Cited by 52Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and Health

Increase in normal placental weights related to increase in maternal body mass index

Swanson, Leah D., Bewtra, Chhanda, Swanson, Leah D., Bewtra, Chhanda·2008·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reference values of normal placental weights are many decades old. Recently, a trend of increasing weights of normal placentas has been noted. We aimed to confirm this observation and to find any associated fetal and maternal factors. METHODS: Information on all live singleton deliveries that met our inclusion criteria was collected for the years 1995 and 2004 at Creighton University Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska. This information was compared to the standards set forth in the older references. The Student's t-test and correlation-regression statistics were applied. RESULTS: The mean weight of the mature, term (37-42 weeks of gestation) placenta has increased significantly from 1995 to 2004 (499 g to 537 g, p = 0.02), as well as from the older standards (27% increase at 40 weeks of gestation). There has also been a significant increase in the maternal body mass index (BMI) from 1995 to 2004 (25.2 to 26.5, p = 0.02), which correlates with maternal weight gain during pregnancy, and fetal and placental weights. CONCLUSIONS: Normal placental weights have increased over the last decades and this may correlate with increasing maternal obesity. Further studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14767050701866963

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are interactions between the current nutritional environment of the mother and her past nutritional history, as indicated by BMI and body composition, in determining placental phenotype.

    “There are also interactions between the current nutritional environment of the mother and her past nutritional history, as indicated by her body mass index (BMI) and body composition, in determining placental phenotype (29,521,527,556).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [521]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, L. D., Bewtra, C., Swanson, L. D., & Bewtra, C.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2008-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
111-113
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2015675287
Cited by
52
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
placental weight, maternal body mass index, maternal obesity, gestational weight gain, fetal weight, term singleton pregnancy, reference values
MeSH terms
Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Organ Size, Placenta, Pregnancy, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Fetal Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review