Cited by 9Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Why WAIT? Preliminary evaluation of the weight assistance and intervention techniques (WAIT) group

Miller-Matero, Lisa R., Brescacin, Carly, Clark, Shannon M., Troncone, Catherine L., Tobin, Erin T.·2019·Psychology, Health & Medicine

Abstract

Individuals who attempt to lose weight may struggle because they lack skills to address problematic eating behaviors. There are multiple programs that have taught patients some of these behavioral strategies; however, it is not clear which strategies patients find to be the most useful. The purpose of this study was to examine preliminary outcomes after completion of a six-week integrative group for weight management. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted of 51 patients who completed an integrative, psychological weight management group. Patients were mailed surveys 1-2 years after completion of the group assessing for current problematic eating behaviors (i.e. emotional eating and food addiction), satisfaction with treatment, and skills they continue to use. The majority of patients lost weight, were satisfied with the group, found the group to be helpful, and felt confident they could maintain behavior changes. The strategies patients most commonly continued to use post-group included mindful eating, keeping a food diary, carrying out an exercise plan, regular weigh-ins, and planning for social eating. The number of food addiction symptoms decreased from pre- to post-group. An integrative psychological weight management group may provide patients with skills and confidence to assist with managing problematic eating behaviors and weight loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13548506.2019.1587478

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller-Matero, L. R., Brescacin, C., Clark, S. M., Troncone, C. L., & Tobin, E. T.
Affiliations
Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
Miller-Matero, Lisa R.
Venue
Psychology, Health & Medicine
Published
2019-03-07
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1029-1037
ISSN
  • 1354-8506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3966
OpenAlex
W2921055511
Cited by
9
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Health & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
funding
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
weight management, weight loss, problematic eating behaviors, emotional eating, food addiction, group intervention, behavioral skills training, mindful eating, food diary, physical activity, treatment satisfaction, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Retrospective Studies, Behavior, Addictive, Patient Satisfaction, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review