The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drinking male tears: language, the manosphere, and networked harassment
Open accessAbstract
While popular discourse often frames online harassment as an issue of individuals engaged in abhorrent behavior, harassing behavior is often networked in that it is coordinated and organized. When feminists and female public figures experience harassment, it often originates from members of a loose online network known as the manosphere, a set of blogs, podcasts, and forums comprised of pickup artists, men’s rights activists, anti-feminists, and fringe groups. While the particular beliefs of these groups may differ, many participants have adopted a common language. This paper explores the discourse of the manosphere and its links to online misogyny and harassment. Using critical discourse analysis, we examine the term misandry, which originates in the manosphere; trace its infiltration into more mainstream circles; and analyze its ideological and community-building functions. We pay particular attention to how this vocabulary reinforces a misogynistic ontology which paints feminism as a man-hating movement which victimizes men and boys.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response to the rise of the feminist movement, several misogynist and anti-feminist groups have emerged (Jaki et al., 2019; Marwick & Caplan, 2018).”
From Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence, Hate Speech, and Terrorism: A Risk Assessment on the Rise of the Incel Rebellion in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as Marwick & Caplan, 2018
In the citing paper
“Incels’ distortion of science occurs in the broader context of misinformation and disinformation, wherein communities misuse or manufacture research findings to support an ideological agenda (Marwick & Caplan, 2018).”
From Stochastic Gender-Based Violence: How Incels Justify and Encourage Sexualized Violence Against Women (2025) · cites this paper as Marwick & Caplan, 2018
In the citing paper
“For instance, several misogynist platforms employ 'misandry' as a buzzword to accuse feminists of discriminating against men, in discourses whose circulation drastically increased because of the networking potential of social media.”
From “Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere (2023) · cites this paper as Alice E. Marwick and Robyn Caplan 2018
In the citing paper
“Drawing from the framework of online misogyny, (Alice E. Marwick and Robyn Caplan 2018) explain how the manosphere is networked in spreading ideologies that criminalize women and feminism.”
From “Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere (2023) · cites this paper as Alice E. Marwick and Robyn Caplan 2018
In the citing paper
“Similar to other manosphere communities (e.g., Gotell & Dutton, 2016; Marwick & Caplan, 2018; Van Valkenburgh, 2021), incels are hostile toward both feminism and women's agency.”
From Stochastic Gender-Based Violence: How Incels Justify and Encourage Sexualized Violence Against Women (2025) · cites this paper as Marwick & Caplan, 2018
In the citing paper
“Research on networked misogyny and TFSV has demonstrated that online harassment and stalking has tangible impacts on women's lives (Marwick & Caplan, 2018; Veletsianos et al., 2018).”
From Stochastic Gender-Based Violence: How Incels Justify and Encourage Sexualized Violence Against Women (2025) · cites this paper as Marwick & Caplan, 2018
In the citing paper
“The MRM is a backlash movement initiated by men in response to the rise of feminism and the changing role of women (Marwick & Caplan, 2018).”
From Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence, Hate Speech, and Terrorism: A Risk Assessment on the Rise of the Incel Rebellion in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as Marwick & Caplan, 2018
Citations
Cites
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,525
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis
Boyle, C., & Barker, A. (2006) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2006.1.2.36 · Cited by 11,844
Fairclough, N. L. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203697078 · Cited by 10,756
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Brodsky, C. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71872-7 · Cited by 6,728
This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept
Star, S. L. (2010) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243910377624 · Cited by 2,621
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,566
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis
Cross, R. (2011) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2011.1.11.32 · Cited by 2,375
Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women
Unger, R. K. (1992) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/036168439201600304 · Cited by 1,506
Massanari, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815608807 · Cited by 1,264
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Barton Alana, 2014, Violence and Harassment against Women in the News Media: A Global Picture
- Bradshaw, S. , and Philip N. Howard . 2017.Troops, Trolls and Troublemakers: A Global Inventory of Organized Social Media Manipulation. Working Paper 2017.12. Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda.
- Cameron Deborah, 1998, The Feminist Critique of Language, 1
- Coston Bethany M., 2012, Nev. LJ, 13, 368
- Fairbairn Jordan, 2015, EGirls, ECitizens, 229
- Franks Mary Anne, 2012, Maryland Law Review, 71
- Lilly Mary, 2016, Master’s thesis, Political Science
- Lyons Matthew N., 2017, Ctrl-Alt-Delete: The Origins and Ideology of the Alternative Right
- 10.2307/23719068 · DOI
- Michael George, 2017, Skeptic, 22, 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mob Censorship: Online Harassment of US Journalists in Times of Digital Hate and Populism
Waisbord, S. (2020) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1818111 · Cited by 310
Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit
Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science · doi:10.1145/3292522.3326045 · Cited by 265
Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere
Van Valkenburgh, S. P. (2021) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x18816118 · Cited by 263
Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment
Jones, C. D., Trott, V. A., & Wright, S. (2019) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819887141 · Cited by 206
Morally Motivated Networked Harassment as Normative Reinforcement
Marwick, A. E. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211021378 · Cited by 185
Self-citationJungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108297820 · Cited by 227
#MeToo: Disclosure and Response to Sexual Victimization on Twitter
Bogen, K. W., Bleiweiss, K., Leach, N. R., & Orchowski, L. M. (2019) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260519851211 · Cited by 156
Chang, W. (2022) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1804976 · Cited by 142
Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit
Chandrasekharan, E., Jhaver, S., Bruckman, A., & Gilbert, E. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3490499 · Cited by 129
Haslop, C., Ringrose, J., Cambazoglu, I., & Milne, B. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241228811 · Cited by 144
“Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere
Dickel, V., & Evolvi, G. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2029925 · Cited by 122
Young, A., Selander, L., & Vaast, E. (2019) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100257 · Cited by 121
Incel (E)motives: Resentment, Shame and Revenge
Cottee, S. (2020) · Studies in Conflict and Terrorism · doi:10.1080/1057610x.2020.1822589 · Cited by 114
Weaponized Subordination: How Incels Discredit Themselves to Degrade Women
Halpin, M. (2022) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/08912432221128545 · Cited by 110
Tranchese, A., & Sugiura, L. (2021) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801221996453 · Cited by 107
‘The pussy ain’t worth it, bro’: assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW
Wright, S., Trott, V., & Jones, C. (2020) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1751867 · Cited by 98
Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok
Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2023) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5 · Cited by 105
“Online antifeminist men’s groups enabled by technologisation have risen in response to and against contemporary feminist advancements, contributing to the growth in online hate and activities promoting gender-based violence (GBV) against women (Marwick & Caplan, 2018).”
BackgroundThe Black Pill: New Technology and the Male Supremacy of Involuntarily Celibate Men
Preston, K., Halpin, M., & Maguire, F. (2021) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x211017954 · Cited by 109
Mapping the manosphere. Categorization of reactionary masculinity discourses in digital environment
Han, X., & Yin, C. (2022) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1998185 · Cited by 113
Botto, M., & Gottzén, L. (2023) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2023.2260318 · Cited by 76
Confronting Incel: exploring possible policy responses to misogynistic violent extremism
Tomkinson, S., Harper, T., & Attwell, K. (2020) · Australian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1080/10361146.2020.1747393 · Cited by 73
“We Dissect Stupidity and Respond to It”: Response Videos and Networked Harassment on YouTube
Lewis, R. A., Marwick, A. E., & Partin, W. C. (2021) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764221989781 · Cited by 73
Self-citationExamining Incel Subculture on Reddit
Helm, B., Scrivens, R., Holt, T. J., Chermak, S., & Frank, R. (2024) · Journal of Crime and Justice · doi:10.1080/0735648x.2022.2074867 · Cited by 65
Women's Perspectives on Harm and Justice after Online Harassment
Im, J., Schoenebeck, S. Y., Iriarte, M. P., Grill, G., Wilkinson, D., Batool, A., Alharbi, R., Funwie, A., Gankhuu, T., Gilbert, É., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555775 · Cited by 75
LaViolette, J., & Hogan, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3357 · Cited by 57
Knüpfer, C. B., Hoffmann, M., & Voskresenskii, V. (2020) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1822904 · Cited by 57
Men who hate women: The misogyny of involuntarily celibate men
Halpin, M., Richard, N., Preston, K., Gosse, M., & Maguire, F. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231176777 · Cited by 59
The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit
Krendel, A., McGlashan, M., & Koller, V. (2022) · Corpora · doi:10.3366/cor.2022.0257 · Cited by 54
Neologising misogyny: Urban Dictionary’s folksonomies of sexual abuse
Ging, D., Lynn, T., & Rosati, P. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819870306 · Cited by 52
Language and Masculinities: History, Development, and Future
Lawson, R. (2020) · Annual Review of Linguistics · doi:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011650 · Cited by 55
Decentralizing Platform Power: A Design Space of Multi-Level Governance in Online Social Platforms
Jhaver, S., Frey, S., & Zhang, A. X. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231207857 · Cited by 90
Deplatforming the Far-right: An Analysis of YouTube and BitChutePreprint
Rauchfleisch, A., & Kaiser, J. (2021) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3867818 · Cited by 59
Mapping the Neo-Manosphere(s): New Directions for Research
Gerrand, V., Ging, D., Roose, J. M., & Flood, M. (2025) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x251350277 · Cited by 66
Sundén, J., & Paasonen, S. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12500.001.0001 · Cited by 49
The Battle for “NoFap”: Myths, Masculinity, and the Meaning of Masturbation Abstention
Burnett, S. (2021) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x211018256 · Cited by 50
Wounded men of feminism: Exploring regimes of male victimhood in the Spanish manosphere
Mingo, E. G., & Díaz‐Fernández, S. (2022) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13675494221140586 · Cited by 47
Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy
Jungherr, A. M., Rivero, G., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2020) · Cited by 48
Rothermel, A.-K. (2020) · Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society · doi:10.1093/sp/jxaa024 · Cited by 61
Prażmo, E. M. (2020) · Topics in Linguistics · doi:10.2478/topling-2020-0007 · Cited by 59
Meisner, C. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231179696 · Cited by 56
Hopton, K., & Langer, S. (2021) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535211033461 · Cited by 63
Valkenburgh, S. P. V. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119872953 · Cited by 51
The incel phenomenon: A systematic scoping review
Aiolfi, I., Palena, N., Ciardha, C. Ó., & Caso, L. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06236-6 · Cited by 43
Hanson, K. R., & Bolthouse, H. (2024) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231241259627 · Cited by 42
“For example, although some subreddits advance a framework suggesting that straight men are a disadvantaged group, those same subred-dits draw on individualistic logic for drafting solutions to group inequalities (Hanson et al. 2023; Marwick and Caplan 2018).”
InfluentialBarnes, M. J., & Karim, S. (2025) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/00104140241312095 · Cited by 52
Rubin, J. D., Blackwell, L., & Conley, T. D. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376645 · Cited by 42
Ophir, Y., Pruden, M. L., Walter, D., Lokmanoglu, A. D., Tebaldi, C., & Wang, R. (2022) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2022.2077654 · Cited by 41
Habib, H., Srinivasan, P., & Nithyanand, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555551 · Cited by 68
Carian, E. K., DiBranco, A., & Ebin, C. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9781003164722 · Cited by 38
Making feminist claims in the post-truth era: the authority of personal experience
Budgeon, S. (2021) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700120988638 · Cited by 42
The totalizing meritocracy of heterosex: Subjectivity in NoFap
Hartmann, M. (2020) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/1363460720932387 · Cited by 44
Margins as Methods, Margins as Ethics: A Feminist Framework for Studying Online Alterity
Clark, R., & Lingel, J. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120913994 · Cited by 37
Language and Mediated Masculinities
Lawson, R. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081041.001.0001 · Cited by 37
Faith, B. (2022) · Gender Technology and Development · doi:10.1080/09718524.2022.2124600 · Cited by 46
di Carlo, G. S. (2022) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/09579265221099380 · Cited by 53
Jones, C. (2023) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437231159555 · Cited by 48
Fontanella, L., Chulvi, B., Ignazzi, E., Sarra, A., & Tontodimamma, A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02978-7 · Cited by 34
On the use of Jargon and Word Embeddings to Explore Subculture within the Reddit’s Manosphere
Farrell, T., Araque, Ó., Fernández, M., & Alani, H. (2020) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3394231.3397912 · Cited by 39
Eddington, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2019.1706099 · Cited by 33
Russo, G., Verginer, L., Horta Ribeiro, M., & Casiraghi, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22184 · Cited by 32
When Help Is Harm: Health, Lookism and Self‐Improvement in the Manosphere
Halpin, M., Gosse, M., Yeo, K., Handlovsky, I., & Maguire, F. (2025) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.70015 · Cited by 44
Social media and hyper‐masculine work cultures
Maaranen, A., & Tienari, J. (2020) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12450 · Cited by 37
Women Scientists on TikTok: New Opportunities to Become Visible and Challenge Gender Stereotypes
Huber, B., & Baena, L. Q. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i1.6070 · Cited by 32
Living Through It: Anger, Laughter, and Internet Memes in Dark Times
Griffin, H. (2020) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367877920965990 · Cited by 32
Just, S. N. (2019) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508419842710 · Cited by 31
Vaast, E. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840619894923 · Cited by 31
Grill, G. (2021) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-021-09409-0 · Cited by 31
Fowler, K. (2021) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2021.1985387 · Cited by 45
Of Victims, Mass Murder, and “Real Men”
Rothermel, A.-K., Kelly, M., & Jasser, G. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003164722-9 · Cited by 31
Green, R., Fowler, K., & Palombi, A. (2023) · Sexualities · doi:10.1177/13634607231169509 · Cited by 33
Landwhales, femoids and sub-humans
Bogetić, K., Heritage, F., Koller, V., & McGlashan, M. (2023) · Metaphor and the Social World · doi:10.1075/msw.23005.bog · Cited by 27
Díaz‐Fernández, S., & García‐Mingo, E. (2022) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221135631 · Cited by 27
Mattheis, A. A., & Kingdon, A. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_23 · Cited by 26
Alichie, B. O. (2022) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2032253 · Cited by 26
From offline to online violence: new challenges for the contemporary society
Donato, S., Eslen‐Ziya, H., & Мангоне, Э. (2022) · International Review of Sociology · doi:10.1080/03906701.2022.2133405 · Cited by 26
Zoombombing During A Global Pandemic
Elmer, G., Neville, S. J., Burton, A., & Ward-Kimola, S. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211035356 · Cited by 26
Lumsden, K. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_4 · Cited by 26
How to Conduct Discovery Using Open Source Methods
Myers, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780198836063.003.0007 · Cited by 24
(2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/law/9780198836063.001.0001 · Cited by 24
The Rise of Online Counterpublics? : The Limits of Inclusion in a Digital Age
Holm, M. (2019) · Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) · Cited by 24
Chan, E. (2023) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012221125495 · Cited by 36
“In response to the rise of the feminist movement, several misogynist and anti-feminist groups have emerged (Jaki et al., 2019; Marwick & Caplan, 2018).”
BackgroundMisogyny and the construction of toxic masculinity in the Spanish Manosphere (Burbuja.info)
Lacalle, C., Gómez-Morales, B., & Vicent-Ibáñez, M. (2023) · El Profesional de la información · doi:10.3145/epi.2023.mar.15 · Cited by 25
Bogen, K. W., Haikalis, M., Lopez, R. J. M., López, G., & Orchowski, L. M. (2020) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520922365 · Cited by 25
Failure to thrive: incels, boys and feminism
Sharkey, G. (2021) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2021.1958160 · Cited by 39
The new feminist frontier on community-based learning
Simões, R. B., Amaral, I., & Santos, S. J. (2021) · European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults · doi:10.3384/rela.2000-7426.3359 · Cited by 23
Communicating misogyny: An interdisciplinary research agenda for social psychology
Tileagă, C. (2019) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12491 · Cited by 22
Venäläinen, S. (2021) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13675494211021097 · Cited by 40
Dafaure, M. (2022) · European Journal of English Studies · doi:10.1080/13825577.2022.2091299 · Cited by 22
Lavorgna, A., & Sugiura, L. (2020) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1855719 · Cited by 22
Stochastic Gender-Based Violence: How Incels Justify and Encourage Sexualized Violence Against Women
Gosse, M., Halpin, M., & Maguire, F. (2025) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012241279816 · Cited by 22
“Incels ’ distortion of science occurs in the broader context of misinformation and disinformation, wherein communities misuse or manufacture research fi ndings to support an ideological agenda (Marwick & Caplan, 2018).”
InfluentialWescott, S., & Roberts, S. (2024) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2024.2409267 · Cited by 21
Race and the language of incels
Bogetić, K. (2022) · English Today · doi:10.1017/s0266078422000153 · Cited by 21
Women’s football subculture of misogyny: the escalation to online gender-based violence
Fenton, A., Ahmed, W., Hardey, M., Boardman, R., & Kavanagh, E. J. (2023) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2023.2270566 · Cited by 26
Meisner, C. (2023) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.359 · Cited by 28
Journalists' Ideological Branding: Bridging Professional and Personal Branding on Twitter
Kedem, A., & Neiger, M. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1080/17512786.2024.2313141 · Cited by 22
Young users of social media: an analysis from a gender perspective
Aran-Ramspott, S., Korres, O., Albizuri, I. E., Inchaurtieta, Á. M., & Bergillos, I. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375983 · Cited by 32
Lamarche, V. M., & Seery, M. D. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.060 · Cited by 20
‘Smash the patriarchy’: the changing meanings and work of ‘patriarchy’ online
Hill, R. L., & Allen, K. (2021) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700120988643 · Cited by 29
Bright, J., Marchal, N., Ganesh, B., & Rudinac, S. (2021) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqab020 · Cited by 41
Transnationalising the Anti-public Sphere: Australian Anti-publics and Reactionary Online Media
Davis, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8351-9_6 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Data & Society Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marwick, Alice E.
- Venue
- Feminist Media Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-26
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 543-559
- ISSN
- 1468-0777 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5902
- OpenAlex
- W2789889202
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 63.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Feminist Media Studies (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- manosphere, online harassment, misandry, online misogyny, men's rights activism, anti-feminism, feminist discourse, misogyny, community building, language and ideology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
