The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenges targeting cancer neoantigens in 2021: a systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Cancer neoantigens represent important targets of cancer immunotherapy. The goal of cancer neoantigen vaccines is to induce neoantigen-specific immune responses and antitumor immunity while minimizing the potential for autoimmune toxicity. Advances in sequencing technologies, neoantigen prediction algorithms, and other technologies have dramatically improved the ability to identify and prioritize cancer neoantigens. Unfortunately, results from preclinical studies and early phase clinical trials highlight important challenges to the successful clinical translation of neoantigen cancer vaccines.Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of current strategies for the identification and prioritization of cancer neoantigens with a particular emphasis on the two most common strategies used for neoantigen identification: (1) direct identification of peptide ligands eluted from peptide-MHC complexes, and (2) next-generation sequencing combined with neoantigen prediction algorithms. We highlight the limitations of current neoantigen prediction pipelines, and discuss broader challenges associated with cancer neoantigen vaccines including tumor purity/heterogeneity and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.Expert opinion: Despite current limitations, neoantigen prediction is likely to improve rapidly based on advances in sequencing, machine learning, and information sharing. The successful development of robust cancer neoantigen prediction strategies is likely to have a significant impact, with the potential to facilitate cancer neoantigen vaccine design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma
Ott, P. A., Hu, Z., Keskin, D. B., Shukla, S. A., Sun, J., Bozym, D. J., Zhang, W., Luoma, A., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Peter, L., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22991 · Cited by 2,936
Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer
Sahin, U., Derhovanessian, E., Miller, M., Kloke, B.-P., Simon, P., Löwer, M., Bukur, V., Tadmor, A. D., Luxemburger, U., Schrörs, B., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23003 · Cited by 2,488
Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation
Neefjes, J., Jongsma, M. L. M., Paul, P., & Bakke, O. (2011) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3084 · Cited by 2,044
Checkpoint blockade cancer immunotherapy targets tumour-specific mutant antigens
Gubin, M. M., Zhang, X., Schuster, H., Caron, E., Ward, J. P., Noguchi, T., Ivanova, Y., Hundal, J., Arthur, C. D., Krebber, W.-J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13988 · Cited by 1,974
Self-citationPredicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing
Yadav, M., Jhunjhunwala, S., Phung, Q. T., Lupardus, P., Tanguay, J., Bumbaca, S., Franci, C., Cheung, T. K., Fritsche, J., Weinschenk, T., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14001 · Cited by 1,186
MHC-II neoantigens shape tumour immunity and response to immunotherapy
Alspach, E., Lussier, D. M., Miceli, A. P., Kizhvatov, I., DuPage, M., Luoma, A. M., Meng, W., Lichti, C. F., Esaulova, E., Vomund, A. N., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1671-8 · Cited by 846
Wells, D. K., van Buuren, M. M., Dang, K. K., Hubbard-Lucey, V. M., Sheehan, K. C. F., Campbell, K. M., Lamb, A., Ward, J. P., Sidney, J., Blazquez, A. B., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.015 · Cited by 538
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 107
- 10.1073/pnas.85.7.2274 · DOI
- 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90078-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7652577 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa4971 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.165985.113 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aaa1348 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aad0095 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/onci.19727 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa3828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3800 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3932 · DOI
- 10.18632/oncotarget.6960 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00262-003-0480-x · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms13404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ni.1660 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006061 · DOI
- Creech AL, Ting YS, Goulding SP, et al. The role of mass spectrometry and proteogenomics in the advancement of HLA epitope prediction. Proteomics 18.12. 2018;18(12):1700259. · DOI
- 10.1586/14789450.2015.1070100 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41596-019-0133-y · DOI
- 10.1186/s13073-015-0245-0 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.51 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13073-019-0666-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv639 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp137 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3095 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01716 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13073-016-0264-5 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsos.170050 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx375 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx377 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01807 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1700893 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cels.2020.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.4313 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006457 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2680 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0433 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aad1253 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1251102 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg.2016.67 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gks299 · DOI
- 10.1186/1755-8794-4-68 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.2514 · DOI
- 10.3389/fgene.2013.00160 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12920-016-0213-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30516-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep31029 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13073-015-0195-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.06.008 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20831 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.20870 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0009272 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M114.042812 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1600808 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1501721 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.1800914 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005725 · DOI
- 10.1111/imm.12905 · DOI
- 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01367 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000877 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9 · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001658 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx248 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00874 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095910 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djt184 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eji.201141774 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20141308 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl216 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1018165108 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3185 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrc3245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature14426 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03268.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s00251-015-0873-y · DOI
- 10.1186/1745-7580-5-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0280-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0289-6 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.166.11.6720 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00251-019-01122-z · DOI
- 10.1002/eji.201545930 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13073-018-0594-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/imm.12763 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaf2288 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.073 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature12213 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0155189 · DOI
- 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0264 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1084/jem.184.2.441 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djw261 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.coi.2014.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature10755 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature18945 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.immunol.25.022106.141609 · DOI
- 10.3390/cancers6031670 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.it.2016.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Bassani-Sternberg M, 2019, Front Immunol, 10, 1832, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01832 · DOI
- 10.1080/21645515.2017.1364322 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a033704 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1406498 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature24473 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, I., Chen, M. Y., Goedegebuure, S. P., & Gillanders, W. E.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gillanders, William E.
- Venue
- Expert Review of Vaccines
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-06-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 827-837
- ISSN
- 1476-0584 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8395
- PMC
- PMC8410655
- OpenAlex
- W3165846104
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Expert Review of Vaccines (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Washington University School of Medicine Surgical Oncology Basic Science and Translational Research Training Program (T32CA009621)
- Washington University School of Medicine Cancer Center Support Grant (2P30CA091842-19)
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- neoantigens, neoantigen vaccines, cancer immunotherapy, peptide-MHC complex, tumor heterogeneity, tumor purity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, autoimmune toxicity
- MeSH terms
- Antigens, Neoplasm, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Cancer Vaccines, Tumor Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review