The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design
Open accessAbstract
Negative emissions technologies (NETs), especially bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and direct air capture and storage, have been invoked as necessary to achieve the aspirational 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement. However, currently their costs are estimated to be very high, NETs do not seem to offer co-benefits besides mitigating climate change and there are significant concerns regarding possible negative impacts of their large-scale implementation on sustainable development. Costs can vary significantly due to locational factors such as availability of biomass resources and geological storage capacity. It will be up to progressive industrialized countries to take first steps to mobilize the mitigation potential of NETs.In order to understand whether NETs can provide a significant contribution to mitigation, financial incentives are needed that allow implementing the most attractive NET activities at the global scale. We see the market mechanism under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement – colloquially called ‘Sustainable Development Mechanism’ – as a possible cornerstone of such a policy instrument. While initially NETs will not be competitive on the free market, the mechanism can facilitate bilateral financial transfers for NETs, where mitigation units accrue to the financier. We discuss the functions and design elements that an international policy instrument may need to fulfil to successfully mobilize NETs. This includes in particular robust quantification of removed carbon under international oversight and preventing social and environmental conflicts particularly on land and water use by NETs to ensure long-term acceptability.Key policy insights International policy instruments that mobilize negative emissions technologies are inexistent despite most mitigation pathways relying on large-scale NETs implementation later this century.Feasibility of NETs at large-scale is highly uncertain due to high expected costs and political economy challenges. Practical experience is necessary for better understanding feasibility.For cost-effective global deployment of NETs, a policy instrument would need to mobilize international financial flows and implement safeguards concerning sustainable development impacts.The sustainable development mechanism established in Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement could be a good basis for this if it includes a robust approach to evaluating sustainable development impacts building on the sustainable development goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of these constraints, the bioenergy supply is probably most significant.56”
From The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316577226.067 · Cited by 4,372
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1053 · Cited by 2,680
Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/534320a · Cited by 2,114
Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change
Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., & Sokona, Y. (2014) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 1,637
Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma
Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., Pacala, S., Reilly, J., Searchinger, T., Somerville, C., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177970 · Cited by 1,596
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
Smith, P., Davis, S. J., Creutzig, F., Fuss, S., Minx, J., Gabrielle, B., Kato, E., Jackson, R. B., Cowie, A., Kriegler, E., et al. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2870 · Cited by 1,440
The trouble with negative emissions
Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4567 · Cited by 1,252
Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals
Nerini, F. F., Tomei, J., To, L. S., Bisaga, I., Parikh, P., Black, M. J., Borrion, A. L., Spataru, C., Broto, V. C., Anandarajah, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 · Cited by 1,174
Quéré, C. L., Andrew, R. M., Canadell, J. G., Sitch, S. A., Korsbakken, J. I., Peters, G. P., Manning, A. C., Boden, T. A., Tans, P. P., Houghton, R. A., et al. (2016) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-8-605-2016 · Cited by 1,101
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Boysen, L. (2017). Potentials, consequences and trade-offs of terrestrial carbon dioxide removal (Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät).
- Horton, J. B., Keith, D. W. & Honegger, M. (2016). Implications of the Paris Agreement for carbon dioxide removal and solar geoengineering. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements Viewpoints Series, Cambridge, MA.
- Kossoy A., 2015, State and trends of carbon pricing
- National Research Council (NRC), 2015, Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool earth
- UNFCCC. (2015). Decision 1/CP.21 Adoption of the Paris Agreement. In Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015, Addendum Part two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first session, FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges
Erans, M., Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Hanak, D. P., Clulow, Z., Reiner, D. M., & Mutch, G. A. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee03523a · Cited by 688
Self-citationThe threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels.
Johnsson, F., Kjärstad, J., & Rootzén, J. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1483885 · Cited by 543
An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways
Realmonte, G., Drouet, L., Gambhir, A., Glynn, J. D. M., Hawkes, A. D., Köberle, A. C., & Tavoni, M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5 · Cited by 548
Recent advances in direct air capture by adsorption
Zhu, X., Xie, W., Wu, J., Miao, Y., Xiang, C., Chen, C., Ge, B., Gan, Z., Yang, F., Zhang, M., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00970b · Cited by 468
Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals
Lawrence, M. G., Schäfer, S., Muri, H., Scott, V., Oschlies, A., Vaughan, N. E., Boucher, O., Schmidt, H., Haywood, J., & Scheffran, J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3 · Cited by 305
Energy systems in scenarios at net-zero CO2 emissions
DeAngelo, J., Azevedo, I. L., Bistline, J. E. T., Clarke, L., Luderer, G., Byers, E. A., & Davis, S. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26356-y · Cited by 300
Energy systems for climate change mitigation: A systematic review
Kang, J.-N., Wei, Y., Liu, L.-C., Han, R., Yu, B., & Wang, J.-W. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114602 · Cited by 281
Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal
Carton, W., Asiyanbi, A., Beck, S., Buck, H. J., & Lund, J. F. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.671 · Cited by 268
Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future
Fuhrman, J., McJeon, H., Patel, P., Doney, S. C., Shobe, W. M., & Clarens, A. F. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0876-z · Cited by 229
The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems
Creutzig, F., Breyer, C., Hilaire, J., Minx, J., Peters, G. P., & Socolow, R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee03682a · Cited by 217
Babin, A., Vaneeckhaute, C., & Iliuta, M. C. (2021) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.105968 · Cited by 192
The Climate Change Challenge: A Review of the Barriers and Solutions to Deliver a Paris Solution
Santos, F. D., Ferreira, P. L., & Pedersen, J. S. T. (2022) · Climate · doi:10.3390/cli10050075 · Cited by 209
Equity in allocating carbon dioxide removal quotas
Pozo, C., Galán‐Martín, Á., Reiner, D. M., Dowell, N. M., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2020) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0802-4 · Cited by 186
Self-citationOperationalizing the net-negative carbon economy
Bednar, J., Obersteiner, M. H., Baklanov, A., Thomson, M. J., Wagner, F., Geden, O., Allen, M. R., & Hall, J. W. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03723-9 · Cited by 182
Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development
IPCC (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157940.004 · Cited by 203
Potential implications of carbon dioxide removal for the sustainable development goals
Honegger, M., Michaelowa, A., & Roy, J. (2020) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1843388 · Cited by 147
Self-citationGreen and sustainable biomass supply chain for environmental, social and economic benefits
Hiloidhari, M., Sharno, M. A., Baruah, D., & Bezbaruah, A. N. (2023) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106893 · Cited by 139
Integrating Carbon Dioxide Removal Into European Emissions Trading
Rickels, W., Proelß, A., Geden, O., Burhenne, J., & Fridahl, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.690023 · Cited by 132
A policy roadmap for negative emissions using direct air capture
Meckling, J., & Biber, E. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22347-1 · Cited by 112
Lokesh, K., Ladu, L., & Summerton, L. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10061695 · Cited by 104
Mapping feasibilities of greenhouse gas removal: Key issues, gaps and opening up assessments
Forster, J., Vaughan, N. E., Gough, C., Lorenzoni, I., & Chilvers, J. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102073 · Cited by 111
Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk
Galán‐Martín, Á., Vázquez, D., Cobo, S., Dowell, N. M., Caballero, J. A., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26680-3 · Cited by 102
Contested framings of greenhouse gas removal and its feasibility: Social and political dimensions
Waller, L., Rayner, T., Chilvers, J., Gough, C., Lorenzoni, I., Jordan, A., & Vaughan, N. E. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.649 · Cited by 94
Torvanger, A. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1509044 · Cited by 91
Bellamy, R., Fridahl, M., Lezaun, J., Palmer, J., Rodriguez, E., Lefvert, A., Hansson, A., Grönkvist, S., & Haikola, S. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.022 · Cited by 91
Learning from the Climate Change Debate to Avoid Polarisation on Negative Emissions
Colvin, R. M., Kemp, L., Talberg, A., de Castella, C., Downie, C., Friel, S., Grant, W. J., Howden, M. S., Jotzo, F., Markham, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1630463 · Cited by 85
Beyond carbon pricing: policy levers for negative emissions technologies
Cox, E., & Edwards, N. R. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1634509 · Cited by 72
Michaelowa, A., Allen, M. R., & Sha, F. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1426977 · Cited by 75
Integrating carbon dioxide removal into EU climate policy: Prospects for a paradigm shift
Geden, O., Scott, V., & Palmer, J. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.521 · Cited by 76
Climate policy for a net-zero future: ten recommendations for Direct Air Capture
Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C. M., Low, S., Roberts, C., & Steinhauser, J. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac77a4 · Cited by 79
Higher Carbon Prices on Emissions Alone Will Not Deliver the Paris Agreement
Daggash, H. A., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.008 · Cited by 70
Govern CO2 removal from the ground up
Bellamy, R., & Geden, O. (2019) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-019-0475-7 · Cited by 66
Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries
Low, S., Fritz, L., Baum, C. M., & Sovacool, B. K. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47853-w · Cited by 65
Full, J., Merseburg, S., Miehe, R., & Sauer, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13074026 · Cited by 64
Negative Emissions: Priorities for Research and Policy Design
Fajardy, M., Patrizio, P., Daggash, H. A., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00006 · Cited by 66
Leveraging the bioeconomy for carbon drawdown
Dees, J., Sagues, W. J., Woods, E., Goldstein, H. M., Simon, A. J., & Sanchez, D. L. (2023) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc02483g · Cited by 68
Reviewing the sociotechnical dynamics of carbon removal
Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C. M., & Low, S. (2023) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.11.008 · Cited by 69
The BECCS Implementation Gap–A Swedish Case Study
Fuss, S., & Johnsson, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.553400 · Cited by 73
Is carbon dioxide removal ‘mitigation of climate change’?
Honegger, M., Burns, W., & Morrow, D. R. (2021) · Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law · doi:10.1111/reel.12401 · Cited by 59
Self-citationCarbon farming: a circular framework to augment CO 2 sinks and to combat climate change
Singh, S., Kiran, B. R., & Mohan, S. V. (2024) · Environmental Science Advances · doi:10.1039/d3va00296a · Cited by 71
Beyond Social Acceptability: Applying Lessons from CCS Social Science to Support Deployment of BECCS
Gough, C., & Mander, S. L. (2019) · Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports · doi:10.1007/s40518-019-00137-0 · Cited by 62
Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C. M., & Low, S. (2022) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102702 · Cited by 61
A Path From Sustainable Nutrition to Nutritional Sustainability of Complex Food Systems
Smetana, S. M., Bornkessel, S., & Heinz, V. (2019) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2019.00039 · Cited by 56
International carbon markets for carbon dioxide removal
Michaelowa, A., Honegger, M., Poralla, M., Winkler, M., Dalfiume, S., & Nayak, A. (2023) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000118 · Cited by 54
Self-citationMarkusson, N. O., Balta‐Ozkan, N., Chilvers, J., Healey, P., Reiner, D. M., & McLaren, D. P. (2020) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2020.00002 · Cited by 55
Self-citationMapping Multi-Level Policy Incentives for Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage in Sweden
Fridahl, M., Bellamy, R., Hansson, A., & Haikola, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2020.604787 · Cited by 59
Buylova, A., Fridahl, M., Nasiritousi, N., & Reischl, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.675499 · Cited by 53
Davarpanah, A. (2024) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c03025 · Cited by 53
Assessing Carbon Capture: Public Policy, Science, and Societal Need
Sekera, J. A., & Lichtenberger, A. (2020) · Biophysical Economics and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s41247-020-00080-5 · Cited by 61
Drivers and implications of alternative routes to fuels decarbonization in net-zero energy systems
Mignone, B. K., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Gurgel, A., Herzog, H. J., Johnson, J. X., Mallapragada, D. S., McJeon, H. C., Morris, J., O’Rourke, P., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47059-0 · Cited by 51
The UK net-zero target: Insights into procedural justice for greenhouse gas removal
O’Beirne, P., Battersby, F., Mallett, A., Aczel, M. R., Makuch, Z., Workman, M. H. W., & Heap, R. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.013 · Cited by 48
The challenge of carbon dioxide removal for EU policy-making
Scott, V., & Geden, O. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0124-1 · Cited by 47
Incentivizing BECCS—A Swedish Case Study
Zetterberg, L., Johnsson, F., & Möllersten, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.685227 · Cited by 57
The ABC of Governance Principles for Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy
Honegger, M., Baatz, C., Eberenz, S., Holland-Cunz, A., Michaelowa, A., Pokorny, B., Poralla, M., & Winkler, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.884163 · Cited by 45
Self-citationLife cycle optimization of BECCS supply chains in the European Union
Negri, V., Galán‐Martín, Á., Pozo, C., Fajardy, M., Reiner, D. M., Dowell, N. M., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117252 · Cited by 49
Self-citationExploring Narratives on Negative Emissions Technologies in the Post-Paris Era
Otto, D., Thoni, T., Wittstock, F., & Beck, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.684135 · Cited by 44
Ruseva, T. B., Hedrick, J., Marland, G., Tovar, H., Sabou, C., & Besombes, E. (2020) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.009 · Cited by 47
Burke, J., & Gambhir, A. (2022) · Energy and Climate Change · doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100074 · Cited by 51
The impact of technology availability on the transition to net-zero industry in Sweden
Sandberg, E., & Krook‐Riekkola, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132594 · Cited by 47
Low, S., Baum, C. M., & Sovacool, B. K. (2022) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102530 · Cited by 38
Equity implications of net zero visions
Lenzi, D., Jakob, M., Honegger, M., Droege, S., Heyward, J. C., & Kruger, T. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03270-2 · Cited by 37
Self-citationAntacids for the Sea? Artificial Ocean Alkalinization and Climate Change
Burns, W., & Corbett, C. R. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.016 · Cited by 36
Lee, K., Fyson, C. L., & Schleussner, C. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1970 · Cited by 42
Developing Africa’s energy mix
Schwerhoff, G., & Sy, M. (2018) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1459293 · Cited by 38
Hansson, A., Fridahl, M., Haikola, S., Yanda, P., Pauline, N., & Mabhuye, E. (2020) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-019-00517-y · Cited by 35
BECCS with combined heat and power: Assessing the energy penalty
Gustafsson, K., Sadegh-Vaziri, R., Grönkvist, S., Levihn, F., & Sundberg, C. (2021) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103248 · Cited by 35
Srikrishnan, V., Guan, Y., Tol, R. S. J., & Keller, K. M. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03279-7 · Cited by 41
Affordable CO2 negative emission through hydrogen from biomass, ocean liming, and CO2 storage
Caserini, S., Barreto, B. B., Lanfredi, C., Cappello, G., Morrey, D. R., & Grosso, M. (2019) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-018-9835-7 · Cited by 32
The International Politics of Carbon Dioxide Removal: Pathways to Cooperative Global Governance
Maher, B., & Symons, J. (2021) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00643 · Cited by 34
A Social Exploration of the West Australian Gorgon Gas, Carbon Capture and Storage Project
Marshall, J. P. (2022) · Clean Technologies · doi:10.3390/cleantechnol4010006 · Cited by 30
Low, S., & Honegger, M. (2020) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13565 · Cited by 30
Self-citationScott, K., Smith, C., Lowe, J. A., & Garcia‐Carreras, L. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102448 · Cited by 33
Oberlander, J. L., Burke, M. E., London, C. A., & MacIntyre, H. L. (2025) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-22-499-2025 · Cited by 28
Challenges and Opportunities of Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) for Communities
Buck, H. J. (2019) · Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports · doi:10.1007/s40518-019-00139-y · Cited by 32
Honegger, M., Derwent, H., Harrison, N., Michaelowa, A., & Schäfer, S. (2018) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-159656 · Cited by 27
Self-citationFull, J., Ziehn, S., Geller, M., Miehe, R., & Sauer, A. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12932 · Cited by 27
Vakilifard, N., Kantzas, E. P., Edwards, N. R., Holden, P. B., & Beerling, D. J. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1818 · Cited by 32
The Role of Corporates in Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal: Outlining a Research Agenda
Battersby, F., Heap, R., Gray, A. C., Workman, M. H. W., & Strivens, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.686762 · Cited by 27
CO 2 removal and 1.5 °C: what, when, where, and how?
Chiquier, S., Fajardy, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2022) · Energy Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ya00108j · Cited by 27
Abegg, M., Clulow, Z., Nava, L., & Reiner, D. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2024.1331901 · Cited by 30
Self-citationLarge-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: The Problem of Phasedown
Parson, E. A., & Buck, H. J. (2020) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00575 · Cited by 29
Honegger, M., Michaelowa, A., & Pan, J. (2021) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-021-09958-1 · Cited by 30
Self-citationProgressive supply-side policy under the Paris Agreement to enhance geological carbon storage
Zakkour, P., Heidug, W. K., Howard, A., Haszeldine, R. S., Allen, M. R., & Hone, D. (2020) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1803039 · Cited by 28
Assessing climate policies: Catastrophe avoidance and the right to sustainable development
Callies, D. E., & Moellendorf, D. (2021) · Politics Philosophy & Economics · doi:10.1177/1470594x211003334 · Cited by 22
Structural Evolution of the UK Electricity System in a below 2°C World
Daggash, H. A., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.009 · Cited by 22
Kreuter, J., & Lederer, M. (2021) · Global Sustainability · doi:10.1017/sus.2021.24 · Cited by 23
BECCS with combined heat and power: assessing the energy penalty
Gustafsson, K., Sadegh-Vaziri, R., Grönkvist, S., Levihn, F., & Sundberg, C. (2021) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103434 · Cited by 22
Clulow, Z., & Reiner, D. M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142013213 · Cited by 22
Self-citationZappa, W., Junginger, M., & van den Broek, M. A. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111987 · Cited by 22
Chiquier, S., Gurgel, A., Morris, J., Chen, Y.-H. H., & Paltsev, S. (2025) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ada4c0 · Cited by 25
Tachiiri, K., Herran, D. S., Su, X., & Kawamiya, M. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab5199 · Cited by 20
Business Models for Negative Emissions From Waste-to-Energy Plants
Torvanger, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2021.709891 · Cited by 20
Great power, great responsibility: Assessing power sector policy for the UK’s net zero target
Ball-Burack, A., Salas, P., & Mercure, J.-F. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113167 · Cited by 20
Energy policy and economics under climate change
Moriarty, P., & Honnery, D. (2018) · AIMS energy · doi:10.3934/energy.2018.2.272 · Cited by 21
Justice in managing global climate change
Wallimann-Helmer, I. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814104-5.00026-0 · Cited by 23
Harvey, V., Workman, M. H. W., & Heap, R. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103185 · Cited by 19
Boettcher, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2020.595685 · Cited by 19
Sovacool, B. K., Baum, C. M., & Low, S. (2022) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-022-10030-9 · Cited by 27
Pitelis, A. T., Vasilakos, N. V., Chalvatzis, K., & Pitelis, C. N. (2019) · Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society · doi:10.1093/cjres/rsz005 · Cited by 18
Afrane, S., Ampah, J. D., Adun, H. H., Chen, J. L., Zou, H., Mao, G., & Yang, P. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02190-8 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Honegger, M., & Reiner, D.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute for Sustainability at GFZ (DE)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Honegger, Matthias
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-12-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-321
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W2774436253
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14
- FWCI
- 25.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Climate Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database IASS (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01LS1621A)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Keywords
- negative emissions technologies, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture, sustainable development mechanism, international climate policy, financial incentives, carbon dioxide removal, land use conflicts, biomass resources, 1.5°C target, international financial flows, policy instrument design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
