The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computerized Neuropsychological Assessment Devices: Joint Position Paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology
Open accessAbstract
This joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology sets forth our position on appropriate standards and conventions for computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs). In this paper, we first define CNADs and distinguish them from examiner-administered neuropsychological instruments. We then set forth position statements on eight key issues relevant to the development and use of CNADs in the healthcare setting. These statements address (a) device marketing and performance claims made by developers of CNADs; (b) issues involved in appropriate end-users for administration and interpretation of CNADs; (c) technical (hardware/software/firmware) issues; (d) privacy, data security, identity verification, and testing environment; (e) psychometric development issues, especially reliability and validity; (f) cultural, experiential, and disability factors affecting examinee interaction with CNADs; (g) use of computerized testing and reporting services; and (h) the need for checks on response validity and effort in the CNAD environment. This paper is intended to provide guidance for test developers and users of CNADs that will promote accurate and appropriate use of computerized tests in a way that maximizes clinical utility and minimizes risks of misuse. The positions taken in this paper are put forth with an eye toward balancing the need to make validated CNADs accessible to otherwise underserved patients with the need to ensure that such tests are developed and utilized competently, appropriately, and with due concern for patient welfare and quality of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although the AACN and the NAN outlined appropriate standards for the development of digital assessment tools development back in 2012 (15), the field had not significantly advanced as expected for the next years (16).”
From Research on digital tool in cognitive assessment: a bibliometric analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
In the citing paper
“First, high concordance may not be guaranteed after simply converting traditional pen-and-paper tests into the digital versions (15, 16).”
From Research on digital tool in cognitive assessment: a bibliometric analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”
Ford, G. G. (2000) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781482274400-4 · Cited by 4,258
Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach.
Funk, S. G., Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290248 · Cited by 4,007
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
(2007) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n432 · Cited by 3,137
DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195503 · Cited by 2,804
Douglas, O. B., & Holland, B. F. (2015) · MacMillan Co eBooks · doi:10.1037/14910-020 · Cited by 2,283
Gaver, W. W. (1991) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Reaching through technology - CHI '91 · doi:10.1145/108844.108856 · Cited by 1,536 · cited 2×
“…system clock (McInnes & Taylor, 2001), resolution and refresh rate of the display (Gofen & Mackeben, 1997), characteristics of the user interface (Gaver, 1991), and other aspects of the operating system environment (Forster & Forster, 2003; Myors, 1999; Plant & Turner, 2009; Plant, Hammond, &…”
BackgroundHandbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment
Mitrushina, M., Boone, K. B., & D'Elia, L. F. (1999) · Cited by 1,000
Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Participants1, C. (2009) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854040903155063 · Cited by 869
Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee
BUSH, S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., REYNOLDS, C., & Silver, C. (2005) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002 · Cited by 836
Self-citationHandbook of Normative Data for Neuropsychological Assessment.
DeBernardo, C. R. (2000) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-200006000-00018 · Cited by 803
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Economidou, M. (2005) · PsyPag Quarterly · doi:10.53841/bpspag.2005.1.54.23 · Cited by 737
Lane, S. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203102961 · Cited by 730
Item Response Theory and Clinical Measurement
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553 · Cited by 722
Sweeney, J. A., Kmiec, J. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00910-0 · Cited by 460
Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants
Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Lees‐Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2001) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699050110088254 · Cited by 460
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
(2019) · The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.1002/(issn)2410-8650 · Cited by 446
Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective.
Boone, K. B. (2007) · Cited by 439
Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: a systematic review
Wild, K., Howieson, D., Webbe, F., Seelye, A., & Kaye, J. (2008) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.07.003 · Cited by 436
Neuropsychological Outcomes of Army Personnel Following Deployment to the Iraq War
Vasterling, J. J., Proctor, S. P., Amoroso, P. J., Kane, R., Heeren, T., & White, R. F. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.5.519 · Cited by 425
Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits
(2008) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0b013e31816a70cb · Cited by 352
The value added of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion
Van Kampen, D. A., Lovell, M. R., Pardini, J. E., Collins, M. W., & Fu, F. H. (2006) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546506288677 · Cited by 331
Duration of Cognitive Impairment After Sports Concussion
Bleiberg, J., Cernich, A. N., Cameron, K. L., Sun, W., Peck, K. Y., Ecklund, L. J., Reeves, C. D., Uhorchak, C. J., Sparling, M. B., & Warden, D. L. (2004) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000118820.33396.6a · Cited by 319
Self-citationTracking neuropsychological recovery following concussion in sport
Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Collins, M. W., & Lovell, M. R. (2006) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699050500487910 · Cited by 305
Self-citationBoone, K. B. (2008) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854040802427803 · Cited by 295
Matarazzo, J. D. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.9.999 · Cited by 284
The Value of Item Response Theory in Clinical Assessment: A Review
Thomas, M. L. (2010) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191110374797 · Cited by 283
Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.
Broglio, S. P., Ferrara, M. S., Macciocchi, S. N., Baumgartner, T. A., & Elliott, R. (2007) · PubMed Central · Cited by 282
No cumulative effects for one or two previous concussions: Table 1
Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Lovell, M. R., & Collins, M. W. (2005) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2005.020651 · Cited by 281
Self-citationBoard of Directors (2007) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13825580601025932 · Cited by 261
Collins, M. W., Lovell, M. R., Iverson, G. L., Ide, T., & Maroon, J. C. (2006) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000200441.92742.46 · Cited by 260
Self-citationReliability and Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment
Franzen, M. D. (2002) · Critical issues in neuropsychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3224-5 · Cited by 254
Psychological Testing on the Internet: New Problems, Old Issues.
Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M. J., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A. E., & Velasquez, R. J. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.3.150 · Cited by 246
Cognition in the days following concussion: comparison of symptomatic versus asymptomatic athletes
Collie, A. (2006) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.073155 · Cited by 195
Chamberlain, S. R., Robbins, T. W., Winder-Rhodes, S., Müller, U., Sahakian, B. J., Blackwell, A. D., & Barnett, J. H. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.019 · Cited by 178
Constantinou, M., BAUER, L., Ashendorf, L., FISHER, J., & MCCAFFREY, R. (2004) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2004.06.002 · Cited by 146
Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics sports medicine battery
Cernich, A. N., REEVES, D., SUN, W. M., & Bleiberg, J. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.008 · Cited by 131
Self-citationComputerized clinical psychological test interpretations: Unvalidated plus all mean and no sigma.
Matarazzo, J. D. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.1.14 · Cited by 129
Identifying a cognitive impairment subgroup in adults with mood disorders
Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Langenecker, S. A., & Young, A. H. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.001 · Cited by 124
Self-citationStevens, A., Friedel, E., Mehren, G., & Merten, T. (2007) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.003 · Cited by 119
Clinicians’ Guide to Neuropsychological Assessment;
KING, N. M. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00051-8 · Cited by 113
Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological assessment
Cernich, A. N., BRENNANA, D., Barker, L. H., & Bleiberg, J. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.004 · Cited by 108
Self-citationTornatore, J. B., Hill, E., Laboff, J. A., & McGann, M. E. (2005) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/jnp.17.1.98 · Cited by 106
Marx, B. P., Brailey, K., Proctor, S. P., MacDonald, H. Z., Graefe, A. C., Amoroso, P. J., Heeren, T., & Vasterling, J. J. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.109 · Cited by 99
Computerized Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: comparison with manual administration.
Tien, A. Y., Spevack, T. V., Jones, D. W., Pearlson, G. D., Schlaepfer, T. E., & Strauss, M. E. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 96
Brooks, B. L., Iverson, G. L., Sherman, E. M. S., & Roberge, M.-C. (2010) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09084280903526083 · Cited by 96
Self-citationPlant, R. R., & Turner, G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.3.598 · Cited by 96
Does familiarity with computers affect computerized neuropsychological test performance?
Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Ashton, V. L., Johnson, L. G., & Gualtieri, C. T. (2008) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390802372125 · Cited by 95
Self-citationNewman, T. B., & Kohn, M. A. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511759512 · Cited by 95
Neurocognitive testing supports a broader concept of mild cognitive impairment
Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2005) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/153331750502000607 · Cited by 88
A Comparison of Computerized and Standard Versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
Feldstein, S. N., Keller, F. R., Portman, R. E., Durham, R. L., Klebe, K. J., & Davis, H. P. (1999) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.13.3.303.1744 · Cited by 86
Doniger, G. M., Dwolatzky, T., Zucker, D. M., Chertkow, H. M., Crystal, H., Schweiger, A., & Simon, E. S. (2006) · American Journal of Alzheimer s Disease & Other Dementias® · doi:10.1177/153331750602100105 · Cited by 77
Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why?
Plant, R. R., Hammond, Ν. G. L., & Turner, G. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195575 · Cited by 74
Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological and Neurobehavioral Tests Self-Administered by Computer
Campbell, K. A., Rohlman, D. S., Storzbach, D. M., Binder, L. M., Anger, W. K., Kovera, C. A., Davis, K. L., & Grossmann, S. J. (1999) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/107319119900600103 · Cited by 72
Self-citation(2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.9.993 · Cited by 72
A computerized test battery sensitive to mild and severe brain injury.
Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2008) · PubMed Central · Cited by 70
Validity of the Mindstreams Computerized Cognitive Battery for Mild Cognitive Impairment
Dwolatzky, T., Whitehead, V., Doniger, G. M., Simon, E. S., Schweiger, A., Jaffe, D. H., & Chertkow, H. M. (2008) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s12031-007-9031-9 · Cited by 68
West, L. K., Curtis, K. L., Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2010) · Journal of Neuropsychology · doi:10.1348/174866410x521434 · Cited by 60
Raymond, P. D., Hinton-Bayre, A. D., Radel, M., Ray, M. J., & Marsh, N. A. (2005) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.10.016 · Cited by 57
Doniger, G. M., Zucker, D. M., Schweiger, A., Dwolatzky, T., Chertkow, H. M., Crystal, H., & Simon, E. S. (2005) · Current Alzheimer Research · doi:10.2174/1567205053585792 · Cited by 56
Validity of the Mindstreams™ Computerized Cognitive Battery for Mild Cognitive Impairment
Dwolatzky, T., Whitehead, V., Doniger, G. M., Simon, E. S., Schweiger, A., Jaffe, D. H., & Chertkow, H. M. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.1385/jmn:24:1:033 · Cited by 56
Efficient Allocation of Attentional Resources in Patients With ADHD
Gualtieri, C. T., & Johnson, L. G. (2006) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054705283758 · Cited by 54
Sweet, J. J., KING, J. H., Malina, A. C., Bergman, M. A., & Simmons, A. N. (2002) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.16.4.481.13914 · Cited by 53
Timing accuracy of PC programs running under DOS and Windows
Myors, B. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207727 · Cited by 48
Neurobehavioral deficits in Persian Gulf veterans: Evidence from a population-based study
Anger, W. K., Storzbach, D. M., Binder, L. M., Campbell, K. A., Rohlman, D. S., McCauley, L., Kovera, C. A., & Davis, K. L. (1999) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617799533031 · Cited by 48
Self-citationAn Evaluation of the Effects of Methylphenidate on Outcomes in Adult Epilepsy Patients
Moore, J. L., McAuley, J. W., Long, L., & Bornstein, R. A. (2002) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1006/ebeh.2001.0313 · Cited by 45
Norms for an abbreviated Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices in an older sample
Smits, C. H. M., Smit, J. H., van den Heuvel, N., & Jonker, C. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199711)53:7 · Cited by 43
Matarazzo, J. D. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.45.9.999 · Cited by 43
Clinical psychological test interpretations by computer: Hardware outpaces software
Matarazzo, J. D. (1985) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/0747-5632(85)90015-9 · Cited by 43
Reliability and Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment
Horton, A. M., & Benedict, R. H. B. (1992) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/7.6.561 · Cited by 41
Neurocognitive Function of Emergency Department Patients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Peterson, S. E., Stull, M. J., Collins, M. W., & Wang, H. E. (2009) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.10.015 · Cited by 39
Reaction time assessment in children with ADHD
Bolfer, C. P. M., Casella, E. B., Baldo, M. V. C., Mota, A. M., Tsunemi, M. H., Pacheco, S. P., & Reed, U. C. (2010) · Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/s0004-282x2010000200025 · Cited by 37
Administering the category test by computer: Equivalence of results
Choca, J. P., & Morris, J. (1992) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854049208404112 · Cited by 36
Millisecond timing on PCs and Macs
MacInnes, W. J., & Taylor, T. L. (2001) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03195363 · Cited by 36
Slick, D. J., Tan, J. E., Strauss, E., Mateer, C. A., Harnadek, M. C. S., & Sherman, E. M. S. (2003) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.17.3.390.18090 · Cited by 34
Adaptive cognitive testing in dementia
Wouters, H., Zwinderman, A. H., van Gool, W. A., Schmand, B. A., & Lindeboom, R. (2009) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.283 · Cited by 33
DORION, A. A. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00150-6 · Cited by 28
Computer-Based Cognitive Testing
Crook, T. H., Kay, G. G., & Larrabee, G. J. (2008) · Cited by 26
McKinney, C., MacCormac, E. R., & Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207703 · Cited by 24
The Relation Between ADHD Symptoms and Fine Motor Control: A Genetic Study
Polderman, T. J. C., van Dongen, J., & Boomsma, D. I. (2010) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2010.518142 · Cited by 22
Micromanaging time: Measuring and controlling timing errors in computer-controlled experiments
Creeger, C. P., Miller, K. F., & Paredes, D. R. (1990) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03203120 · Cited by 21
Response to Fowler and Butcher on Matarazzo.
Matarazzo, J. D. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.1.96.a · Cited by 14
Adaptive Cognitive Testing in Cerebrovascular Disease and Vascular Dementia
Wouters, H., de Koning, I., Zwinderman, A. H., van Gool, W. A., Schmand, B. A., Buiter, M., & Lindeboom, R. (2009) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000250593 · Cited by 13
An introduction to accurate display timing for PCs under 'Windows'
Gofen, A., & MacKeben, M. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00285 · Cited by 10
Clinical Procedures for the Neuropsychological Evaluation of U.S. Air Force Pilots
Retzlaff, P. D., Callister, J. D., & King, R. E. (1999) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/164.7.514 · Cited by 9
Computer Access for People After Stroke
Hitchcock, E. (2006) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/0hwa-djn8-jupc-get1 · Cited by 8
On the question of professional standards for computer-based test interpetation.
Kramer, J. J. (1987) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.42.9.889.b · Cited by 5
McLay, R. N., Spira, J. L., & Reeves, D. (2010) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-09-00237 · Cited by 5
Environmental medicine for all: getting there from here
Ozonoff, D. M. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92706-9 · Cited by 4
On the question of professional standards for computer-based test interpretation.
Kramer, J. J. (1987) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.42.9.889.b · Cited by 4
(1997) · PubMed
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 1986, Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations
- Bleiberg J, 1997, Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 10, 247
- Broglio SP, 2007, Journal of Athletic Training, 42, 509
- Cronbach LJ, 1971, Educational measurement,, 443
- Crook TH, 2009, Neuropsychological Asessment of Neuropsychiatric and Neuromedical Disorders,, 84
- Gaver WW, 1991, In CHI 1991 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching through Technology
- 10.1080/02699050110088254 · DOI
- Gualtieri CT, 2008, Medscape Journal of Medicine, 10, 90
- 10.1080/13854040903155063 · DOI · Paper page
- McInnes WJ, 2001, Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 31, 129
- Nunnally JC, 1994, Psychometric theory,
- 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17.1.98 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parsons, T. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00660 · Cited by 837
Neuropsychological Assessment: Past and Future
Casaletto, K. B., & Heaton, R. K. (2017) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617717001060 · Cited by 270
Roebuck‐Spencer, T., Glen, T., Puente, A. E., Denney, R. L., Ruff, R. M., Hostetter, G., & Bianchini, K. J. (2017) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acx021 · Cited by 230
Self-citationApplications of Technology in Neuropsychological Assessment
Parsey, C. M., & Schmitter‐Edgecombe, M. (2013) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.834971 · Cited by 206
Lin, N., Wefel, J. S., Lee, E. Q., Schiff, D., van den Bent, M. J., Soffietti, R., Suh, J. H., Vogelbaum, M. A., Mehta, M. P., Dancey, J. E., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70308-5 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, R. M., Iverson, G. L., Cernich, A. N., Binder, L. M., Ruff, R. M., & Naugle, R. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- VA Maryland Health Care System (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- National Academy of Neuropsychology (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bauer, Russell M.
- Venue
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-196
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- 1385-4046
- 1744-4144
- PMC
- PMC3847815
- OpenAlex
- W2123523173
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR029890)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- computerized neuropsychological assessment, psychometric validation, reliability and validity, response validity, effort monitoring, data security and privacy, identity verification, underserved patients, clinical utility, test misuse
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Computers, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
