Cited by 10Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingNursing care and research

Personal values profiles in dementia family caregivers: their association with ambivalent feelings and anxious and depressive symptoms

Vara-García, Carlos, Romero-Moreno, Rosa, Barrera-Caballero, Samara, Pedroso-Chaparro, María del Sequeros, Cabrera, Isabel, Márquez-González, María, Olazarán, Javier, Losada, Andrés·2021·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Culture-related variables, such as personal values, have been suggested as important in stress processes, such as family caregiving of people with dementia. Personal values may be categorized into two dimensions: family and own personal values. Drawing upon the Sociocultural Stress and Coping model, the objective of this study is to analyze differences between caregivers depending on their values profiles. METHOD: Participants were 333 family caregivers of a spouse or a parent with dementia. Caregivers chose their two most important values, apart from caregiving, from a list of eight family-related and non-family-related values (own values). Therefore, three values profiles were possible: Family-values profile (FVP: the two values are family related), Mixed-values profile (MVP: one family related value and one own value), and Own-values profile (OVP: two own values were selected). In addition to values, sociodemographic variables, commitment and satisfaction with caregiving value and with chosen values, ambivalent feelings, and anxiety and depression symptomatology were assessed. ANOVA analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The analyses suggest that caregivers in the FVP had lower levels of anxiety and ambivalent feelings and a higher commitment to and satisfaction with their chosen values than the other profiles. No differences were found for commitment and satisfaction with the caregiving value. CONCLUSION: Caregivers' value profiles seem to play an important role in the effects of stress over psychological health. Possible explanations of these effects about potential role conflicts and a higher commitment to values are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2020.1821169

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vara-García, C., Romero-Moreno, R., Barrera-Caballero, S., Pedroso-Chaparro, M. D. S., Cabrera, I., Márquez-González, M., Olazarán, J., & Losada, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
  • Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2020-09-21
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
2160-2168
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W3087734219
Cited by
10
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
personal values, family caregivers, dementia caregiving, anxiety, depression, value profiles, family values, caregiver stress, role conflict, caregiver commitment, caregiver satisfaction
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Emotions, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review