Cited by 40Climate Change Policy and EconomicsEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth

The impact of implementing a consumption charge on carbon-intensive materials in Europe

Open access
Pollitt, Hector, Neuhoff, Karsten, Lin, Xinru·2020·Climate Policy

Abstract

The production of basic materials accounts for around 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Existing measures to reduce emissions from industry are limited due to a combination of competitiveness concerns and a lack of technological options available to producers. In this paper, we assess the possibility of implementing a materials charge to reduce demand for basic industrial products and, hence, also reduce industrial emission levels. The modelling shows that a charge equivalent to around €80/tCO2 could reduce the EU’s total (energy plus process) CO2 emissions by up to 10% by 2050, depending on the substitution options available. The materials charge could lead to small GDP increases and a minor reduction in overall employment levels.Key policy insights Full carbon price pass through along the materials value chain creates incentives for resource efficiency and substitution in the value chain of material use.Most macroeconomic models ignore mitigation opportunities in the value chain, as do carbon pricing mechanisms for industrial emitters, which largely mute incentives for mitigation opportunities with free allowance allocation.Including consumption at a benchmark level in emission trading systems reinstates a full carbon price incentive for all mitigation opportunities while avoiding competitive distortions and carbon leakage risks.Macroeconomic modelling shows that this allows for an additional 10% emission reduction accompanied by a slight GDP increase and employment reduction. Long-term clarity on carbon leakage protection furthermore strengthens low-carbon investment frameworks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14693062.2019.1605969

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies on the EU's CBAM proposal found that energy-intensive exporters, especially Russia and China, are likely to be adversely impacted.

    “Several studies pertaining to the EU's CBAM proposal (161-163) have found that energy-intensive exporters, especially Russia and China, are likely to be adversely impacted (159).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [163]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollitt, H., Neuhoff, K., & Lin, X.
Affiliations
  • Cambridge Econometrics (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Pollitt, Hector
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2019-06-18
Volume
20
Issue
sup1
Pages
S74-S89
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W2952275468
Cited by
40
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
FP7 Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities (603386)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Keywords
industrial emissions, CO2 emission reduction, carbon pricing, emissions trading, carbon leakage, resource efficiency, material substitution, macroeconomic effects, low-carbon investment, EU climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review