The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experiencing more mathematics anxiety than expected? Contrasting trait and state anxiety in high achieving students
Open accessAbstract
This study examined mathematics anxiety among high and low achieving students (N = 237, grades 9 and 10) by contrasting trait (habitual) and state (momentary) assessments of anxiety. Previous studies have found that trait anxiety measures are typically rated higher than state measures. Furthermore, the academic self-concept has been identified to play a moderating role in the trait-state discrepancy, with higher academic self-concept leading to a lower discrepancy (i.e. less overestimation of trait anxiety if state assessments reflect actual experience). Therefore, we assumed that high achievers who were expected to have high academic self-concepts would exhibit a smaller trait-state discrepancy than low achievers. Results confirmed these assumptions and revealed that high achievers even underestimated their trait anxiety. Implications are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pekrun, R. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9 · Cited by 5,566 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, high achievers can be assumed to have higher subjective control appraisals in classroom situations than low achievers, which as assumed by the control-value theory (Pekrun, 2006) should result in high achievers also experiencing less state anxiety than low achievers.”
BackgroundPekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3702_4 · Cited by 3,931
Self-citationBelief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
The Relation Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3 · Cited by 1,315
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1002/1097-679(197104)27:2<188:AID-JCLP2270270208>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0092563 · DOI
- 10.1177/01461672012711009 · DOI
- Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences
- Federal Statistical Office [Statistisches Bundesamt], 2015, Schnellmeldungsergebnisse zu Schülerinnen und Schülern der allgemeinbildenden und beruflichen Schulen-Schuljahr 2014/15
- Goetz T., 2004, Emotionales Erleben und selbstreguliertes Lernen bei Schülern im Fach Mathematik [Emotions and self-regulated learning of students in mathematics]
- 10.1177/0956797613486989 · DOI
- Goetz T., 2013, International guide to student achievement, 192
- 10.2307/749455 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10384 · DOI
- Kunter M., 2002, PISA 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2000: Documentation of scales]
- 10.2307/749772 · DOI
- Marsh H. W., 1990, Self-description questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and a research monograph
- Marsh H. W., 1997, Educational psychology series. Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment, 131
- 10.3102/0034654309337522 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0027697 · DOI
- Pekrun R., 2006, Academic Emotions Questionnaire – Mathematics (AEQ-M) – User’s manual
- 10.1080/00273170701341316 · DOI · Paper page
- Raudenbush S. W., 2002, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
- Spielberger C., 1970, Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory
- 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.21 · DOI
- Wilhelm P., 2011, Handbook of research methods for studying daily life, 62
- 10.1111/1467-9280.03455 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Botes, E., Dewaele, J.-M., & Greiff, S. (2020) · Journal for the Psychology of Language Learning · doi:10.52598/jpll/2/1/3 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Roos, A.-L., Bieg, M., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Taxer, J., & Zeidner, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Konstanz (DE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Roos, A.-L.
- Venue
- High Ability Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-07-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-258
- ISSN
- 1359-8139 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-834X
- OpenAlex
- W2166902996
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nbn-resolving.de
- Locations
- High Ability Studies (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Keywords
- mathematics anxiety, trait anxiety, state anxiety, academic self-concept, high-achieving students, self-perceived anxiety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
