The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Category test and trail making test as measures of frontal lobe functions
Abstract
A brief review of the literature reveals that many psychologists believe that certain tests measure frontal lobe deficits. However, recent carefully controlled studies suggest that neuropsychological deficits are far from specific for frontal versus nonfrontal lesions. In this study, we compared groups with frontal and nonfrontal cerebral lesions that were approximately equivalent for types of lesions and other variables. No intergroup differences were found on the Category Test and Part B of the Trail Making Test. The results suggest that neuropsychologists should adopt a more critical attitude concerning so-called “frontal lobe deficits.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A normative‐developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649109540483 · Cited by 1,313
Cited by
Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test
Bowie, C. R., & Harvey, P. D. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.390 · Cited by 1,418
Executive Functioning as a Potential Mediator of Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Normal Adults.
Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566 · Cited by 1,057
Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes
Stuss, D. T., & Levine, B. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135220 · Cited by 992
A preliminary profile of neuropsychological deficits associated with major depression
Veiel, H. O. F. (1997) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639708403745 · Cited by 502
Executive Functioning: Overview, Assessment, and Research Issues for Non-Neuropsychologists
Suchy, Y. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9097-4 · Cited by 408
Cotrena, C., Branco, L. D., Shansis, F. M., & Fonseca, R. P. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.007 · Cited by 227
The assessment of executive functions: coming out of the office
Manchester, D., Priestley, N., & Jackson, H. (2004) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699050410001672387 · Cited by 219
Wegmann, E., Müller, S. M., Turel, O., & Brand, M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60819-4 · Cited by 145
Anderson, C. V., Bigler, E. D., & Blatter, D. D. (1995) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688639508402438 · Cited by 136
Vasavada, M. M., Leaver, A. M., Njau, S., Joshi, S. H., Ercoli, L., Hellemann, G., Narr, K. L., & Espinoza, R. (2017) · The Journal of ECT · doi:10.1097/yct.0000000000000426 · Cited by 73
Kumral, D., Schaare, H. L., Beyer, F., Reinelt, J., Uhlig, M., Liem, F., Lampe, L., Babayan, A., Reiter, A., Erbey, M., et al. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.027 · Cited by 64
Canale, N., Vieno, A., Doro, M., Rosa Mineo, E., Marino, C., & Billieux, J. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54911-7 · Cited by 50
Attentional control in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.
Coubard, O. A., Ferrufino, L., Boura, M., Gripon, A., Renaud, M., & Bherer, L. (2011) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0022058 · Cited by 48
Velupillai, Y. N., Packard, C. J., Batty, G. D., Bezlyak, V., Burns, H., Cavanagh, J., Deans, K., Ford, I., McGinty, A., Millar, K., et al. (2008) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-126 · Cited by 36
Guzman-Martinez, L., Farías, G. A., Tapia, J. P., Sánchez, M. P., Fuentes, P., Gloger, S., & Maccioni, R. B. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-201501 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D.
- Venue
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 50-56
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- 1385-4046
- 1744-4144
- OpenAlex
- W2047691153
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
