CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 257Aging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Seattle Longitudinal Study: Relationship Between Personality and Cognition

Open access
Schaie, K. Warner, Willis, Sherry L., Caskie, Grace I.L.·2004·Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition
DOI 10.1080/13825580490511134PMC PMC1474018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article reviews the history, measures and principal findings of the Seattle Longitudinal Study. This study began in 1956 focusing upon age differences and age changes in cognitive abilities. Its sampling frame is a large HMO in the Pacific Northwest. The study has been expanded to investigate various influences on cognitive aging including, cognitive styles, personality traits, life styles, and family environment. Current interest is also in the early detection of risk for dementia. In addition, this article reports original analyses of the relation of personality dimensions to cognitive abilities (both concurrent and longitudinal). While personality remains relatively stable over the adult life span, modest proportions of variance are shared between various personality traits and the cognitive abilities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13825580490511134

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H., & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests (Rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  2. Maier, H. (1995). Health behaviors in adults: Interrelationships and correlates. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  3. Maitland, S.B. (1997). Family similarity in health behaviors. The Pennsylvania State University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  4. Maitland SB, Intrieri RC, Schaie KW, Willis SL. Gender differences in cognitive abilities: Invariance of covariance and latent mean structure. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition. 2000;7:32–53. [Google Scholar]
  5. Moos, R.H. (1986). Family Environment Scale manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  6. O’Hanlon, A.M. (1993). Inter-individual patterns of intellectual change: The influence of environmental factors. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  7. Palmore, E., Busse, E.W., Maddox, G.L., Nowlin, J.B., & Siegler, I. (1985). Normal aging III Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  8. Rott C. Three components of intellectual development in old age: Results from the Bonn Longitudinal Study of Aging. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie. 1993;26:184–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schaie, K.W. (1983). The Seattle Longitudinal Study: A twenty-one year exploration of psychometric intelligence in adulthood. In K.W. Schaie (Ed.), Longitudinal studies of adult psychological development (pp. 64–135). New York: Guilford Press.
  10. Schaie, K.W. (1985). Manual for the Schaie-Thurstone Adult Mental Abilities Test (STAMAT). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  11. Schaie, K.W. (2004). Developmental influences on cognitive development: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
  12. Schaie, K.W., & O’Hanlon, A.M. (1990). The influence of social-environmental factors in the maintenance of adult intelligence. In R. Sehmitz-Schertzer, A. Kruse, & E. Olbrich (Eds.), Altern – Ein lebenslanger Prozess der sozialen Interabion [Aging – A lifelong process of social interaction] (pp. 55–66). Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopf Verlag.
  13. Schaie, K.W., & Parham, I.A. (1975). Examiner manual for the Test of Behavioral Rigidity (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  14. Schaie, K.W., Plomin, R., Willis, S.L., Gruber-Baldini, A.L., Dutta, R., & Bayen, U. (1993). Family similarity in adult intellectual development. In J.J.F. Schroots (Ed.), Aging, health and competence: The next generation of longitudinal research (pp. 183–198). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  15. Schaie KW, Willis SL. Can intellectual decline in the elderly be reversed? Developmental Psychology. 1986;22:223–232. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schaie, K.W., & Willis, S.L. (1995). Perceived family environments across generations. In V.L. Bengtson, K.W. Schaie, & L. Burton (Eds.), Societal impact on aging: Inter-generational perspectives (pp. 174–209). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
  17. Thurstone, L.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Willis, S.L. (1989). Cohort differences in cognitive aging: A sample case. In K.W. Schaie & C. Schooler (Eds.), Social structure and aging: Psychological processes (pp. 94–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  19. Willis, S.L., & Schaie, K.W. (1986a). Practical intelligence in later adulthood. In R.J. Sternberg & R.K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical Intelligence: Origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 236–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Willis. S.L., & Schaie, K.W. (1994). Cognitive training in the normal elderly. In F. Forette, Y. Christen, & F. Boiler (Eds.), Plasticité cérébrate et stimulation cognitive [Cerebral plasticity and cognitive stimulation] (pp. 91–113). Paris: Fondation Nationale de Gérontologie.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–257 of 257

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., & Caskie, G. I. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
2-3
Pages
304-324
ISSN
  • 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1382-5585
  • 1744-4128
DOI
10.1080/13825580490511134
PMC
PMC1474018
OpenAlex
W1968471297
Cited by
257
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG008055, R37AG008055)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
Seattle Longitudinal Study, personality traits, cognitive ability, cognitive aging, age differences, personality stability, cognitive style, lifestyle, family environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review