Cited by 707Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Neural correlates of food addiction

Open access
Gearhardt, Ashley N.·2011·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Research has implicated an addictive process in the development and maintenance of obesity. Although parallels in neural functioning between obesity and substance dependence have been found, to our knowledge, no studies have examined the neural correlates of addictive-like eating behavior. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that elevated "food addiction" scores are associated with similar patterns of neural activation as substance dependence. DESIGN: Between-subjects functional magnetic resonance imaging study. SETTING: A university neuroimaging center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight healthy young women ranging from lean to obese recruited for a healthy weight maintenance trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The relation between elevated food addiction scores and blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging activation in response to receipt and anticipated receipt of palatable food (chocolate milkshake). RESULTS: Food addiction scores (N = 39) correlated with greater activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala in response to anticipated receipt of food (P < .05, false discovery rate corrected for multiple comparisons in small volumes). Participants with higher (n = 15) vs lower (n = 11) food addiction scores showed greater activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the caudate in response to anticipated receipt of food but less activation in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex in response to receipt of food (false discovery rate-corrected P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Similar patterns of neural activation are implicated in addictive-like eating behavior and substance dependence: elevated activation in reward circuitry in response to food cues and reduced activation of inhibitory regions in response to food intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.32

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media and food cues activate the same brain regions, such as the orbitofrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, amygdala, anterior cingulate, striatum, and medial frontal cortex.

    “Social media and food cues have been shown to activate the same brain regions, such as the orbitofrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, the amygdala, anterior cingulate, striatum, and medial frontal cortex (Dagher, 2009; Gearhardt et al., 2011).”

    From Common Predictive Factors of Social Media Addiction and Eating Disorder Symptoms in Female College Students: State Anxiety and the Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility/Sustained Attention (2022) · cites this paper as Gearhardt et al., 2011

    The Abstract’s Results report activation of the anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala in response to anticipated food receipt; the Discussion also discusses food-cue responses. The supplied passages give no finding about social media cues, so they do not establish that social media and food cues activate the same regions. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies using BOLD fMRI have shown selective overactivity in the nucleus accumbens and related brain areas in subjects who scored high on a measure of food addiction.

    “and in subjects who scored high on a measure of food addiction (39).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [48]Petrides M Frontal lobes and working memory: evidence from investigations of the effects of cortical excisions in nonhuman primates Boller F Grafman J Handbook of Neuropsychology 1994 Elsevier Amsterdam 59 82

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gearhardt, A. N.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Gearhardt, Ashley N.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
808
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114683421
Cited by
707
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 48
FWCI
59.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R1MH64560A, R01MH064560)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK080760)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
food addiction, obesity, substance dependence, neural correlates, reward systems, anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, young women
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Obesity, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Body Mass Index, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review