Cited by 127Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

Longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between sexting, online sexual solicitations, and cyberbullying among minors

Open access
Gámez-Guadix, Manuel, Mateos-Pérez, Estibaliz·2019·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.004

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gámez-Guadix, M., & Mateos-Pérez, E.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
94
Pages
70-76
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910292228
Cited by
124
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
sexting, online sexual solicitation, cyberbullying, minors, adolescents, cyber victimization, bidirectional relationship, longitudinal associations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review