Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 695

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

And we are still not saved: critical race theory in education ten years later

Dixson, Adrienne D., Rousseau, Celia K.·2005·Race Ethnicity and Education
DOI 10.1080/1361332052000340971
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In 1995, Teachers College Record published an article by Gloria Ladson‐Billings and William Tate entitled ‘Toward a critical race theory of education’. In this article, the authors proposed that critical race theory (CRT), a framework developed by legal scholars, could be employed to examine the role of race and racism in education. Within a few years of the publication of the article by Ladson‐Billings and Tate, several scholars in education had begun to describe their work as reflecting a CRT framework. In this article, we review the literature on CRT in education that has been published over the past ten years. We also assess how far we have come with respect to CRT in education and suggest where we might go from here.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1361332052000340971

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Crenshaw K, 1989, National Black Law Journal, 11, 1
  2. Crenshaw K, 1995, Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement
  3. Duncan G, 2002, Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 85, 10.1177/107780040200800106 · doi:10.1177/107780040200800106
  4. Fernandez L, 2002, Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 45, 10.1177/107780040200800104 · doi:10.1177/107780040200800104 · Paper page
  5. Fine M, 1991, Framing dropouts: notes on the politics of an urban high school
  6. Ladson‐Billings G, 1999, Review of research in education, 24, 221
  7. Lawrence C, 1995, Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement, 336
  8. Matsuda M, 1995, Critical race theory: the key writings that formed the movement, 63
  9. Matsuda M, 1993, Words that wound: critical race theory, assualtive speech and the first amendment
  10. McKenzie K, 2004, The Commercial Appeal, A1, A19
  11. Oakes J, 2000, Coursetaking and achievement in mathematics and science: Inequalities that endure and change
  12. Orfield G, 2004, q?
  13. Parker L, 2002, Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 7
  14. Pursley G, 2003, Texas Law Review, 82, 153
  15. Tate W, 1999, Race is … race isn’t: critical race theory and qualitative studies in education, 251
  16. 10.1177/0895904893007003002 · doi:10.1177/0895904893007003002
  17. Taylor E, 1999, Race is … race isn’t: critical race theory and qualitative studies in education, 181
  18. 10.1080/713845281 · doi:10.1080/713845281
  19. Vavrus M, 2002, Transforming the multicultural education of teachers: theory, research and practice
  20. Villalpando O, 2002, The racial crisis in American higher education, 243

Cited by

See all 695

Metadata

Authors
Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K.
Venue
Race Ethnicity and Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2005-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
7-27
ISSN
  • 1361-3324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-109X
DOI
10.1080/1361332052000340971
OpenAlex
W1964302339
Cited by
695
References
41
FWCI
49.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: And we are still not saved: critical race theory in education ten years later. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1361332052000340971
The paper
Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K. (2005). And we are still not saved: critical race theory in education ten years later. Race Ethnicity and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361332052000340971

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.