priming effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13506280500195110

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even a strong top-down set to select only the task-relevant stimulus cannot overcome the capturing effects of a salient stimulus, a primed stimulus, or a stimulus associated with reward.

    “several studies have already shown that even a strong top-down set to select only the task-relevant stimulus cannot overcome the capturing effects of a salient stimulus (Theeuwes, 1991b, 1992, 1994), a stimulus that is primed (Theeuwes, Reimann, & Mortier, 2006; Theeuwes & van der Burg, 2011), or a stimulus associated with reward (Anderson et al., 2011).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Theeuwes, Reimann, & Mortier, 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Bottom-up capture and attentional set: Selective search for colour and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor- mance, 20 , 799 Á806.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theeuwes, J., Reimann, B., & Mortier, K.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Theeuwes, Jan
Venue
Visual Cognition
Published
2006-08
Volume
14
Issue
4-8
Pages
466-489
ISSN
  • 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0716
OpenAlex
W2068764146
Cited by
166
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Visual Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
visual search, pop-out, top-down control, singleton detection, response requirement, expectancy, top-down modulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review