Cited by 109Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health Practices

An acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss: a pilot study

Open access
Niemeier, Heather M., Leahey, Tricia, Palm Reed, Kathleen, Brown, Richard A., Wing, Rena R.·2012·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

On average, participants in behavioral weight-loss interventions lose 8 kilograms (kg) at 6 months, but there is marked variability in outcomes with some participants losing little or no weight. Individuals with difficulties with internal disinhibition (i.e., eating in response to emotions or thoughts) typically lose less weight in such programs and may require an innovative, specialized approach. This pilot study examined the preliminary acceptability and efficacy of a 24-week acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss among overweight and obese adults reporting difficulty with eating in response to emotions and thoughts. Participants were 21 overweight or obese men and women (mean age=52.2±7.6 years; baseline mean body mass index=32.8±3.4). Eighty-six percent completed the 6-month program and a 3-month follow-up assessment. Ratings of program satisfaction averaged 4.9 on a five-point scale. Multilevel modeling analyses indicated participants lost an average of 12.0 kg (SE=1.4) after 6 months of treatment and 12.1 kg (SE=1.9) at 3-month follow-up, thus exceeding the weight losses typically seen in behavioral treatment programs. Decreases in internal disinhibition and weight-related experiential avoidance were found at 6- and 3-months follow-up. Greater decreases in weight-related experiential avoidance were associated with greater weight loss at the end of the program (r=.64, p=.002), suggesting a potential mechanism of action. Although there have been a few preliminary studies using acceptance-based approaches for obesity, this is the first study to specifically target emotional overeaters, a subgroup that might be particularly responsive to this new approach. Our findings provide initial support for the feasibility, efficacy, and acceptability of this approach for this subgroup of participants. Further study with longer follow-up, a more diverse sample, and comparison to a standard behavioral program is clearly warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2011.10.005

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niemeier, H. M., Leahey, T., Palm Reed, K., Brown, R. A., & Wing, R. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Whitewater (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Niemeier, Heather M.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
427-435
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137705110
Cited by
109
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Clark Digital Commons (Clark University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5K23-DK73536, K23DK073536)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
weight loss, obesity, emotional overeating, experiential avoidance, overweight adults, treatment acceptability, dietary habits
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Diet, Reducing, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pilot Projects, Weight Loss, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review