Cited by 63Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Dementia Caregivers’ Coping Strategies and Their Relationship to Health and Well-Being: The Cache County Study

Open access
Snyder, Christine M., Fauth, Elizabeth, Wanzek, Joseph, Piercy, Kathleen W., Norton, Maria C., Corcoran, Chris, Rabins, Peter V., Lyketsos, Constantine G. +1 more·2015·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prior research identifies that psychological outcomes among dementia caregivers are associated with their use of coping strategies. Few studies have tested the association of coping and health longitudinally. METHOD: This study examined factors associated with the use of coping strategies over time and their associations with physical and mental health outcomes in a population-based sample of 226 dementia caregivers in Cache County, Utah, USA. Caregivers annually completed the Ways of Coping Checklist-Revised, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and a health interview. Care-recipient cognitive and functional abilities were obtained using the Mini-Mental State Exam and the Clinical Dementia Rating. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. RESULTS: Caregivers most frequently identified providing care as a problem (37.6%). Linear mixed models of caregiver coping strategies found that the use of most strategies were stable except for increasing Avoidance among adult child caregivers (β = 0.14, p = 0.048). On average, increased Wishful Thinking (β = 2.48, p < 0.001) or Blames Self (β = 1.06, p = 0.002) was associated with higher anxiety scores. Increased use of Blames Others among males (interaction, β = 0.28, p = 0.02) and greater use of Wishful Thinking among younger caregivers (interaction, β = -0.01, p = 0.01) were associated with more caregiver health conditions. Coping strategies were not associated with change in anxiety or health conditions over time. CONCLUSION: Our results emphasize the importance of caregiver coping strategies on caregiver health and well-being and may identify subgroups of persons at risk for worse outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2014.939610

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wishful thinking and self-blame are associated with caregiver anxiety and male caregiver health problems.

    “an association of wishful thinking and self-blame with caregiver anxiety and male caregiver health problems was found [14].”

    From Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Caregivers of Frail Older Chinese Adults: A Study Protocol (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results section on anxiety reports that Wishful Thinking and Blames Self were both associated with greater caregiver anxiety. The Results section on health conditions instead links male caregivers’ greater number of health conditions to Blames Others, not self-blame. Thus the anxiety finding is supported, but the male-health portion misidentifies the coping strategy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snyder, C. M., Fauth, E., Wanzek, J., Piercy, K. W., Norton, M. C., Corcoran, C., Rabins, P. V., Lyketsos, C. G., & Tschanz, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Tschanz, JoAnn T.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2014-08-05
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
390-399
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2015677371
Cited by
63
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG011380, R01AG021136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
dementia caregivers, coping strategies, caregiver health, caregiver well-being, anxiety, wishful thinking, blaming others, avoidance, neuropsychiatric symptoms, adult child caregivers, gender differences, age differences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Anxiety, Dementia, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Neuropsychological Tests, Parent-Child Relations, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review