Cited by 150Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesImpact of Technology on AdolescentsBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Assessing the Links of Sexting, Cybervictimization, Depression, and Suicidal Ideation Among University Students

Medrano, José Luis Jasso, Lopez Rosales, Fuensanta, Gámez-Guadix, Manuel·2018·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to analyze the direct and indirect relationships among sexting, cybervictimization, depression, and suicidal ideation. The sample consisted of 303 university students from Mexico (mean age = 19.73, SD = 1.73) who completed a questionnaire about the variables of interest. The relationships among the variables were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results show that sexting was associated with being the victim of cyberbullying, which, in turn, was related to depressive symptoms. In addition, sexting, cybervictimization, and depressive symptoms were significantly associated with suicidal ideation. These results contribute to a better understanding of the relationship between online risk behaviors, such as sexting, and their possible negative consequences, such as cybervictimization, depression, and suicidal ideation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2017.1304304

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the sending of sexual content is unwanted or forced under threats of blackmail, it can lead to negative outcomes, such as greater discomfort, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation and attempts.

    “When the sending of sexual content is unwanted or forced under threats of blackmail, however, it can lead to negative outcomes, such as greater discomfort, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation and attempts (Gassó et al., 2020; Idoiaga Mondragon et al., 2020; Medrano et al., 2018; Morelli et al., 2016; Nilsson et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medrano, J. L. J., Lopez Rosales, F., & Gámez-Guadix, M.
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2017-04-07
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
153-164
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W2595708778
Cited by
150
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (511315)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spanish Government) (PSI2012-31550)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
sexting, cyber victimization, cyberbullying, depression, suicidal ideation, university students, online risk behavior, indirect effects
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Correlation of Data, Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mexico, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk-Taking, Students, Suicide, Attempted, Universities, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review