Cited by 124Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Identifying a cognitive impairment subgroup in adults with mood disorders

Open access
Iverson, Grant L., Brooks, Brian L., Langenecker, Scott A., Young, Allan H.·2011·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background We hypothesized that only a minority of patients with mood disorders have measurable cognitive impairment, and this minority drives the small-to-medium effect sizes detected in group studies. Removal of this minority from group statistical analyses will illustrate that the majority appear to have broadly normal cognitive functioning.Methods Participants were adults between the ages of 20 and 54, including 659 healthy control subjects, 84 unmedicated outpatients diagnosed with depression, 59 outpatients diagnosed with depression who were on medications at the time of the evaluation, and 43 outpatients with bipolar disorder. All completed the CNS Vital Signs computerized cognitive screening battery.Results The prevalence rates of low cognitive test scores were calculated for the healthy control subjects and the patients with mood disorders. Having two scores at or below the 5th percentile occurred in 31.2% of the patients and only 8.2% of the control subjects [χ(2)(1)=66.67, p<.0001; Odds Ratio=5.1, 95% CI=3.4-7.7]. For the control subjects, this low false positive rate for cognitive impairment was maintained across age groups, sexes, and education levels. A larger proportion of patients with bipolar disorder (41.9%) than patients with depression (27.1-28.6%) met this criterion for cognitive impairment.Conclusions This study suggests that cognitive impairment associated with mood disorders is limited to a minority of patients with the majority being broadly cognitively normal. Future research should determine if this identified subgroup has neuroanatomical, neurophysiological, or neuroendocrine abnormalities. Cognitive screening tools of this type might be useful in selecting participants for studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iverson, G. L., Brooks, B. L., Langenecker, S. A., & Young, A. H.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Iverson, Grant L.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
132
Issue
3
Pages
360-367
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124583514
Cited by
124
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH074459, MH074459)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
cognitive impairment, mood disorders, depression, bipolar disorder, cognitive screening, CNS Vital Signs, prevalence of cognitive impairment, subgroup analysis, medication effects on cognition, participant selection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review