The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sharing the small moments: ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat
Abstract
Ephemeral social media, platforms that display shared content for a limited period of time, have become a prominent component of the social ecosystem. We draw on experience sampling data collected over two weeks (Study 1; N = 154) and in-depth interview data from a subsample of participants (Study 2; N = 28) to understand college students’ social and emotional experiences on Snapchat, a popular ephemeral mobile platform. Our quantitative data demonstrated that Snapchat interactions were perceived as more enjoyable – and associated with more positive mood – than other communication technologies. However, Snapchat interactions were also associated with lower social support than other channels. Our qualitative data highlighted aspects of Snapchat use that may facilitate positive affect (but not social support), including sharing mundane experiences with close ties and reduced self-presentational concerns. In addition, users compared Snapchat to face-to-face interaction and reported attending to Snapchat content more closely than archived content, which may contribute to increased emotional rewards. Overall, participants did not see the application as a platform for sharing or viewing photos; rather, Snapchat was viewed as a lightweight channel for sharing spontaneous experiences with trusted ties. Together, these studies contribute to our evolving understanding of ephemeral social media and their role in social relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 · Cited by 18,093
A wandering mind is an unhappy mind
Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1192439 · Cited by 2,575
Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications
(2010) · A Networked Self · doi:10.4324/9780203876527-8 · Cited by 1,724 · cited 1×
“Persistence refers to a category of temporal affordances that can influence user experiences on social platforms by prolonging the accessibility of social information (boyd, 2011; Treem & Leonardi, 2012).”
BackgroundFacebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults
Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., Shablack, H., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069841 · Cited by 1,596
Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review
Rimé, B. (2009) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073908097189 · Cited by 1,546 · cited 1×
“When individuals have more positive emotional valence (Cunningham, 1988) or higher emotional arousal (Berger, 2011), they are more likely to interact and share with others (Rime, 2009).”
BackgroundNetworked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814543995 · Cited by 954
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12078 · Cited by 916
Self-citationKok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B., Brantley, M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612470827 · Cited by 755
Arousal Increases Social Transmission of Information
Berger, J. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611413294 · Cited by 600
Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses
Eisenberger, N. I., Taylor, S. E., Gable, S. L., Hilmert, C. J., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.038 · Cited by 543
DUCK, S., RUTT, D. J., HOY, M., & STREJC, H. H. (1991) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1991.tb00545.x · Cited by 252
Smile, snap, and share? A nuanced approach to privacy and online photo-sharing
Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2014) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.10.002 · Cited by 72
Beyond Viral: Interpersonal Communication in the Internet Age
Berger, J. (2013) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2013.842203 · Cited by 54
Cited by
Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?
Khan, M. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024 · Cited by 1,180
Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305117691544 · Cited by 820
Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x · Cited by 712
“Another study indicates that adolescents perceived interactions taking place through Snapchat as less supportive than face-to-face and voice call interactions, both of which represent lower levels of cue absence and asynchronicity (Bayer et al. 2016).”
Social Media Elements, Ecologies, and Effects
Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944 · Cited by 410
Self-citationFranchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., Van Rooij, A. J., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15102319 · Cited by 411
“For teens in particular, not only frequent use, but also the use of a broad variety of social media platforms may serve the purpose of relieving anxieties with regard to not knowing what others are thinking and doing, as the differences in the relational affordances of different platforms [32] mean that they may give…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayer, J. B., Ellison, N. B., Schoenebeck, S. Y., & Falk, E. B.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-09-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 956-977
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W1847724337
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 108.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
