The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An experience-sampling measure of job satisfaction and its relationships with affectivity, mood at work, job beliefs, and general job satisfaction
Abstract
In this article, we proposed an experience-sampling method of measuring job satisfaction, assessed the contributions of average levels of mood at work and job beliefs to the prediction of job satisfaction, and examined the role of mood in mediating the relationship between affectivity and job satisfaction. The study involved a three-phase multisource longitudinal design that included experience-sampling surveys in the second phase of the study. Results suggested that average levels of experience-sampled job satisfaction indicate the general attitudinal construct of job satisfaction. As expected, pleasant mood at work and beliefs about the job made independent contributions to the prediction of job satisfaction (as measured with an overall evaluation and with an experience-sampling measure). In support of our mediation hypotheses, pleasant mood mediated the affectivity – job satisfaction relationship and the mediating effect was much stronger when job satisfaction was assessed with the experience-sampling method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
Blaney, P. H. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.99.2.229 · Cited by 1,773
Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66 · Cited by 1,545 · cited 2×
“In terms of work performance, Rotundo and Sackett (2002) provide evidence of three major domains of job performance—task, citizenship, and counterproductive behaviour.”
BackgroundSERVICE WITH A SMILE: EMOTIONAL CONTAGION IN THE SERVICE ENCOUNTER.
Pugh, S. D. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069445 · Cited by 1,393
Cited by
MOUNT, M., ILIES, R., & JOHNSON, E. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x · Cited by 699
Self-citationIlies, R., Schwind, K. M., Wagner, D. T., Johnson, M. D., DeRue, D. S., & Ilgen, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368 · Cited by 509
Self-citationC.H. Chan, S., & Mak, W.-M. (2014) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-08-2011-0125 · Cited by 209
Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here?
Ilies, R., Aw, S. S. Y., & Pluut, H. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2015.1071422 · Cited by 167
Self-citationDo lean manufacturing practices have negative impact on job satisfaction?
Minh, K. S., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Heidari, S. (2019) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/ijlss-11-2016-0072 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-389
- ISSN
- 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0643
- OpenAlex
- W2096555826
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experience-sampling measure of job satisfaction and its relationships with affectivity, mood at work, job beliefs, and general job satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13594320444000137
- The paper
- Ilies, R., & Judge, T. A. (2004). An experience-sampling measure of job satisfaction and its relationships with affectivity, mood at work, job beliefs, and general job satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
