Feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary effectiveness of an accelerated bilateral intermittent theta-burst stimulation protocol in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depressive disorder following mild traumatic brain injury
Open accessAbstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorder, and persistent post-concussive symptoms commonly co-occur after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Evidence is limited for accelerated bilateral intermittent theta-burst stimulation (AB-iTBS) in outpatient care for this triad. Single-site retrospective cohort of 64 AB-iTBS courses in 55 adults (aged 18–69; 52.7% female) with PTSD, depressive disorder, and predominantly mild TBI (2023–2026). The protocol delivered 20 sessions/day for 4 days (80/course), alternating left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 120% resting motor threshold (600-pulse theta-burst). Outcomes were feasibility, tolerability, and within-patient change in PHQ-9, PCL-5, GAD-7, and PSS at Post-treatment and Follow-up. 55/64 courses (85.9%; 95% CI, 75.0–93.4) completed; no treatment-emergent adverse events (0/64; 95% CI, 0.0–5.6). Baseline-to-Follow-up reductions were significant for PHQ-9 (dz = −0.60; p = .004), PCL-5 (dz = −0.54; p = .008), GAD-7 (dz = −0.77; p < .001), and PSS (dz = −0.67; p = .002). At Follow-up, response was 35.7% (PHQ-9), 50.0% (PCL-5), and 44.4% (GAD-7); remission was 35.0%, 33.3%, and 44.4%. Overall improvement increased from Post-treatment to Follow-up; 20.0%–28.6% first met criterion at Follow-up. AB-iTBS protocol was feasible, tolerated without documented adverse events, and associated with short-term improvement across depressive, posttraumatic, anxiety, and perceived-stress domains.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a single-site retrospective cohort of 64 accelerated bilateral iTBS courses in adults with PTSD, depressive disorder, and predominantly mild TBI, the 4-day protocol was feasible and no treatment-emergent adverse events were documented. Paired within-patient analyses showed medium-to-large symptom reductions in depression, PTSD, anxiety, and perceived stress through short-term follow-up.
Key findings
- Feasibility: 55/64 courses (85.9%; exact 95% CI 75.0–93.4) received at least the targeted 80 sessions; 54/64 (84.4%) completed exactly 80 sessions; all 64 courses adhered to 20 sessions/day; mean total sessions delivered was 73.6 (SD 17.5), and median course duration was 3 days (IQR 3–3). Shortened courses were documented as early termination for logistical reasons rather than intolerance or adverse events.
- Tolerability: 0/64 courses (0.0%; exact 95% CI 0.0–5.6) had documented treatment-emergent adverse events; no reviewed record documented seizure, syncope, persistent headache requiring medical evaluation, or site-specific adverse effects.
- Symptom change: PHQ-9 decreased from baseline mean 12.9 to 9.8 at post-treatment (mean change −3.13; dz = −0.55; p = .001; n = 39) and to 10.4 at follow-up (−3.39; dz = −0.60; p = .004; n = 28). PCL-5 total decreased from 39.9 to 32.6 post-treatment (−7.34; dz = −0.50; p = .004; n = 38) and to 35.0 at follow-up (−8.61; dz = −0.54; p = .008; n = 28). GAD-7 decreased from 11.3 to 9.7 post-treatment (−1.62; dz = −0.42; p = .020; n = 34) and to 9.3 at follow-up (−3.63; dz = −0.77; p < .001; n = 27). PSS decreased from 24.4 to 23.1 post-treatment (−1.32; dz = −0.31; p = .08; n = 34) and to 22.3 at follow-up (−2.67; dz = −0.67; p = .002; n = 27).
- Clinical improvement: at follow-up, overall clinical improvement (union of response and remission) was 42.9% for PHQ-9, 50.0% for PCL-5 total, and 44.4% for GAD-7, exceeding post-treatment rates of 30.8%, 31.6%, and 32.4%, respectively; delayed response was observed in 28.6% of paired PHQ-9 courses, 20.0% of PCL-5 total courses, and 20.0% of GAD-7 courses.
Methods
- Single-site retrospective cohort using routinely collected clinical records from an outpatient TMS practice; all consecutive courses labeled under a PTSD + Depression clinical pathway were included. Inclusion required established clinical diagnoses of PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI recorded before TMS initiation; diagnoses were clinical rather than structured research interviews. The cohort comprised 64 courses delivered to 55 unique adults.
- Treatment protocol: MagVenture TMS system; targeted course of 20 iTBS sessions per day for 4 consecutive days (80 total), alternating 10 left and 10 right DLPFC sessions daily, with approximately 15–20 min between consecutive sessions. Both sides used identical iTBS parameters at 120% of resting motor threshold; each session delivered 600 pulses (bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz, 2-second trains every 10 s for 20 trains), approximately 3 min 9 s.
- Outcomes and analysis: primary outcomes were feasibility (proportion reaching ≥80 sessions and adherence to 20 sessions/day) and tolerability (documented treatment-emergent adverse events). Secondary outcomes were PHQ-9 and PCL-5 total/clusters; tertiary outcomes were PSS and GAD-7. Paired t tests were used for within-patient change, with Wilcoxon signed-rank sensitivity analyses; Cohen dz and exact Clopper-Pearson 95% CIs were reported. Response, remission, and overall clinical improvement were prespecified; no formal correction for multiple comparisons was applied.
Limitations
- The paper states: the design was retrospective and uncontrolled, precluding causal inference; tolerability was ascertained from clinical documentation rather than a structured patient-reported adverse-event instrument, which may underestimate low-grade side effects; follow-up assessments were available for only 28/64 courses (43.8%), creating potential follow-up bias; the cohort was predominantly mild TBI after motor vehicle collision at a single site, limiting generalisability; diagnoses were clinical rather than structured research interviews; the analytic unit was the treatment course, with nine patients contributing multiple courses and intra-patient correlation not explicitly modeled; the follow-up window (median 39 days) is insufficient to adjudicate durability; and the sample size is modest, so comparative efficacy versus alternative TMS protocols cannot be adjudicated.
- The paper also states that courses lacking an immediate post-treatment assessment had higher baseline severity on PHQ-9 (17.2 vs 12.9; p = .011), PCL-5 total (50.5 vs 39.9; p = .025), and GAD-7 (15.3 vs 11.7; p = .017), so post-treatment estimates may modestly understate early change in the most affected courses.
- Evident from the text: there was no sham or comparator arm; outcome data availability was incomplete (post-treatment questionnaires for 39/64, follow-up for 28/64); categorical outcomes were not computed for PSS because validated dichotomous cut-offs are not established; and no formal correction for multiple comparisons was applied, so exploratory findings should be interpreted accordingly.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
32 of 62 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
PTSD, depressive disorder, and persistent post-concussive symptoms frequently co-occur after mild traumatic brain injury.
“Posttraumatic stress disorder (PtsD), depressive disorder, and persistent post-concussive symptoms frequently co-occur after mild traumatic brain injury (tBi)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Bahraini et al. 2014 source
- cites Bombardier et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mcinnes et al. 2017 source
The Introduction (page unavailable in our copy) lists depression among post-concussion symptoms and says some people experience persistent post-concussion syndrome after mild TBI. It does not establish that PTSD, depressive disorder, and persistent symptoms frequently co-occur, or equate the listed symptom of depression with a depressive disorder. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Each of PTSD, depressive disorder, and persistent post-concussive symptoms amplifies the functional impact of the others after mild TBI.
“with each condition amplifying the functional impact of the others”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Bahraini et al. 2014 source
- cites Bombardier et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Mcinnes et al. 2017 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) lists depression among post-concussion symptoms and describes persistent PCS, but it does not say that PTSD, depressive disorder, and persistent PCS amplify one another’s functional impact. Searches for PTSD, depression, functional impact, and interactions among these conditions found no passage addressing that relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In military and veteran populations, benefit has been reported in individuals with co-occurring PTSD, depression, and mild TBI.
“in military and veteran populations, benefit has been reported in individuals with co-occurring PtsD, depression, and mild tBi”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Madore et al. 2022 source
The Discussion reports clinically meaningful benefit from TMS in veterans with co-occurring PTSD and depression, and the Results report improvements in both symptom domains. The paper does not report outcomes for patients who also had mild TBI, so it does not support that part of the claim (searched: TBI, traumatic brain injury, concussion). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Oberman et al. 2020 source
- cites Philip et al. 2023 source
- Premisecitation
Bilateral rTMS has shown efficacy and acceptability at least comparable to unilateral stimulation for depression.
“bilateral rtMs has shown efficacy and acceptability at least comparable to unilateral stimulation for depression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Major depression is characterised by relative hypoactivity of the left and hyperactivity of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
“major depression is characterised by relative hypoactivity of the left and hyperactivity of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DlPFc)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Berlim et al. 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Chen et al. 2014 source
- cites Mutz et al. 2019 source
The Introduction’s transcranial magnetic stimulation section (page unavailable) describes excitatory high-frequency stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inhibitory low-frequency stimulation of the right as treatment protocols. It does not state that major depression is characterised by left-sided hypoactivity and right-sided hyperactivity; searches for that activity pattern found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
TBI status has not been shown to eliminate symptomatic response to TMS.
“and tBi status has not been shown to eliminate symptomatic response”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Madore et al. 2022 source
The Results > Clinical Outcomes section reports symptomatic improvement after TMS and compares veterans with and without PTSD, not TBI. Searches for “TBI” and “traumatic brain injury” found no passage assessing whether TBI status affects response, so our copy does not establish the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Oberman et al. 2020 source
- cites Philip et al. 2023 source
- Premisecitation
Randomised and naturalistic studies suggest that rTMS and theta-burst stimulation may reduce PTSD symptoms.
“Randomised and naturalistic studies suggest that rtMs and theta-burst stimulation may reduce PtsD symptoms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Chang et al. 2023 source
- cites Petrosino et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Philip et al. 2019 source
The Introduction says existing data suggest TMS is effective for PTSD, and the Results report reduced PTSD symptoms after intermittent theta-burst stimulation in a randomized study, particularly at one month after an unblinded treatment phase. Our copy does not identify a naturalistic study or establish that naturalistic studies support the claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Emerging reports support bilateral and accelerated approaches in patients with comorbid depressive and posttraumatic presentations.
“emerging reports support bilateral and accelerated approaches in patients with comorbid depressive and posttraumatic presentations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Chang et al. 2023 source
- cites Vaithianathan et al. 2022 source
The Discussion reports improvement in depressive and PTSD symptoms after bilateral sequential theta-burst stimulation in eight patients, supporting the bilateral part of the claim. The paper does not report an accelerated treatment approach for patients with both conditions; its Introduction describes shorter iTBS sessions, and its References list an accelerated study in major depression alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The magnitude and direction of effects observed in this study are broadly consistent with effect sizes reported in prior TMS/PTSD and TMS/depression literature.
“the magnitude and direction of effects observed here are broadly consistent with effect sizes reported in prior tMs/PtsD and tMs/depression literature”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Blumberger et al. 2018 source
- cites Kishi et al. 2024 source
The Results (Network meta-analysis results; page unavailable) report effect sizes and improvement in depression symptoms for two theta-burst stimulation protocols compared with sham. This supports the depression-literature portion, but the paper does not report PTSD effect sizes or compare its estimates with the citing study’s effects, so the claimed consistency across both literatures is not established. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Petrosino et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
No course was terminated for reasons attributable to stimulation-related intolerance.
“No course was terminated for reasons attributable to stimulation-related intolerance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Courses with and without an available Follow-up assessment did not differ on any baseline measure (PHQ-9, 13.8 vs 15.1; PCL-5 total, 43.6 vs 44.1; GAD-7, 12.9 vs 13.0; PSS, 25.0 vs 24.3; all p ≥ .39).
“courses with and without an available Follow-up assessment did not differ on any baseline measure (PhQ-9, 13.8 vs 15.1; Pcl-5 total, 43.6 vs 44.1; GaD-7, 12.9 vs 13.0; Pss, 25.0 vs 24.3; all p ≥ .39)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PCL-5 total scores decreased from Baseline to Follow-up (mean change, -8.61; 95% CI, -14.50 to -2.71; dz = -0.54; p = .008; n = 28).
“and to 35.0 (sD, 19.8) at Follow-up (mean change, -8.61; 95% ci, -14.50 to -2.71; dz = -0.54;p = .008;n = 28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Cluster C (avoidance) showed a significant Baseline-to-Follow-up reduction, mean change -0.93 (dz = -0.42; p = .036).
“cluster c (avoidance), -0.93 (dz = -0.42;p = .036)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
PHQ-9 scores decreased from Baseline to Follow-up (mean change from Baseline, -3.39 points; 95% CI, -5.48 to -1.30; dz = -0.60; p = .004; n = 28).
“and to 10.4 (sD, 6.0) at Follow-up (mean change from Baseline, -3.39 points; 95% ci, -5.48 to -1.30; dz = -0.60;p = .004;n = 28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Overall, 55 of 64 courses (85.9%; exact 95% CI, 75.0-93.4) received at least the targeted 80-session dose.
“Overall, 55 of 64 courses (85.9%; exact 95% ci, 75.0-93.4)received at least the targeted 80-session dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No treatment-emergent adverse events were documented in any of the 64 reviewed courses (0 of 64, 0.0%; exact 95% CI, 0.0-5.6).
“No treatment-emergent adverse events were documented in any of the 64 reviewed courses (0 of 64, 0.0%; exact 95% ci, 0.0-5.6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The routine clinical documentation of adverse events captures all treatment-emergent adverse events relevant to tolerability.
- Findingown data
All 64 courses adhered to the prespecified schedule of 20 sessions per day.
“all 64 courses adhered to the prespecified schedule of 20 sessions per day”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across all courses, mean total sessions delivered was 73.6 (SD, 17.5).
“across all courses, mean total sessions delivered was 73.6 (sD, 17.5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Paired within-patient analyses showed significant reductions in depressive and posttraumatic symptom severity at both Post-treatment and Follow-up.
“Paired within-patient analyses showed significant reductions in depressive and posttraumatic symptom severity at both Post-treatment and Follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
PCL-5 total scores decreased from 39.9 (SD, 20.3) to 32.6 (SD, 21.8) at Post-treatment (mean change, -7.34; 95% CI, -11.99 to -2.69; dz = -0.50; p = .004; n = 38).
“Pcl-5 total scores decreased from 39.9 (sD, 20.3) to 32.6 (sD, 21.8) at Post-treatment (mean change, -7.34; 95% ci, -11.99 to -2.69; dz = -0.50;p = .004;n = 38)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
PHQ-9 scores decreased from a Baseline mean of 12.9 (SD, 6.4) to 9.8 (SD, 6.6) at Post-treatment (mean change, -3.13 points; 95% CI, -4.92 to -1.34; Cohen dz = -0.55; p = .001; n = 39).
“PhQ-9 scores decreased from a Baseline mean of 12.9 (sD, 6.4) to 9.8 (sD, 6.6) at Post-treatment (mean change, -3.13 points; 95% ci, -4.92 to -1.34; cohen dz = -0.55;p = .001;n = 39)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Across PCL-5 symptom clusters, significant Baseline-to-Follow-up reductions were observed in cluster B (intrusion), mean change -2.39 (dz = -0.56; p = .007).
“cluster B (intrusion), mean change -2.39 (dz = -0.56;p = .007)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Cluster E (hyperarousal/reactivity) showed a significant Baseline-to-Follow-up reduction, mean change -3.32 (dz = -0.68; p = .001).
“cluster e (hyperarousal/reactivity), -3.32 (dz = -0.68;p = .001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
GAD-7 scores decreased from a Baseline mean of 11.3 (SD, 6.0) to 9.7 (SD, 6.5) at Post-treatment (mean change, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.91 to -0.32; dz = -0.42; p = .020; n = 34).
“GaD-7 scores decreased from a Baseline mean of 11.3 (sD, 6.0) to 9.7 (sD, 6.5) at Post-treatment (mean change, -1.62; 95% ci, -2.91 to -0.32; dz = -0.42;p = .020;n = 34)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Post-treatment questionnaire was available for 39 of 64 courses (60.9%).
“Post-treatment questionnaire available, no./total (%) | 39 / 64 (60.9)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Post-treatment, symptomatic remission was observed in 10 of 26 at-risk courses (38.5%) for PHQ-9.
“symptomatic remission-defined as a transition from a Baseline score at or above the validated cut-off to a current score below the cut-off, with the at-risk denominator restricted to courses whose Baseline score was at or above the cut-off-was observed at Post-treatment in 10 of 26 at-risk courses (38.5%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Post-treatment, overall clinical improvement was observed in 12 of 39 courses (30.8%) for PHQ-9.
“Overall clinical improvement-defined as the union of response and remission-was observed at Post-treatment in 12 of 39 courses (30.8%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
GAD-7 scores decreased from Baseline to Follow-up (mean change from Baseline, -3.63; 95% CI, -5.42 to -1.84; dz = -0.77; p < .001; n = 27).
“and to 9.3 (sD, 6.4) at Follow-up (mean change from Baseline, -3.63; 95% ci, -5.42 to -1.84; dz = -0.77;p < .001;n = 27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Follow-up, response rates increased to 14 of 28 (50.0%) for PCL-5 total.
“14 of 28 (50.0%) for Pcl-5 total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
PSS scores decreased from Baseline to Follow-up (mean change from Baseline, -2.67; 95% CI, -4.17 to -1.17; dz = -0.67; p = .002; n = 27).
“and to 22.3 (sD, 4.8) at Follow-up (mean change from Baseline, -2.67; 95% ci, -4.17 to -1.17; dz = -0.67;p = .002;n = 27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Follow-up, response rates increased to 12 of 27 (44.4%) for GAD-7.
“and 12 of 27 (44.4%)for GaD-7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Follow-up questionnaire was available for 28 of 64 courses (43.8%).
“follow-up questionnaire available, no./total (%) | 28 / 64 (43.8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Follow-up, overall clinical improvement was observed in 12 of 27 (44.4%) for GAD-7.
“and 12 of 27 (44.4%)for GaD-7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Follow-up, overall clinical improvement was observed in 14 of 28 (50.0%) for PCL-5 total.
“14 of 28 (50.0%) for Pcl-5 total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Post-treatment, overall clinical improvement was observed in 12 of 38 (31.6%) for PCL-5 total.
“12 of 38 (31.6%) for Pcl-5 total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Post-treatment, clinical response was observed in 12 of 38 courses (31.6%) for PCL-5 total.
“12 of 38 (31.6%) for Pcl-5 total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Overall clinical improvement rates increased from the Post-treatment to the Follow-up assessment.
“the observation that overall clinical improvement rates increased from the Post-treatment to the Follow-up assessment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among paired courses, 4 of 20 GAD-7 courses (20.0%) did not meet the overall clinical improvement criterion at Post-treatment but met it at Follow-up.
“4 of 20 GaD-7 courses (20.0%) did not meet the overall criterion at Post-treatment but met it at Follow-up”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Post-treatment, clinical response was observed in 10 of 39 courses (25.6%) for PHQ-9.
“at Post-treatment, clinical response-defined as ≥50% reduction from Baseline or an absolute decrease of at least the instrument MciD, whichever was met-was observed in 10 of 39 courses (25.6%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Follow-up, symptomatic remission was observed in 8 of 18 (44.4%) for GAD-7.
“and 8 of 18 (44.4%)for GaD-7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Courses lacking an immediate Post-treatment assessment were more severely symptomatic at baseline.
“the courses lacking an immediate Post-treatment assessment were more severely symptomatic at baseline”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At Post-treatment, clinical response was observed in 11 of 34 courses (32.4%) for GAD-7.
“and 11 of 34 (32.4%) for GaD-7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Courses with and without an available Follow-up assessment did not differ on any baseline severity measure.
“courses with and without an available Follow-up assessment did not differ on any baseline severity measure (table 6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Preliminary within-patient analyses showed consistent, medium-to-large-effect reductions in depressive, posttraumatic, anxiety, and perceived-stress symptoms through a short-term follow-up window.
“Preliminary within-patient analyses showed consistent, medium-to-large-effect reductions in depressive, posttraumatic, anxiety, and perceived-stress symptoms through a short-term follow-up window”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Follow-up, symptomatic remission was observed in 7 of 20 (35.0%) for PHQ-9.
“and at Follow-up in 7 of 20 (35.0%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
PSS scores decreased from a Baseline mean of 24.4 (SD, 6.5) to 23.1 (SD, 6.1) at Post-treatment (mean change, -1.32; 95% CI, -2.76 to 0.11; dz = -0.31; p = .08; n = 34).
“Pss scores decreased from a Baseline mean of 24.4 (sD, 6.5) to 23.1 (sD, 6.1) at Post-treatment (mean change, -1.32; 95% ci, -2.76 to 0.11; dz = -0.31;p = .08;n = 34)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Post-treatment, overall clinical improvement was observed in 11 of 34 (32.4%) for GAD-7.
“and 11 of 34 (32.4%) for GaD-7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
In the paired subset, the maintenance rate for PHQ-9 overall clinical improvement was 3 of 5 (60%).
“the maintenance rate was 3 of 5 (60%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Follow-up, response rates increased to 10 of 28 (35.7%) for PHQ-9.
“at Follow-up, response rates increased to 10 of 28 (35.7%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
At Post-treatment, symptomatic remission was observed in 4 of 17 (23.5%) for GAD-7.
“and 4 of 17 (23.5%)for GaD-7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
The protocol was tolerated without documented treatment-emergent adverse events.
“was tolerated without documented treatment-emergent adverse events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Median course duration was 3 days (IQR, 3-3).
“Median course duration, d (IQr) | 3 (3-3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the paired subset, the maintenance rate for GAD-7 overall clinical improvement was 3 of 6 (50%).
“3 of 6 (50%) for GaD-7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Follow-up, symptomatic remission was observed in 7 of 21 (33.3%) for PCL-5 total.
“7 of 21 (33.3%) for Pcl-5 total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
In the paired subset, every PCL-5 course that met the overall clinical improvement criterion at Post-treatment also met it at Follow-up (4 of 4, 100%).
“every Pcl-5 course that met the overall criterion at Post-treatment also met it at Follow-up (4 of 4, 100%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mean total sessions per course was 73.6 (SD 17.5).
“Mean total sessions per course (sD) | 73.6 (17.5)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In a single-site retrospective cohort of adults with PTSD, depressive disorder, and predominantly mild TBI, a 4-day accelerated bilateral iTBS protocol was feasible to deliver.
“in a single-site retrospective cohort of adults with PtsD, depressive disorder, and predominantly mild tBi, a 4-day accelerated bilateral itBs protocol was feasible to deliver”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
55 of 64 courses (85.9%) completed at least 80 sessions.
“courses with ≥80 sessions, no./total (%) [95% cI] 55 / 64 (85.9) [75.0-93.4]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At Follow-up, overall clinical improvement was observed in 12 of 28 (42.9%) for PHQ-9.
“and at Follow-up in 12 of 28 (42.9%) for PhQ-9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Findingown data
Baseline questionnaire was available for 63 of 64 courses (98.4%).
“Baseline questionnaire available, no./total (%) | 63 / 64 (98.4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At Post-treatment, symptomatic remission was observed in 7 of 25 (28.0%) for PCL-5 total.
“7 of 25 (28.0%) for Pcl-5 total”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
- Premisenone given
Evidence remains limited for bilateral, accelerated iTBS protocols delivered in routine outpatient care to patients with the full clinical triad of PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI.
“Nonetheless, evidence remains limited for bilateral, accelerated itBs protocols delivered in routine outpatient care to patients with the full clinical triad of PtsD, depressive disorder, and tBi.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The brief per-session duration of iTBS (approximately 3 min) has enabled the development of accelerated multi-session-per-day protocols that compress a full treatment course into days rather than weeks.
“the brief per-session duration of itBs-approximately 3 min-has enabled the development of accelerated multi-session-per-day protocols that compress a full treatment course into days rather than weeks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cole et al. 2022 source
- Interpretationown data
These findings provide a preliminary signal of symptomatic benefit across multiple psychiatric domains.
“provide a preliminary signal of symptomatic benefit across multiple psychiatric domains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The Post-treatment estimates may modestly understate early change in the most affected courses.
“the Post-treatment estimates may modestly understate early change in the most affected courses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Benefit from an accelerated bilateral iTBS course can continue to consolidate during the weeks following the last treatment day.
“benefit from an accelerated bilateral itBs course can continue to consolidate during the weeks following the last treatment day”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Post-treatment assessment alone may underestimate the proportion of courses that ultimately attain a clinically meaningful outcome.
“post-treatment assessment alone may underestimate the proportion of courses that ultimately attain a clinically meaningful outcome”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 45
- May combine two claims. 60
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationClinical response was defined as either a ≥50% reduction from Baseline or an absolute decrease from Baseline of at least the instrument's minimum clinically important difference (MCID; 5 points for PHQ-9; 10 points for PCL-5 total; 4 points for GAD-7), whichever criterion was met.
“clinical response was defined as either a ≥ 50% reduction from Baseline or an absolute decrease from Baseline of at least the instrument's minimum clinically important difference (MciD; 5 points for PhQ-9; 10 points for Pcl-5 total; 4 points for GaD-7), whichever criterion was met (Bauer-staeb et al. 2021;Kounali et al. 2022;löwe et al. 2004)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Bauer-Staeb et al. 2021 source
The Discussion reports that English primary-care services use a 4-point GAD-7 change to capture improvement, but describes it as a reliable-change threshold, not a fixed MCID. The paper's MCID estimates vary with baseline severity; its Discussion reports average estimates of 3.7 points for PHQ-9 and 3.3 for GAD-7. It does not establish the cited 5-point PHQ-9 or 10-point PCL-5 thresholds, or define response as either a 50% reduction from baseline or an MCID decrease. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Kounali et al. 2022 source
The Results (ROC analysis, Table 5; page unavailable) give improvement thresholds of about 2 points for PHQ-9 and 1–2 points for GAD-7, rather than the claimed MCIDs of 5 and 4 points. The Discussion (Implications; page unavailable) says roughly 20% change corresponded to an MCID at moderate and higher severity, not a general 50% response threshold. The paper does not assess PCL-5. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Löwe et al. 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationReporting followed the STROBE recommendations for cohort studies.
“Reporting followed the strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in epidemiology (stROBe) recommendations for cohort studies (von elm et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites von Elm et al. 2007 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationClinically significant depressive and posttraumatic symptoms persist in a substantial proportion of patients well beyond the acute injury period and contribute to prolonged disability, occupational disruption, and elevated health care utilisation.
“longitudinal data from civilian cohorts, including the tRacK-tBi study, indicate that clinically significant depressive and posttraumatic symptoms persist in a substantial proportion of patients well beyond the acute injury period and contribute to prolonged disability, occupational disruption, and elevated health care utilisation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Stein et al. 2019 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a validated, substantially abbreviated alternative that is noninferior to conventional 10-Hz rTMS for depression.
“intermittent theta-burst stimulation (itBs) is a validated, substantially abbreviated alternative that is noninferior to conventional 10-hz rtMs for depression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Blumberger et al. 2018 source
- cites Kishi et al. 2024 source
- cites Lefaucheur et al. 2020 source
Section 10.3 reports that iTBS sessions take about 3 minutes versus more than 20 minutes for standard rTMS, and describes a large study finding left-prefrontal iTBS noninferior to conventional high-frequency rTMS for depression. But the guidelines say the evidence for iTBS remained insufficient to make a recommendation, so calling it a validated alternative overstates their conclusion. The supplied passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder.
“Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtMs) is an established treatment for major depressive disorder”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe PCL-5 has demonstrated strong psychometric performance in civilian and veteran samples.
“the PtsD checklist for DsM-5 (Pcl-5) was used to quantify overall posttraumatic symptom burden and symptom-cluster scores for cluster B (intrusion), cluster c (avoidance), cluster D (negative alterations in cognition and mood), and cluster e (hyperarousal/reactivity); the Pcl-5 has demonstrated strong psychometric performance in civilian and veteran samples (Blevins et al. 2015;Bovin et al. 2016;W”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Blevins et al. 2015 source
- cites Bovin et al. 2016 source
- cites Weathers et al. 2018 source
The Method (Measures: Sample 1; page not available) says PCL-5 scores have excellent psychometric properties and reports an internal-consistency alpha of .93. The Results (Convergent and discriminant validity) also report a strong correlation with CAPS-5 in the veteran sample. Our copy does not explicitly establish psychometric performance in civilian samples; its separate discussion of the PCL-C is not evidence for that part of the PCL-5 claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe PHQ-9 has established psychometric properties and sensitivity to change in the general population and in TBI samples.
“the Patient health Questionnaire-9 (PhQ-9) was used to quantify depressive symptom severity; the instrument has established psychometric properties and sensitivity to change in the general population and in tBi samples (Fann et al. 2005;Kroenke et al. 2001;löwe et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Fann et al. 2005 source
- cites Kroenke et al. 2001 source
The Discussion reports strong validity evidence for the PHQ-9 in primary-care and obstetrics–gynecology patients. It also says the study was cross-sectional and that longitudinal studies were needed to establish sensitivity to change. This paper does not establish those properties in the general population or TBI samples. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Löwe et al. 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe present cohort required the co-occurrence of PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI, whereas much of the published evidence derives from cohorts selected for a single psychiatric diagnosis or for military service.
“this cohort required the co-occurrence of PtsD, depressive disorder, and tBi, whereas much of the published evidence derives from cohorts selected for a single psychiatric diagnosis or for military service”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Madore et al. 2022 source
The Methods (Referral and Treatment Information; page unavailable) describe a cohort of VA patients recommended to have an MDD diagnosis, with PTSD permitted but not required. This supports the cited paper as an example of evidence from a military-veteran cohort that did not require all three conditions. It does not establish that *much* of the published evidence uses such cohorts; the requirement for PTSD, depression, and TBI describes the citing authors’ own cohort, not this source’s. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Oberman et al. 2020 source
The Results sections on depressive and PTSD symptoms describe trials focused on one primary outcome and trials involving service members or veterans, supporting the broad contrast with the citing authors’ cohort. The paper does not establish that those cohorts were selected for a single psychiatric diagnosis; a primary outcome is not necessarily an enrollment criterion. The citing authors’ own cohort requirements are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Petrosino et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDepression and PTSD-the two domains for which TMS and theta-burst stimulation are most extensively supported-improved significantly at both post-treatment and follow-up.
“Depression and PtsD-the two domains for which tMs and theta-burst stimulation are most extensively supported (Blumberger et al. 2018;cole et al. 2022;Kishi et al. 2024;Petrosino et al. 2020;Philip et al. 2019)-improved significantly at both post-treatment and follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Blumberger et al. 2018 source
- cites Cole et al. 2022 source
- cites Kishi et al. 2024 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says rTMS is recommended for treatment-resistant depression and that iTBS is approved for depression; the Results report improved depression outcomes with some TBS protocols. The paper does not address PTSD or compare which clinical domains have the most extensive support. The citation is attached to that background characterization, not to the citing authors’ post-treatment and follow-up results. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe protocol was bilateral and accelerated, combining two design features that are individually supported but less commonly reported in combination.
“the protocol was bilateral and accelerated, combining two design features that are individually supported but less commonly reported in combination”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Cole et al. 2022 source
- cites Vaithianathan et al. 2022 source
The Introduction and Methods describe a bilateral protocol, and the Discussion says studies using bilateral TBS were scarce. But the Methods report 19–30 sessions over 4–6 weeks, not an accelerated schedule. The paper therefore does not support the claim that this protocol combined bilateral and accelerated delivery. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe present estimate (exact 95% CI upper bound 5.6%) is consistent with the broader safety profile of iTBS established in large multicentre trials including THREE-D, and with emerging bilateral accelerated reports in trauma-related populations.
“the present estimate (exact 95% ci upper bound 5.6%) is consistent with the broader safety profile of itBs established in large multicentre trials including thRee-D (Blumberger et al. 2018), and with emerging bilateral accelerated reports in trauma-related populations (chang et al. 2023;Vaithianathan et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis cluster-specific pattern is consistent with neurobiological models implicating prefrontal-limbic regulation of arousal as a proximal mechanism of TMS effects in trauma-related populations, although the limited number of courses contributing to each cluster-level comparison (n ≈ 28 at Follow-up) reduces the precision of these estimates and warrants cautious interpretation.
“this cluster-specific pattern is consistent with neurobiological models implicating prefrontal-limbic regulation of arousal as a proximal mechanism of tMs effects in trauma-related populations, although the limited number of courses contributing to each cluster-level comparison (n ≈ 28 at Follow-up) reduces the precision of these estimates and warrants cautious interpretation (Petrosino et al. 202”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Petrosino et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Philip et al. 2019 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataForty-seven of 59 courses with available data (79.7%) had no documented prior TBI.
“Forty-seven of 59 courses with available data (79.7%) had no documented prior tBi.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCourses lacking a Post-treatment assessment had higher baseline severity than those with one on PHQ-9 (17.2 vs 12.9; p = .011), PCL-5 total (50.5 vs 39.9; p = .025), and GAD-7 (15.3 vs 11.7; p = .017), but not PSS (p = .33).
“whereas courses lacking a Post-treatment assessment had higher baseline severity than those with one on PhQ-9 (17.2 vs 12.9; p = .011),Pcl-5 total (50.5 vs 39.9; p = .025),and GaD-7 (15.3 vs 11.7; p = .017),but not Pss (p = .33)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMotor vehicle collision was the predominant mechanism of injury (52 of 64 courses, 81.3%), followed by fall (8 of 64, 12.5%), and assault (1 of 64, 1.6%); three courses (4.7%) did not have a documented external precipitating injury.
“Motor vehicle collision was the predominant mechanism of injury (52 of 64 courses, 81.3%), followed by fall (8 of 64, 12.5%), and assault (1 of 64, 1.6%); three courses (4.7%) did not have a documented external precipitating injury.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFifty-four of 64 courses (84.4%; exact 95% CI, 73.1-92.2) completed the prespecified 80-session protocol, and one additional course received 90 sessions (an intentional extension documented in the clinical record).
“Fifty-four of 64 courses (84.4%; exact 95% ci, 73.1-92.2) completed the prespecified 80-session protocol, and one additional course received 90 sessions (an intentional extension documented in the clinical record).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe remaining 9 courses (14.1%) received a shortened dose, with the distribution consisting of 10 sessions (n = 1), 20 sessions (n = 3), 40 sessions (n = 3), 48 sessions (n = 1), and 60 sessions (n = 1); in each case the clinical record documented early termination for logistical reasons rather than intolerance or adverse events.
“the remaining 9 courses (14.1%) received a shortened dose, with the distribution consisting of 10 sessions (n = 1), 20 sessions (n = 3), 40 sessions (n = 3), 48 sessions (n = 1), and 60 sessions (n = 1); in each case the clinical record documented early termination for logistical reasons rather than intolerance or adverse events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data32 of 64 courses (50.0%) were delivered to female patients; at the patient level, 29 of 55 patients (52.7%) were female.
“32 of 64 courses (50.0%) were delivered to female patients; at the patient level, 29 of 55 patients (52.7%) were female.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTBI severity was classified as mild in 63 of 64 courses (98.4%); one course was delivered to a patient whose injury did not meet diagnostic criteria for TBI but who was retained in the clinical pathway because of concordant clinical features.
“tBi severity was classified as mild in 63 of 64 courses (98.4%); one course was delivered to a patient whose injury did not meet diagnostic criteria for tBi but who was retained in the clinical pathway because of concordant clinical features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical diagnoses recorded in the chart accurately identify PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo reviewed record documented seizure, syncope, persistent headache requiring medical evaluation, or site-specific adverse effects.
“no reviewed record documented seizure, syncope, persistent headache requiring medical evaluation, or site-specific adverse effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The routine clinical documentation of adverse events captures all treatment-emergent adverse events relevant to tolerability.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster D (negative alterations in cognition and mood) showed a numeric reduction at Follow-up, mean change -1.93 (dz = -0.31; p = .12), not reaching conventional significance at Follow-up but significant at Post-treatment.
“cluster D (negative alterations in cognition and mood), -1.93 (dz = -0.31;p = .12;numeric reduction not reaching the conventional significance threshold at Follow-up but significant at Post-treatment)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMean age at injury was 36.7 years (SD 11.4; range 18-69).
“the mean age at injury was 36.7 years (sD, 11.4; range, 18-69)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBaseline questionnaires were available for 63 of 64 courses, Post-treatment questionnaires for 39 (60.9%), and Follow-up questionnaires for 28 (43.8%).
“Baseline questionnaires were available for 63 of 64 courses, Post-treatment questionnaires for 39 (60.9%), and Follow-up questionnaires for 28 (43.8%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSixty-four consecutive accelerated bilateral iTBS courses were delivered to 55 unique adults (nine patients received two or more separate courses) and met inclusion criteria.
“sixty-four consecutive accelerated bilateral itBs courses were delivered to 55 unique adults (nine patients received two or more separate courses during the study window) and met inclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical diagnoses recorded in the chart accurately identify PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe median course duration was 3 calendar days (IQR, 3-3), consistent with the 4-day accelerated schedule.
“the median course duration was 3 calendar days (interquartile range [iQR], 3-3), consistent with the 4-day accelerated schedule.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth the structured tolerability field and the free-text description were negative in all cases.
“Both the structured tolerability field and the free-text description were negative in all cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The routine clinical documentation of adverse events captures all treatment-emergent adverse events relevant to tolerability.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNonadherence was attributable to logistical rather than clinical causes, and all courses that began treatment received the intended 20 sessions per day.
“Nonadherence was attributable to logistical rather than clinical causes, and all courses that began treatment received the intended 20 sessions per day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt Follow-up, overall clinical improvement was 42.9% for PHQ-9, 50.0% for PCL-5 total, and 44.4% for GAD-7, exceeding the corresponding Post-treatment proportions (30.8%, 31.6%, and 32.4%, respectively).
“at Follow-up, overall clinical improvement was 42.9% for PhQ-9, 50.0% for Pcl-5 total, and 44.4% for GaD-7, exceeding the corresponding Post-treatment proportions (30.8%, 31.6%, and 32.4%, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 21 courses with paired PHQ-9 data at both time points, 3 (14.3%) met the overall criterion at Post-treatment and sustained it at Follow-up, 2 (9.5%) met the criterion at Post-treatment but not at Follow-up, 6 (28.6%) met the criterion at Follow-up without having met it at Post-treatment (delayed response), and 10 (47.6%) met the criterion at neither time point.
“among the 21 courses with paired PhQ-9 data at both time points, 3 (14.3%)met the overall criterion at Post-treatment and sustained it at Follow-up, 2 (9.5%) met the criterion at Post-treatment but not at Follow-up, 6 (28.6%) met the criterion at Follow-up without having met it at Post-treatment (delayed response), and 10 (47.6%) met the criterion at neither time point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe median follow-up interval was 39 days (IQR, 33-48).
“Median follow-up interval, d (IQr) | 39 (33-48)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 20 courses with paired PCL-5 total data, 4 sustained (20.0%), 0 not maintained (0.0%), 4 delayed (20.0%), and 12 no response at either time point (60.0%); no PCL-5 responder present at Post-treatment failed to maintain response at Follow-up (maintenance rate, 4 of 4, 100%).
“among the 20 courses with paired Pcl-5 total data, the corresponding figures were 4 sustained (20.0%), 0 not maintained (0.0%), 4 delayed (20.0%), and 12 no response at either time point (60.0%);notably, no Pcl-5 responder present at Post-treatment failed to maintain response at Follow-up (maintenance rate, 4 of 4, 100%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PSS showed a similar pattern, with a nonsignificant immediate post-treatment change but a medium-sized and significant reduction at follow-up.
“the Pss showed a similar pattern, with a nonsignificant immediate post-treatment change but a medium-sized and significant reduction at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong the 20 courses with paired GAD-7 data, 3 sustained (15.0%), 3 not maintained (15.0%), 4 delayed (20.0%), and 10 no response at either time point (50.0%).
“among the 20 courses with paired GaD-7 data, the corresponding figures were 3 sustained (15.0%), 3 not maintained (15.0%), 4 delayed (20.0%), and 10 no response at either time point (50.0%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFollow-up assessments were available for 28 of 64 courses (43.8%), creating potential follow-up bias.
“follow-up assessments were available for 28 of 64 courses (43.8%), creating potential follow-up bias”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin the PCL-5, all four symptom clusters improved, with the largest standardised effect in cluster E (hyperarousal/reactivity).
“Within the Pcl-5, all four symptom clusters improved, with the largest standardised effect in cluster e (hyperarousal/reactivity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningiTBS is a non-invasive, non-systemic intervention that avoids the systemic drug exposure, polypharmacy, and cognitive side effects that frequently limit pharmacotherapy after TBI.
“as a non-invasive, non-systemic intervention it avoids the systemic drug exposure, polypharmacy, and cognitive side effects that frequently limit pharmacotherapy after tBi”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe PSS quantifies the extent to which situations in the patient's life were appraised as stressful over the preceding month.
“the 10-item Perceived stress scale (Pss) was used to quantify the extent to which situations in the patient's life were appraised as stressful over the preceding month (cohen et al. 1983).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al. 1983 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe largest cluster-level effect was observed in cluster E, consistent with previous reports implicating hyperarousal as a proximal target of prefrontal TMS in trauma-related populations.
“the largest cluster-level effect was observed in cluster e, consistent with previous reports implicating hyperarousal as a proximal target of prefrontal tMs in trauma-related populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenFollow-up assessments were those obtained ≥28 days after the last treatment day and prior to the start of any subsequent TMS course.
“Follow-up assessments were those obtained ≥28 days after the last treatment day and prior to the start of any subsequent tMs course.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningRemission rates were expressed relative to an at-risk denominator comprising paired courses whose Baseline score was at or above the cut-off.
“remission rates were expressed relative to an at-risk denominator comprising paired courses whose Baseline score was at or above the cut-off, because courses already below the cut-off at Baseline cannot experience the transition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningWhen multiple eligible assessments existed, the earliest qualifying assessment was used to reduce selection bias.
“When multiple eligible assessments existed, the earliest qualifying assessment was used to reduce selection bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause validated dichotomous cut-offs are not established for the Perceived Stress Scale, categorical clinical outcomes were not computed for PSS and were restricted to PHQ-9, PCL-5 total, and GAD-7.
“Because validated dichotomous cut-offs are not established for the Perceived stress scale, categorical clinical outcomes were not computed for Pss and were restricted to PhQ-9, Pcl-5 total, and GaD-7.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataPost-treatment assessments were those obtained between the final treatment day and 27 days thereafter.
“Post-treatment assessments were those obtained between the final treatment day and 27 days thereafter, capturing the immediate post-course evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAnalyses of within-patient symptom change were conducted among patients with the relevant paired assessments available.
“analyses of within-patient symptom change were conducted among patients with the relevant paired assessments available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBefore efficacy can be adjudicated in controlled trials, two prerequisites must be addressed: whether such an intensive protocol is feasible to deliver in a community outpatient setting, and whether it is tolerated by patients whose comorbid neurologic and psychiatric burden may increase susceptibility to stimulation-related side effects.
“Before efficacy can be adjudicated in controlled trials, two prerequisites must be addressed: whether such an intensive protocol is feasible to deliver in a community outpatient setting, and whether it is tolerated by patients whose comorbid neurologic and psychiatric burden may increase susceptibility to stimulation-related side effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMore severely symptomatic courses were less likely to have an immediate Post-treatment questionnaire while availability of the longer-term Follow-up assessment was unrelated to baseline severity.
“indicating that more severely symptomatic courses were less likely to have an immediate Post-treatment questionnaire while availability of the longer-term Follow-up assessment was unrelated to baseline severity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA total score ≥33 on the PCL-5 is commonly used as a screening threshold suggestive of probable PTSD.
“a total score ≥33 is commonly used as a screening threshold suggestive of probable PtsD (U.s.Department of Veterans affairs, National center for PtsD, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFeasibility was operationalised a priori as the proportion of courses that reached the prespecified treatment dose of ≥80 sessions, together with adherence to the 20-session-per-day schedule.
“Feasibility was operationalised a priori as the proportion of courses that reached the prespecified treatment dose of ≥80 sessions, together with adherence to the 20-session-per-day schedule.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataInclusion required established clinical diagnoses of PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI recorded prior to TMS initiation.
“inclusion required established clinical diagnoses of PtsD, depressive disorder, and tBi recorded prior to tMs initiation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical diagnoses recorded in the chart accurately identify PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSymptomatic remission was defined as a transition from a Baseline score at or above the validated clinical cut-off to a current score below the cut-off (PHQ-9 < 10, PCL-5 total <33, GAD-7 < 10).
“symptomatic remission was defined as a transition from a Baseline score at or above the validated clinical cut-off to a current score below the cut-off (PhQ-9 < 10, Pcl-5 total <33, GaD-7 < 10)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningWithin-patient change in continuous symptom scores was analysed with paired t tests; the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was reported as a sensitivity analysis.
“Within-patient change in continuous symptom scores was analysed with paired t tests; the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was reported as a sensitivity analysis given the potential for non-normality in clinical score distributions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningiTBS directly engages the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and connected prefrontal-limbic circuitry implicated in the dysregulation of mood, arousal, and executive control that is common after brain injury.
“it directly engages the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and connected prefrontal-limbic circuitry implicated in the dysregulation of mood, arousal, and executive control that is common after brain injury”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe established safety record of accelerated and theta-burst protocols mitigates the theoretical concern of seizure with intensive stimulation.
“and the established safety record of accelerated and theta-burst protocols mitigates the theoretical concern of seizure with intensive stimulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataBaseline symptom severity was compared between courses with and without an available Post-treatment assessment, and between courses with and without an available Follow-up assessment, using Welch t tests with Mann-Whitney U tests as a sensitivity analysis.
“to assess whether the courses contributing paired outcome data were representative of the full cohort, baseline symptom severity was compared between courses with and without an available Post-treatment assessment, and between courses with and without an available Follow-up assessment, using Welch t tests with Mann-Whitney U tests as a sensitivity analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenTwo-sided P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
“two-sided P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenTolerability was operationalised as the proportion of courses in which treatment-emergent adverse events were documented during routine clinical monitoring.
“tolerability was operationalised as the proportion of courses in which treatment-emergent adverse events were documented during routine clinical monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccelerated multi-session-per-day iTBS protocols have demonstrated safety and, in recent controlled trials such as SAINT, rapid antidepressant effects.
“with demonstrated safety and, in recent controlled trials such as saiNt, rapid antidepressant effects”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cole et al. 2022 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBecause all outcomes were prespecified with a hierarchical primary/secondary/tertiary structure, no formal correction for multiple comparisons was applied; exploratory findings are interpreted accordingly.
“Because all outcomes were prespecified with a hierarchical primary/secondary/tertiary structure, no formal correction for multiple comparisons was applied; exploratory findings are interpreted accordingly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningAll treatment courses, regardless of the number of sessions completed, were retained for feasibility and tolerability analyses to avoid completer bias.
“all treatment courses, regardless of the number of sessions completed, were retained for feasibility and tolerability analyses to avoid completer bias”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll analyses were performed in Python 3.10 using the pandas and SciPy libraries.
“all analyses were performed in Python 3.10 using the pandas and sciPy libraries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningAccelerated delivery carries particular appeal in TBI populations, in whom cognitive, occupational, and geographic barriers can limit adherence to prolonged daily treatment courses.
“accelerated delivery carries particular appeal in tBi populations, in whom cognitive, occupational, and geographic barriers can limit adherence to prolonged daily treatment courses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll consecutive TMS treatment courses labelled under the PTSD + Depression clinical pathway between clinic inception and the data-lock date were included.
“all consecutive tMs treatment courses labelled under the PtsD + Depression clinical pathway between clinic inception and the data-lock date were included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe GAD-7 has established reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.
“the Generalised anxiety Disorder-7 (GaD-7) was used to quantify anxiety symptom severity, with established reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change (spitzer et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Spitzer et al. 2006 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThree categorical clinical outcomes were prespecified for each instrument: clinical response, symptomatic remission, and overall clinical improvement.
“three categorical clinical outcomes were prespecified for each instrument: clinical response, symptomatic remission, and overall clinical improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDiagnoses were clinical rather than derived from structured research interviews.
“diagnoses were clinical rather than derived from structured research interviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical diagnoses recorded in the chart accurately identify PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenBaseline was defined as the most recent assessment obtained within 30 days prior to or on the first day of treatment.
“Baseline was defined as the most recent assessment obtained within 30 days prior to or on the first day of treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDocumentation followed the standard clinic protocol of explicit adverse-event screening at each treatment session and at the post-treatment visit; the electronic record supplied both a structured yes/no field and a free-text description.
“Documentation followed the standard clinic protocol of explicit adverse-event screening at each treatment session and at the post-treatment visit; the electronic record supplied both a structured yes/no field and a free-text description.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPTSD has most consistently been treated by targeting the right DLPFC, stimulation of which produces large reductions in posttraumatic symptoms together with concurrent improvement in anxiety and depression.
“PtsD, by contrast, has most consistently been treated by targeting the right DlPFc, stimulation of which produces large reductions in posttraumatic symptoms together with concurrent improvement in anxiety and depression”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berlim & Van den Eynde, 2014 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenOverall clinical improvement was defined as the union of response and remission.
“Overall clinical improvement was defined as the union of response and remission.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPaired analyses demonstrated consistent, clinically interpretable symptom reductions across the depressive, posttraumatic, anxiety, and perceived-stress domains, with standardised effect sizes in the medium-to-large range at short-term follow-up.
“Paired analyses demonstrated consistent, clinically interpretable symptom reductions across the depressive, posttraumatic, anxiety, and perceived-stress domains, with standardised effect sizes in the medium-to-large range at short-term follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
- Rests on an assumption: The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe present Follow-up window (median, 39 days) is sufficient to demonstrate short-term consolidation of benefit but not sufficient to adjudicate durability, relapse, or the time course of benefit.
“the Follow-up window (median, 39 days) is sufficient to detect short-term consolidation of benefit but is not sufficient to adjudicate durability”
- Also stated in: § Implications and future directions · boosted
“the present Follow-up window (median, 39 days; iQR, 33-48) is sufficient to demonstrate that benefit continues to consolidate after the last treatment day, but is not sufficient to characterise durability, relapse, or the time course over which benefit either stabilises or attenuates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Implications and future directions · boosted
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenDiagnoses were clinical; structured research interviews were not performed.
“diagnoses were clinical; structured research interviews were not performed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningNatural recovery, regression to the mean, concurrent psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, and general effects of contact with a specialty service cannot be excluded as explanations for the observed changes.
“natural recovery, regression to the mean, concurrent psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy, and general effects of contact with a specialty service cannot be excluded”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis incremental Follow-up benefit across all three instruments is consistent with the dz trajectory described above for the continuous outcomes and suggests that the full clinical impact of an accelerated bilateral iTBS course is not captured at the immediate post-course assessment.
“this incremental Follow-up benefit across all three instruments is consistent with the dz trajectory described above for the continuous outcomes and suggests that the full clinical impact of an accelerated bilateral itBs course is not captured at the immediate post-course assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe tolerability estimate is derived from routine clinical documentation rather than a structured adverse-event instrument; mild transient side effects such as scalp discomfort or self-limited headaches may be underrepresented if not separately prompted.
“it is nonetheless derived from routine clinical documentation rather than a structured adverse-event instrument; mild transient side effects such as scalp discomfort or self-limited headaches may be underrepresented if not separately prompted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The routine clinical documentation of adverse events captures all treatment-emergent adverse events relevant to tolerability.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThese findings provide a practical evidence base to inform the design of prospective controlled studies of accelerated bilateral iTBS in this clinically complex population.
“these findings provide a practical evidence base to inform the design of prospective controlled studies of accelerated bilateral itBs in this clinically complex population”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe cohort was predominantly composed of mild TBI after motor vehicle collision at a single site, which may limit generalisability to other TBI mechanisms, severities, and care settings.
“the cohort was predominantly composed of mild tBi after motor vehicle collision at a single site, which may limit generalisability to other tBi mechanisms, severities, and care settings”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPatients with incomplete follow-up could still differ from those with complete follow-up in ways not captured by the available covariates.
“patients with incomplete follow-up could still differ from those with complete follow-up in ways not captured by the available covariates”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe design was retrospective and uncontrolled, precluding causal inference.
“the design was retrospective and uncontrolled, precluding causal inference”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe GAD-7 trajectory was notable: the baseline-to-follow-up effect size (dz = -0.77) was the largest observed in this cohort, and exceeded the corresponding baseline-to-post-treatment effect, suggesting a possible progressive anxiolytic trajectory during the first month after stimulation.
“the GaD-7 trajectory was notable: the baseline-to-follow-up effect size (dz = -0.77)was the largest observed in this cohort, and exceeded the corresponding baseline-to-post-treatment effect, suggesting a possible progressive anxiolytic trajectory during the first month after stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn this retrospective cohort of 64 consecutive accelerated bilateral iTBS courses delivered in a specialty outpatient pathway to adults with PTSD, depressive disorder, and predominantly mild TBI, the protocol was feasible to deliver as designed and was tolerated without chart-documented treatment-emergent adverse events.
“in this retrospective cohort of 64 consecutive accelerated bilateral itBs courses delivered in a specialty outpatient pathway to adults with PtsD, depressive disorder, and predominantly mild tBi, the protocol was feasible to deliver as designed and was tolerated without chart-documented treatment-emergent adverse events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The routine clinical documentation of adverse events captures all treatment-emergent adverse events relevant to tolerability.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe maintenance estimates derived here (e.g., 100% for PCL-5 total at a median of 39 days) should not be extrapolated to later time points without prospective 3-month and 6-month re-assessment.
“the maintenance estimates derived here (for example, 100% for Pcl-5 total at a median of 39 days) should not be extrapolated to later time points without prospective 3-month and 6-month re-assessment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAcross all three instruments, the overall rate at Follow-up exceeded the overall rate at Post-treatment, consistent with continued symptomatic consolidation during the first month after treatment.
“across all three instruments, the overall rate at Follow-up exceeded the overall rate at Post-treatment, consistent with continued symptomatic consolidation during the first month after treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough the findings were consistent across domains and measures, the sample size is modest and comparative efficacy versus alternative TMS protocols cannot be adjudicated.
“although the findings were consistent across domains and measures, the sample size is modest and comparative efficacy versus alternative tMs protocols cannot be adjudicated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe delayed-response signal may further expand with longer follow-up.
“the delayed-response signal described above may further expand with longer follow-up”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe protocol's compressed 4-day schedule shortens the treatment window from the conventional 4-6 weeks of daily rTMS to less than a week of intensive treatment, and in this cohort 85.9% of courses reached the prespecified 80-session dose.
“the protocol's compressed 4-day schedule shortens the treatment window from the conventional 4-6 weeks of daily rtMs to less than a week of intensive treatment, and in this cohort 85.9% of courses reached the prespecified 80-session dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese findings support the feasibility and short-term tolerability of a 4-day accelerated bilateral iTBS protocol in a clinically complex PTSD, depression, and TBI population.
“these findings support the feasibility and short-term tolerability of a 4-day accelerated bilateral itBs protocol in a clinically complex PtsD, depression, and tBi population”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTolerability was ascertained from clinical documentation rather than a structured patient-reported adverse-event instrument, which may underestimate low-grade side effects.
“tolerability was ascertained from clinical documentation rather than a structured patient-reported adverse-event instrument, which may underestimate low-grade side effects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTogether, these findings indicate that the clinical benefit of accelerated bilateral iTBS in this population may not be fully captured at the immediate post-treatment assessment and may continue to consolidate over the subsequent weeks.
“together, these findings indicate that the clinical benefit of accelerated bilateral itBs in this population may not be fully captured at the immediate post-treatment assessment and may continue to consolidate over the subsequent weeks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBoth tertiary outcomes showed larger within-patient improvement at Follow-up than at the immediate Post-treatment assessment, suggesting a progressive rather than a peak-and-return trajectory within the short-term Follow-up window.
“Both tertiary outcomes showed larger within-patient improvement at Follow-up than at the immediate Post-treatment assessment, suggesting a progressive rather than a peak-and-return trajectory within the short-term Follow-up window.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese findings extend the growing literature supporting accelerated iTBS as a practical, time-efficient alternative to conventional rTMS and provide an early signal that bilateral prefrontal delivery may be appropriate in a complex TBI-related clinical population.
“these findings extend the growing literature supporting accelerated itBs as a practical, time-efficient alternative to conventional rtMs and provide an early signal that bilateral prefrontal delivery may be appropriate in a complex tBi-related clinical population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The cohort is representative of the broader population of adults with PTSD, depressive disorder, and mild TBI receiving accelerated bilateral iTBS in routine outpatient care.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe cohort was drawn from routine outpatient care, which provides external validity for community delivery but limits the ability to enforce uniform follow-up timing or structured adverse-event capture.
“the cohort was drawn from routine outpatient care, which provides external validity for community delivery but limits the ability to enforce uniform follow-up timing or structured adverse-event capture”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical diagnoses recorded in the chart accurately identify PTSD, depressive disorder, and TBI.
“inclusion required established clinical diagnoses of PtsD, depressive disorder, and tBi recorded prior to tMs initiation; diagnoses were clinical rather than derived from structured research interviews.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The observed symptom improvements are attributable to the iTBS protocol rather than to natural recovery, regression to the mean, or concurrent treatments.
“Paired analyses demonstrated consistent, clinically interpretable symptom reductions across the depressive, posttraumatic, anxiety, and perceived-stress domains”
The paper relies on this without support.
The missing post-treatment assessments do not substantially bias the estimated within-patient symptom changes.
“whereas courses lacking a Post-treatment assessment had higher baseline severity than those with one on PhQ-9 (17.2 vs 12.9; p = .011),Pcl-5 total (50.5 vs 39.9; p = .025),and GaD-7 (15.3 vs 11.7; p = .017),but not Pss (p = .33)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The routine clinical documentation of adverse events captures all treatment-emergent adverse events relevant to tolerability.
“it is nonetheless derived from routine clinical documentation rather than a structured adverse-event instrument; mild transient side effects such as scalp discomfort or self-limited headaches may be underrepresented if not separately prompted.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cohort is representative of the broader population of adults with PTSD, depressive disorder, and mild TBI receiving accelerated bilateral iTBS in routine outpatient care.
“these findings extend the growing literature supporting accelerated itBs as a practical, time-efficient alternative to conventional rtMs and provide an early signal that bilateral prefrontal delivery may be appropriate in a complex tBi-related clinical population.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
All four PTSD clusters are called significant despite a nonsignificant result
MinorThe claim that all four baseline-to-follow-up cluster reductions were significant conflicts with the reported cluster D result of p = .12. The text itself notes that this reduction did not reach the significance threshold.
“significant Baseline-to-Follow-up reductions were observed in all four domains”
“cluster D (negative alterations in cognition and mood), -1.93 (dz = -0.31;p = .12;numeric reduction not reaching the conventional significance threshold at Follow-up”
A course without a qualifying TBI was included despite the eligibility rule
MinorEligibility required an established TBI diagnosis before treatment, but the results say one included course was delivered to a patient whose injury did not meet TBI diagnostic criteria.
“inclusion required established clinical diagnoses of PtsD, depressive disorder, and tBi recorded prior to tMs initiation”
“one course was delivered to a patient whose injury did not meet diagnostic criteria for tBi but who was retained in the clinical pathway because of concordant clinical features.”
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807 · see citing works
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765 · see citing works
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020 · see citing works
Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22059 · Cited by 5,233 · see citing works
Bovin, M. J., Marx, B. P., Weathers, F. W., Gallagher, M. W., Rodriguez, P., Schnurr, P. P., & Keane, T. M. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000254 · Cited by 2,532 · see citing works
Lefaucheur, J.-P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Di Lazzaro, V., Filipović, S. R., Grefkes, C., Hasan, A., Hummel, F. C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002 · Cited by 2,382 · see citing works
Weathers, F. W., Bovin, M. J., Lee, D. J., Sloan, D. M., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Keane, T. M., & Marx, B. P. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000486 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
Löwe, B., Kroenke, K., Herzog, W., & Gräfe, K. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(03)00198-8 · Cited by 1,558 · cited 6× · see citing works
“…instrument McID, whichever is met (5 points for PhQ-9; 10 points for Pcl-5 total; 4 points for GaD-7) (Bauer-staeb et al. 2021; Kounali et al. 2022; löwe et al. 2004). remission is a transition from a Baseline score at or above the validated cut-off to a current score below the cut-off (PhQ-9 <…”
InfluentialBlumberger, D. M., Vila-Rodriguez, F., Thorpe, K. E., Feffer, K., Noda, Y., Giacobbe, P., Knyahnytska, Y., Kennedy, S. H., Lam, R. W., Daskalakis, Z. J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30295-2 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Cole, E. J., Phillips, A. L., Bentzley, B. S., Stimpson, K. H., Nejad, R., Barmak, F., Veerapal, C., Khan, N., Cherian, K., Felber, E., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429 · Cited by 795 · see citing works
Rates of Major Depressive Disorder and Clinical Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Bombardier, C. H. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.599 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and chronic cognitive impairment: A scoping review
McInnes, K., Friesen, C. L., MacKenzie, D. E., Westwood, D. A., & Boe, S. G. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174847 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Mutz, J., Vipulananthan, V., Carter, B., Hurlemann, R., Fu, C. H. Y., & Young, A. H. (2019) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.l1079 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Fann, J. R., Bombardier, C. H., Dikmen, S., Esselman, P., Warms, C. A., Pelzer, E., Rau, H., & Temkin, N. (2005) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-200511000-00003 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Exploring the convergence of posttraumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury
Stein, M. B., & McAllister, T. W. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101604 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Stein, M. B., Jain, S., Giacino, J. T., Levin, H., Dikmen, S., Nelson, L. D., Vassar, M. J., Okonkwo, D. O., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Robertson, C. S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4288 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Philip, N. S., Barredo, J., Aiken, E., Larson, V., Jones, R. N., Shea, M. T., Greenberg, B. D., & van ’t Wout-Frank, M. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18101160 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
How much change is enough? Evidence from a longitudinal study on depression in UK primary care
Kounali, D., Button, K. S., Lewis, G., Gilbody, S., Kessler, D., Araya, R., Duffy, L., Lanham, P., Peters, T. J., Wiles, N., et al. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003700 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Berlim, M. T., den Eynde, F. V., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291712002802 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Bauer-Staeb, C., Kounali, D.-Z., Welton, N. J., Griffith, E., Wiles, N. J., Lewis, G., Faraway, J. J., & Button, K. S. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.002 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Berlim, M. T., & Van den Eynde, F. (2014) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371405900905 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Theta burst stimulation for depression: a systematic review and network and pairwise meta-analysis
Kishi, T., Ikuta, T., Sakuma, K., Hatano, M., Matsuda, Y., Wilkening, J., Goya-Maldonado, R., Tik, M., Williams, N. R., Kito, S., et al. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02630-5 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Chen, J.-J., Liu, Z., Zhu, D., Li, Q., Zhang, H., Huang, H., Wei, Y., Mu, J., Yang, D., & Xie, P. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.010 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Bahraini, N. H., Breshears, R. E., Hernández, T. D., Schneider, A. L., Forster, J. E., & Brenner, L. A. (2014) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2013.11.002 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Madore, M. R., Kozel, F. A., Williams, L. M., Green, L. C., George, M. S., Holtzheimer, P. E., Yesavage, J. A., & Philip, N. S. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.025 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
One-year clinical outcomes following theta burst stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder
Petrosino, N. J., Wout‐Frank, M. V. ‘., Aiken, E., Swearingen, H. R., Barredo, J., Zandvakili, A., & Philip, N. S. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0584-4 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Philip, N. S., Ramanathan, D., Gamboa, B., Brennan, M. C., Kozel, F. A., Lazzeroni, L., & Madore, M. R. (2023) · Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.015 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Oberman, L. M., Exley, S., Philip, N. S., Siddiqi, S. H., Adamson, M. M., & Brody, D. L. (2020) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000628 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Vaithianathan, T., Blair, M., Soares, V., Rybak, Y. E., Palaniyappan, L., Richardson, J. D., & Burhan, A. M. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03729-1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Chang, C.-H., Liu, C.-Y., Chen, S.-J., & Tsai, H.-C. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1061088 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.3389/fneur.2020.565670 · DOI
- Authors
- Rubaye, S., Shah, A., Aldulaimy, W., Hernandez, A., Park, H., Sorial, V., Prasad, P., & Iyengar, S.
- Affiliations
- University of the Incarnate Word (US)
- Mendala PolyTrauma Clinic
- Corresponding author
- Rubaye, Safa
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2026-09-19
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-1788
- OpenAlex
- W7213636297
- Semantic Scholar
- ea011b479634f2b2dd57382f5dde09759dfbaf81
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- intermittent theta burst stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive disorders, mild traumatic brain injury, anxiety, perceived stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review